Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FUTURE WIDOWS OF AMERICA: WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN
Townhall Dot Com ^ | Thursday September 27 2001 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/27/2001 12:20:15 AM PDT by Brian Allen

After the World Trade Center was bombed by Islamic fundamentalists in 1993, the country quickly chalked it up to a zany one-time attack and five minutes later decided we were all safe again. We weren't. We aren't now. They will strike again. Perhaps they will wait another eight years. But perhaps not.

The enemy is in this country right now. And any terrorists who are not already here are free to immigrate. The government has been doing an excellent job rounding up suspects from the last two attacks. But what about the next attack? We thought there was only one murderous Islamic cell in America the last time, too.

Congress has authority to pass a law tomorrow requiring aliens from suspect countries to leave. As far as the Constitution is concerned, aliens, which is to say non-citizens, are here at this country's pleasure. They have no constitutional right to be here.

Congress has it within its power to prevent the next attack, but it won't. When the Sears Tower is attacked, the president is assassinated, St. Patrick's Cathedral is vaporized, anthrax is released in the subway systems or Disneyland is nuked, remember: Congress could have stopped it, but didn't.

Pious invocations of the Japanese internment are absurd. For one thing, those were U.S. citizens. Citizens can't be deported. So far -- thank God -- almost all the mass murderers of Americans have been aliens.

But even more blindingly obvious: There was no evidence that the attack on Pearl Harbor was staged by Japanese saboteurs living in California. The Japanese internment was a pure land grab implemented by liberal politicians -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt and California Gov. Earl Warren (later the namesake of the infamous Warren Court). The internment was vigorously opposed by J. Edgar Hoover.

This time, the very nature of the enemy is that they have infiltrated this country and pass themselves off as law-abiding, quiet immigrants. The entire modus operandi of this enemy is to smuggle mass murderers to our shores.

But the country refuses to respond rationally. Rather, Congress is busily contemplating a series of "anti-terrorism" measures most notable for their utter irrelevance to the threat. What precisely would a national ID card accomplish? The hijackers were in this country legally! A few may have overstayed their visas by a few days -- a minor bureaucratic oversight that they surely would have remedied had they not been about to commit suicide in a monstrous attack.

Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., has bravely proposed that we take the aggressive step of asking aliens in the country to register periodically with the government so we know where they are. That's already the law in Germany. Several of the hijackers in this attack lived in Hamburg; they obediently complied. The mastermind of the most vicious terrorist attack in the history of the world, Mohammed Atta, was in Florida on a "vocational status" visa (in order to attend flight school). Let's say Atta had registered. Now what, Joe?

As the entire country has been repeatedly lectured, most Muslims are amazingly peaceful, deeply religious, wouldn't hurt a fly. Indeed, endless invocations of the pacific nature of most Muslims is the only free speech it is safe to engage in these days.

This is a preposterous irrelevancy. Fine, we get it. The New York Times can rest assured that every last American has now heard the news that not all Muslims are terrorists. That's not the point. Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims -- at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours.

How are we to distinguish the peaceful Muslims from the fanatical, homicidal Muslims about to murder thousands of our fellow citizens? Are the good Muslims the ones who live quiet lives, pray a lot and obey the law? So did the architects of Bloody Tuesday's mass murder. Are the peaceful Muslims the ones who loudly proclaim their hatred of Osama Bin Laden? Mohammed Atta did that, too.

The only thing we know about them -- other than that they live among us -- is that they are foreign-born and they are Muslims. The government has been remarkably tight-lipped about precisely how many Muslim visitors we are currently accommodating, but from unofficial estimates, there appear to be more than a million. Even if the attorney general instigated latter-day Palmer raids, it will take years and years to investigate and infiltrate every potential terrorist cell operating on our shores. The investigations should not be conducted while the enemy continues residing here, plotting the next attack.

It's an extreme measure, but we face an extreme threat. It is suicidal naivete to think we can simply seal off every water supply, air vent, food supply and crop duster from now until the end of time. We cannot search every truck, every passenger, every shopper, every subway, every person entering every building -- every American every day.

It is impossible to stop Islamic fundamentalists who believe that slaughtering thousands of innocent Americans will send them straight to Allah. All we can do is politely ask aliens from suspect nations to leave -- with the full expectation of readmittance -- while we sort the peace-loving immigrants from the murderous fanatics.

More benefits of the plan next week, but the beauty part of the Terrorist Deportation Plan can't wait. There will be two fail-safes: (1) Muslim immigrants who agree to spy on the millions of Muslim citizens unaffected by the deportation order can stay; and (2) any Muslim immigrant who gets a U.S. senator to waive his deportation -- by name -- gets to stay.

This is brutally unfair to the Muslim immigrants who do not want to kill us. But it's not our fault. It is the fault of the terrorists who are using their fellow Muslims as human shields. So far, America's response to a calculating cold-blooded enemy has been to say, "Excuse me, you seem to have dropped your box-cutter."

©2001 Universal Press Syndicate


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: Silverdrake
I did. check the post numbers.
101 posted on 09/28/2001 10:11:49 PM PDT by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Quimby
Oops. Apologies. I need to take note of the number being replied to before I snarl. Mea culpa.
102 posted on 09/28/2001 10:14:04 PM PDT by Silverdrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Silverdrake
No offense taken.
103 posted on 09/28/2001 10:18:58 PM PDT by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
I'm a little torn about Ann's suggestion. How will I be able to get a microwave green-chile, potato burrito and a rootbeer-flavored Slurpee at 3AM if we go through with this?
104 posted on 09/28/2001 10:22:18 PM PDT by bootyist-monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bootyist-monk
I have it on good authority that as Ann's column is ever more widely promulgated and the news of the lowered intellectual and educational requirements for corner-store clerks spreads -- and even as we speak -- hoards of opportunistic-Canadian illegals -- even at risk of pissing off the Mexican illegals -- are pouring over our Northern borders to take up the slack!
105 posted on 09/28/2001 10:44:43 PM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Ann Coulter detractors
Well, let's see ... the current wave of terror is instituted by persons in America on visas, we have thousands here on visas of Muslim and/or Middle Eastern, Irani, Indonesian, and Algerian extract, we need to reduce the odds of more terrorist attacks by such people, we can revoke the visas and send these visitors back out of the country, thereby reducing the field from which we must cull ... yeah, I'd say Ann has it about right, and those sent out can return when the terrorists no longer have safe harbor in the countries from which the visas are cited, and we will be more meticulous in our allowances. Looks good to me; let's roll!
106 posted on 09/28/2001 10:55:01 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Revoke all the visas and send them home.
107 posted on 09/28/2001 11:02:23 PM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
Amen! We can sort it out later, when there is less threat.
108 posted on 09/28/2001 11:07:52 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
I'm sure they have also thought of all the private jets that are around the country. Are they being subjected to review and careful security controls? I doubt it. Hundreds of them exist and are potential flying bombs. There are two such planes that fly charters from our small, unprotected airport. Overpowering their owners and pilots would be very simple. Makes me shudder!
109 posted on 09/29/2001 7:17:18 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: Manny Festo
Bump, too!
111 posted on 09/29/2001 5:46:36 PM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Fred25
I remember public service announcements on TV back in the ‘60s that reminded legal aliens they had to report in (I think at a local post office where they lived) to account for themselves. I think that was required every 6 months.

Yes, my mother's mentioned this to me. Often. She went to the local post office once with a Egyptian friend here on a diplomatic passport.

112 posted on 09/30/2001 12:49:39 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Wow. Ann's gone off the deep end two weeks in a row. This has to be a parody, right? Right?
113 posted on 09/30/2001 1:23:22 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Those here on visa...those *WORKING* in the US. Those in tech industries. How do you propose to sell this to the corporations who are depending upon the people you propose to eject for an indeterminate length of time? It's like closing the barn door after the horse has run away. The time to filter them out is when they want to COME IN. Who's going to 'round them up'--boy what a political nightmare that would be and how big a victory for terror! In America of all places. I can just hear the refrain, "Next they'll come for the Jews."

She's gone off the deep end. A sad, sad day. She lost a lot of credibility with me.

114 posted on 09/30/2001 1:27:57 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Let's start a pool. How many more Americans in how many more attacks of what nature will needs exspire before Ann's words are heeded?

I'll go first. I say ... 30,000 ... in one attack ... with a suitcase nuke.

115 posted on 09/30/2001 1:32:05 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Forgot the picture.
116 posted on 09/30/2001 1:32:58 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bootyist-monk
OH! I hadn't thought of that. This IS a problem.
117 posted on 09/30/2001 1:35:36 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
She could have added one more thing: Revoke all laws limiting the right to carry--concealed or not--firearms. The government CANNOT AND WILL NOT protect us. The least they can do is let us protect ourselves.
118 posted on 09/30/2001 2:00:20 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dutchy, racebannon
ping
119 posted on 09/30/2001 3:09:20 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
You need to rethink this, Albert ...

Those here on visa...those *WORKING* in the US. Those in tech industries. How do you propose to sell this to the corporations who are depending upon the people you propose to eject for an indeterminate length of time? It is the damn greed of the airlines corporations and the democrat party that caused them to ignore all the warnings and blatant needs for increased safety measures which led to our being vulnerable to the 9/11 atrocities! The corporations don't or shouldn't come before the lives of the citizens. When you figure this out, perhaps you will see the deep wisdom of what Anne recommended.

120 posted on 09/30/2001 4:52:41 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson