Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Letter to the President (or, Why Bush Has Lost My Vote)
me | 9/26/2001 | Brent C. Skilton (aka Heisenburger)

Posted on 09/26/2001 2:02:39 PM PDT by Heisenburger

Dear Mr. President:

I want to tell you that you have lost my vote in the 2004 election. Though I voted for you in 2000, though I donated to your Victory 2000 campaign, and though I wore your pins and t-shirts, I cannot support you again.

Your diplomatic team, by trying to build a world coalition, has allowed Middle-Eastern and Arab dictatorships to dictate what we can and cannot do to respond to the attacks that took place on September 11. Instead of following the example of Ronald Reagan and basing foreign policy only on what is in the best interests of the United States, you have made concessions to Pakistan and Middle-Eastern countries that will threaten our security for years to come. The coalition has indeed determined the mission, not the other way around.

Specifically, your administration's statement that you will not overthrow the Taliban is unthinkably misguided. To not overthrow the Taliban is to give a feeling of security and power to other states that sponsor terrorism. Not only that, but it makes your statement last Thursday that the Taliban would share in the fate of terrorists an outright lie. One of the reasons I supported you in the 2000 election was that I was sick of being lied to by the Clinton administration. Now I see that you and your team are no different.

Furthermore, the fact that your administration, in an attempt to keep from offending Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, is not concentrating on Iraq as an important link to the Septemeber 11 attacks shows that you are not truly concerned with protecting Americans and ending terrorism. As Colin Powell said, Hussein is indeed the greatest terrorist in the world today. That he had a hand in the attacks on the 11th is not only highly probable, but also fairly obvious. The world can never be safe as long as Saddam Hussein is still in power.

In closing, I would remind you that you have a chance to win back my vote by changing your policy towards terror states and terrorists themselves. Perhaps your team should realize that "it is easier to ask forgiveness than to ask permission."

Sincerely,
Brent Skilton


TOPICS: Editorial; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last
To: BILL FROM TROUT CREEK PASS
THE HELL WITH OPEC!!!! IT'S HIGH TIME TO START DRILLING OUR OWN OIL AND BE 100% TOTALLY RELIANT ON OURSELVES FOR OUR GAS AND OIL RESOURCES. WE SHOULD TELL THE MIDDLE EAST GOOD RIDDANCE AND KEEP THEIR OWN OIL!!!! TELL THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS TO KISS OFF SO WE CAN GO TO ALASKA OR OFF THE CALIFORNIA COASTS TO GET OUR OWN OIL.
61 posted on 09/26/2001 2:48:21 PM PDT by jragan2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"Let's hope we have a Country to have an election in 2004."

Are you saying you have no hope for Gore?

62 posted on 09/26/2001 2:48:21 PM PDT by marajade (maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
History has clearly shown that investigations and economic sanctions do not stop terrorism. Only force can solve the problem.

Taking away their actual assets isn't "economic sanctions", it's starving the beast directly. And, as I pointed out, it's only one aspect of the total operation. The goal cannot be to simply wipe the terrorists out -- new ones would simply pop up to take over. The goal of the operation is to destroy the infrastructure of the terrorist networks so that the next wave of killers won't be able to train and prepare.

That means drying up their funding. That means breaking up their cells located here. That means pressuring states into withdrawing their support and protection of the thugs. And yes, it also means killing some people and blowing stuff up, both via secretive special-ops work and blunt, direct military action. Each piece is important to contributing to the overall success of the operation.

As for being impatient, I am going on the line coming directly from the mouth of the administration. They have said they will not try to topple the Taliban. There is no disagreement that this is the official line from the White House as this week.

You are taking the media's spin on this a little too dearly. The statement was that the US is not interested in establishing a new government for Afghanistan. If (actually, when) the Taliban gets in our way, they will suffer. We are not going to occupy Afghanistan, though. We will not prop up a puppet government. That "nation-building" crap is not a goal of the overall operation.

When we're done in Afghanistan, the (severely weakened) Taliban will likely fall to one of the two opposition groups -- but that's not our concern here, especially if whoever does take over remembers the object lesson about to be presented.

63 posted on 09/26/2001 2:49:07 PM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Lost amidst Uncertainty, eh. Bye. Nice not to have known you.
64 posted on 09/26/2001 2:50:02 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
burger....The ultimate goal in this war is Saddam, once and for all. If you think Bush is fool enought to let Powell convince anyone otherwise, you did indeed waste your vote.

Powell is only a messenger boy, nothing else and there has been a great effort by some here on FR to sow dissension among the people that there is a problem where there is none.

65 posted on 09/26/2001 2:50:35 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
We haven't begun to answer yet! I'll wager that before we are half finished, their will be dozens of States lined up against the horror of the American response...

Mike

66 posted on 09/26/2001 2:50:37 PM PDT by MichaelP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Still running around posting your crap, huh?

That's okay. President Bush earned way more votes than he lost this past two weeks.

67 posted on 09/26/2001 2:50:41 PM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
"I'm hoping McCain will run as an independent in 2004."

Haven't you seen the poll where they have him running as independent against Gore and Bush? McCain takes away more Democratic registered votes than he does Republican but still loses.

Quite frankly I'm glad McCain isn't President, I think he's much too unpredictable.

68 posted on 09/26/2001 2:50:55 PM PDT by marajade (maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Don't break your leg jumping off the bandwagon.

Somehow I very much doubt that you ever voted for him much less supported him.
69 posted on 09/26/2001 2:52:04 PM PDT by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Specifically, your administration's statement that you will not overthrow the Taliban is unthinkably misguided

If Bush keeps saying things like these, he will be overthrown.

70 posted on 09/26/2001 2:52:18 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: j_k_l
Somehow I very much doubt that you ever voted for him much less supported him.

Do you want me to show you the check stubs from my campaign contributions? Do you want me to show you the Bush 2000 bumper sticker on my car?

72 posted on 09/26/2001 2:54:02 PM PDT by Heisenburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RickyJ
If Bush keeps saying things like these, he will be overthrown.

Overthrown? Overthrown?

Are you a looney?

73 posted on 09/26/2001 2:54:28 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: skip2myloo
BUMP! Surprise is a valuable tactic. Lets wait till our backs are reasonably clear b4 kicking serious camel-jockey @$$.
74 posted on 09/26/2001 2:56:17 PM PDT by clee1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Pardon me but this is a really stupid post. Oh I get it, Clinton and or Gore would be much better.

Give me a break.

75 posted on 09/26/2001 2:56:22 PM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Here's what Bush actually said:

President George Bush said he was not interested in "nation building" - long-term troop deployments to help rebuild a shattered country.

The best way to fight the "flat evil" of terrorism would be to "ask for the co-operation of citizens within Afghanistan who may be tired of having the Taliban in place or tired of having Osama bin Laden" in their country.

By your repudiation of Bush and his policies in this war, I assume that:

you are FOR 'nation building';

you are FOR long term deployments to rebuild Afghanistan;

and that you are AGAINST:

asking for the cooperation of the citizens within Afghanistan who don't want the Taliban.

Is this correct, or are you just shooting your mouth off?

Silly me, I was actually waiting for a response to this...

76 posted on 09/26/2001 2:57:13 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Those About To Jump Off The Bandwagon
Take some advice from Nancy Reagan and "Just Say No To Drugs".

You need help.

A third rate journalist writes an article for a fourth rate newspaper and you fifth rate intellects get your panties in a wad.

Maybe it's time to turn off mom's imac and learn how to engage in critical thinking.
77 posted on 09/26/2001 2:58:46 PM PDT by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
Give me a break. We didn't do anything for what, four months after Pearl Harbor?

We don't have a clue what's coming. Be patient.

78 posted on 09/26/2001 2:58:51 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heisenburger
With all your profound military know-how < /sarcasm >, won't you share your military experience with us? I'm sure the Pentagon could use your input right now. Why not send them a letter as well? They would no doubt be amazed that Heisenburger has all the answers and strategy they are seeking. Just think........you wouldn't have to waste your time and typing fingers on Free Republic to get attention.
79 posted on 09/26/2001 3:01:08 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Great response. I agree with you completely.
80 posted on 09/26/2001 3:02:33 PM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson