Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starbucks dropped the ball in New York (Charged Rescue Workers For Water To Save Lives)
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER ^ | Tuesday, September 25, 2001 | ROBERT L. JAMIESON Jr.

Posted on 09/25/2001 8:02:00 AM PDT by toupsie

Starbucks dropped the ball in New York

Tuesday, September 25, 2001

PhotoBy ROBERT L. JAMIESON Jr.
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER COLUMNIST

For Starbucks coffee mogul Howard Schultz, the terrorist attacks in New York City hit home.

Schultz was born in Brooklyn. He lived in or near the Big Apple for more than two decades. He has opened more than 130 Starbucks stores in Manhattan and the surrounding boroughs, each one serving up java -- along with the company's hallmark customer service.

So how then to explain what happened to the Midwood Ambulance Service, a company based near Schultz's old Brooklyn stomping grounds?

On Sept. 11, after the horrific collapse of the World Trade Center, workers for the ambulance company rushed to get bottled water for patients.

They went to a Starbucks store near "Ground Zero" and got, well, let's allow the ambulance company to spill the beans:

"A great deal of people were in shock from the devastation," a representative of the family-owned ambulance company wrote in an e-mail to Starbucks. "Shock victims are supposed to drink a lot of water. When employees of Midwood Ambulance went to the Starbucks down the street to get bottles of water for the victims they were treating, can you believe Starbucks actually charged them for it!!!"

Wait, there's more...

"These men, heroes for what they were doing, paid the $130 for three cases of bottled water out of their own pockets. Now, I would think that in a crisis such as this, vendors in the area would be more than happy to lend a little help by donating water. Well, not Starbucks! As if this country hasn't given you people enough money already!"

The e-mail continued:

"I love Frappuccinos as much as anyone, but any company that would try to make a profit off of a crisis like this doesn't deserve the American public's hard-earned money."

Now, let's give Starbucks the benefit of the doubt.

Let's pretend for a moment that employees at the store in Battery Park were not motivated by callousness when they charged medical personnel for water in a time of need.

Still, the store's unwillingness to donate water -- when many other people in New York and elsewhere freely gave supplies and labor -- came at the very same time when its corporate parent was all too willing to do something else: pat itself publicly on the back.

In a press release, the Seattle-based coffee company publicized how it had temporarily closed its North American locations "so that our partners could return to be home with their families and friends."

Gee, what Starbucks did for its "partners" -- that's Starbucks-ese for employees -- was nice, but certainly not something worthy of tooting its own horn about.

Given the context of national suffering, such publicity came across as self-serving and something else: tasteless.

If the mistreatment of the ambulance company resulted from one ill-guided employee at one Starbucks store, then the coffee giant, which fancies itself a good business neighbor, failed to do the right thing when the issue first reached the corporate level.

Starbucks could have made nice when a representative from the ambulance company called up to complain about the H{-2}0 imbroglio. But that didn't happen.

The ambulance company employee told Starbucks, "When I called...to inquire about this at your 'contact us' phone number from your Web site, I was told in a rather rude way that this could not have happened and abruptly thanked for my call and dismissed."

Starbucks had the chance to turn this unfortunate incident into something positive and, it appears, shrugged it off.

So the ambulance company eventually went to a higher level, writing a Dear Orin letter -- as in Starbucks President and CEO Orin Smith. That correspondence, dated Sept. 17, began: "Dear Orin, I have been a good customer of Starbucks for a number of years..."

It went on to explain what had happened and expressed how the ambulance company felt: "I am completely and utterly disappointed in you and your company and would sooner have open heart surgery without anesthesia before I would give you another red cent of my hard-earned money."

Neither Schultz, who is Starbucks chairman and chief global strategist, nor Smith could be reached. Audrey Lincoff, a company spokeswoman, confirmed that Starbucks had talked to Midwood Ambulance Service and had received its correspondences.

Finally, last week, Smith spoke to the head of the ambulance company and expressed "his deep concern" over the incident, the coffee company said.

Starbucks is now looking into how the faux pas occurred.

But the coffee company has made amends, swallowing its pride and doing something to make up for the case of customer disservice: It reimbursed the ambulance company in Brooklyn.


P-I columnist Robert L. Jamieson Jr. can be reached at 206-448-8125 or robertjamieson@seattlepi.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
Think that is my last coffee from Starbucks and I had a 3 dollar a day habit. Can you imagine the GREED required to charge a Rescue Worker for a bottle water to save another human's life? Very, very sick. One thing this tragedy has done has made it easy to seperate the bad from good...
1 posted on 09/25/2001 8:02:00 AM PDT by toupsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: toupsie
I never liked going in Starbucks...always felt underdressed for some reason. I think I'll just stick with my Maxwell House.
2 posted on 09/25/2001 8:08:55 AM PDT by 2Jedismom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Well, what do you expect from the people who have ruined coffee in the United States, buying cheap quality beans, roasting them very dark to disguise the low quality, and emphasizing espresso drinks that can tolerate the cheap quality coffee.

The whole rise of espresso and similar very dark roasts in Italy and France was a result of the simple fact that the average citizen couldn't afford decent quality coffee beans. Low quality beans are lousy when medium roasted to the point where high quality beans have the greatest flavor and aroma.

3 posted on 09/25/2001 8:12:32 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (who drinks Jamaica Blue Mountain, Hawaii Kona or Celebes Kolossi and a pox on Starbucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Interesting.

I've had some *horrible* experiences at NY Starbucks. Love their coffee, but the service and management here is just atrocious.

Schultz should be ashamed.

4 posted on 09/25/2001 8:12:42 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
I had the same thing happen to me in Venice, Ca. when I came to the aid of a car crash victim. It did not involve Starbucks but rather another coffee shop. These places have a policy of not providing free water in order to discourage bums from free-loading. I imagine what happened is that the Starbucks bureacracy was not nimble enough to adapt to the situation and the employees didn't want to risk their jobs.
5 posted on 09/25/2001 8:13:29 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
"One thing this tragedy has done has made it easy to seperate the bad from good..."

Amen to that.

6 posted on 09/25/2001 8:14:39 AM PDT by Hail Caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
I always felt overcharged for my bean water......I learned how to make great coffee while in the US Navy, don't need these guy's.....

NeverGore

7 posted on 09/25/2001 8:15:06 AM PDT by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Two things the local "partners" may not have had the authority to give away the water and didn't want to take a chance of having their "partnership" arrangement terminated. The "partners" are very young and probably have no authority at all. Second what to bet that the "partners" weren't compensated for the time that management of Starbucks gave them off to be with their families. A time when my guess that no one was buying coffee. Seems to me that Starbucks save a bunch of $$$ by that action. I’m sure the idea of cost savings never crossed their minds. Anyone know if the Starbucks near the disaster area have hiked their prices?
8 posted on 09/25/2001 8:15:22 AM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
Disgusting display of Human Character.

I will not patronize them again.

9 posted on 09/25/2001 8:17:17 AM PDT by KeepTheEdge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
#2 Try the Italian Espresso roast; as good as Starbucks; maybe writing to Maxwell House will provide bottled water for these heroes. I'll post e-mail in a minute.

P.S. Make your own Biscotti, too. ;-)

10 posted on 09/25/2001 8:17:28 AM PDT by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Thanks for posting this. After election 2000 a member of the DNCCongressional Campaign Committee was quoted as saying, "We lost every precinct that didn't have a Starbucks!" I find that statement prescient.

During X42's reign a friend of mine and I would go to Starbucks so that we could loudly talk about the scandals. We knew we were on enemy territory and reveled in it.

Did you also know that they are a significant donor to Planned Parenthood?

Regards,

TS

11 posted on 09/25/2001 8:18:45 AM PDT by The Shrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
We have Starbucks here in the UK now. I am very grateful I bought my own bloody cappucino machine and know how to make my own coffee. This is beyond disgusting.

Regards, Ivan

FreeBritannia.co.uk
12 posted on 09/25/2001 8:20:09 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
I can live just fine without Starbucks.
13 posted on 09/25/2001 8:20:18 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale
This is just so unbelievable. There was a man giving away shoes on the street. The guys who are helping include many volunteers. People are giving money to fund for the kids of the firefghters and police killed. And Starbucks charges for water...well freepers, we know what to do here. Bury these bastards at corporate in email. And don't buy their coffee.
14 posted on 09/25/2001 8:20:44 AM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Who needs that overpriced yuppie crap anyway.

Plain, black Maxwell House, thank you!

15 posted on 09/25/2001 8:20:58 AM PDT by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale
Common sense should have popped into someone's head. Hey, there are Rescue Workers screaming for water, people's lives were in danger and the dust from 2 1/4 mile high buildings is filling the streets, do you think we should charge them for water?

I live in NYC (bout a 1/2 mile from what was the WTC) and see Starbucks on every block (literally they stores across from stores), I will be walking by each and everyone of them from now on. Might be posting this article on their windows as well. This is absolutely disgusting.

16 posted on 09/25/2001 8:21:42 AM PDT by toupsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
Now I know why I was never interested in Starbucks...

Had I been an employee (partner) I would have given the water and belled the cat with a visit to the media had I been terminated.

Greed will always come back to haunt, even though it may be disguised as hardship.

17 posted on 09/25/2001 8:22:25 AM PDT by Monkey Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
anybody know email addys for these bloodsuckers? I haven't done my morning email protest and woke up in a bad mood.
18 posted on 09/25/2001 8:22:27 AM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: katze
Thanks for the tip! I'll try it.

Got a good biscotti recipe?

Phoo-ey on Starbucks. I always thought they were pretentious anyway. " An ounce of pretention is worth a pound of manure"

19 posted on 09/25/2001 8:22:41 AM PDT by 2Jedismom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: airedale
Well that's capitalism. Forced charity is taxation. It's also bad business to not to react charitably to a crises situation such as the WTC. Good judgement is a rare commodity. Most people follow the rules no matter what.
20 posted on 09/25/2001 8:22:43 AM PDT by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson