Skip to comments.
Galilee Drought Uncovers Oldest Village In The World
Sunday Times (UK) ^
| 9-23-2001
| Dina Shiloh
Posted on 09/24/2001 1:40:07 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: Jolly Rodgers
What kind of creature would you suppose built the village, if not human? My ex wife.
To: blam
Thousands of items including huts, tools and fireplaces found at Ohalo, on the southwestern shore, give a unique insight into the semi-nomadic people who lived there towards the end of the early Stone Age.Most interesting was the stone tablet saying: OHALO: POPULATION: 600. STROM THURMOND, MAYOR
42
posted on
09/24/2001 3:24:07 PM PDT
by
Jhensy
To: blam
Presumably or a lot of subsidence(sp?). I think it's probably a similar situation to what inundated the old villages under the Black Sea. Which is to say, heavy runoff from the mountains (maybe even the breaking of an ice dam) could have fed the Jordan river, and raised the Sea of Galilee to cover this spot.
43
posted on
09/24/2001 3:30:50 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Focault's Pendulum
My ex wife. You married an older woman?
To: Jolly Rodgers
You married an older woman? I could never get into her purse to check her I.D.
It must have been all those facelifts and plastic enhancement procedures. I suspected as much when her boobs started melting under the sunlamp.
To: Focault's Pendulum
I suspected as much when her boobs started melting under the sunlamp. That would explain why she built her hut under the water in a place as hot as Galilee.
To: blam
For the record, archeologists found evidence in this world's oldest village of the world's oldest whorehouse proving again the world's oldest profession.
To: Jolly Rodgers
I would have much preferred a pillar of salt. Doesn't talk much and a readily available supply seasoning on hand.
Comment #49 Removed by Moderator
To: blam
"The settlement, dating back 20,000 years, came to light in one of the worst droughts in recent years."Finally, after 20,000 years, precipitation rates are normalizing. Ought to calm down the cries of the eco-terrorists!
BTW are the eco-terrorists on GWs list?
To: RightWhale
"What is the age of the oldest village ever found? Is that the one in South America?" Don't know the answer to that but, I can see already that we're headed to a controversy about what constitutes a 'village.' There are many archaeology 'sites' older than 20k years old. What is a 'village?'
51
posted on
09/24/2001 4:19:30 PM PDT
by
blam
To: sarcasm
"Are you gonna drain your lakes?" No. We know when they were built, 1952. Besides, they were almost dry until this year from the drought that we had down here for 3.5 years. (I did find some unusual things in the areas where I looked though.)
52
posted on
09/24/2001 4:23:52 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Presumably or a lot of subsidence(sp?).
I'm thinking the latter since a lot of this entire region at one time was quite lush.
53
posted on
09/24/2001 4:26:51 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Sender
witty
54
posted on
09/24/2001 4:32:08 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: rface
Probably a bunch of signs there saying "death to the USA"
To: nopardons
What's wrong with carbon dating ?
It assumes that production and decay of C14 are in equilibrium. They are not. The result is that the older an object actually is, its C-14 date will make it appear to be much older. Of course, that's assuming the rate of production has remained constant. The discrepancy between the rates of production and decay were at first just assumed to have been experimental error because it was previously assumed that they would have to have already been in equilibrium. As I recall, the difference was something between 10 and 20%, though it's been a while since I read the paper.
56
posted on
09/24/2001 4:33:15 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Straight Vermonter
GRATUITOUS: Be prepared for the wave of creationist [sic] who will soon be here to tell you the huts are only 15 years old.
57
posted on
09/24/2001 4:34:57 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Ah, but my prediction came true!
To: Da_Shrimp
Actually, it refers to the Earth's decaying magnetic field, and the fact that this points to an Earth roughly 10,000 years old.
Copy and paste this URL into your Address bar; I don't know how to post links:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3317.asp
Scientists are just people, and they tend to discard as irrelevant any "test" results or "control anomalies" which do not comport with their pre-formed conclusions. In fact, if one has a hand in assembling the data, a "scientific" projection can take any curve you like.
To: Straight Vermonter
Drier?Shudda been. The ice age was still going strong in Europe and North America, locking up a great deal of fresh water in glaciers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson