Replies

Lame argument, zero? It is brilliant in its simplicity and common sense. I see how you took the opportunity to prove me wrong instead of attacking me. LOL. I'll come up with "something original" when you come up with an answer to this one. Do you think sand castles are created by 'natural selection'? ;-)

I see how you took the opportunity to prove me wrong instead of attacking me. LOL.

In what way did I "attack" you? All I said was that your argument was lame and unoriginal. I didn't say anything about you at all.

"Of course not. Nothing that is created in a day can be created by natural selection. You're comparing something purpose built with a process that takes billions of years with many failed approaches. It's a totally invalid analogy." Ummm, who said the sand castle was created in a day? Take all the time you want with that sand castle by 'natural selection' or perhaps you can tell me about how many log cabins have been formed by windstorms in forests? Again, take all the millions of years you need. ;-) Face it, nature goes from order to disorder. Always has. Always will. If evolution were true we would see every kind of intermediate species, i.e. "missing links". Yeah, they are missing alright. LOL They never existed. Never have. Never will. Even Darwin himself admitted that if the these missing links were not found in the next hundred years of fossil digging, that his theory was wrong. He was right. He was wrong. LOL So tell me...just where are all the intermediatry links between ANY 2 species, much less humans and apes. Evolution is a rip-roaring laugh just on the surface.

Of course not. Nothing that is created in a day can be created by natural selection. You're comparing something purpose built with a process that takes billions of years with many failed approaches. It's a totally invalid analogy.

In other words, we're never gonna actually see this happen, it takes too long, so get over it and just have FAITH......

Nothing that is created in a day can be created by natural selection. You're comparing something purpose built with a process that takes billions of years with many failed approaches. It's a totally invalid analogy.

The lie and the excuse in one paragraph. You are ascribing to so called natural forces the ability to intelligently design something. This is totally false. The first question that evolutionists need to answer (which they do not even ask) is who wrote these natural laws? Who enforces them?

The next thing evolutionists need to answer is how a single new gene is created. This they cannot do. For a new functional gene all you have is mere chance to work with, not natural selection. In addition you need a purpose which of course matter can have no purpose. You must have a goal, and of course mindless matter cannot have a goal. The problems are overwhelming and evolution "science" has no answer for it.