Cite: Is this another of your B.S. claims that you'll not prove?
Cite: Is this another of your B.S. claims that you'll not prove?
Of course you ignore the proof already given about his well known close cooperation with the atheists Huxley and Haeckel (for proof of that just read the introduction to the Descent of Man). Unlike the evolutionists, I give proof for my statements. I do not go around through dozens of threads avoiding giving proof. Here is is:
"P.S. Would you advise me to tell Murray [his publisher] that my book is not more un-orthodox than the subject makes inevitable. That I do not discuss the origin of man. That I do not bring in any discussion about Genesis, &c, &c., and only give facts, and such conclusions from them as seem to me fair.
Or had I better say nothing to Murray, and assume that he cannot object to this much unorthodoxy, which in fact is not more than any Geological Treatise which runs sharp counter to Genesis."
From: Daniel J. Boorstein, The Discoverers, page 475.
If you even wish for additional proof, look at the following article from an evolutionist in a current post right here on FreeRepublic:Saving Us From Darwin
I will also be expecting an apology from you for calling me a slimer for telling the truth about your atheist hero.