Sinkspur's comments on this post were not germane to the discussion. Once he made them, however, he was criticized, and you and a few others demanded proof of his assertion. I simply provided the proof. If you don't like the answer, there is no reason to attack the messenger.
For what its worth, I don't think that demidog's take on libertarianism was representative of libertarians as a whole. He had what was IMO some extreme positions, but I never had a problem with him. If he's no longer a freeper, that is unfortunate. But he said what he said. Your denying it doesn't change reality.
Or, like Demidog, you advocate that America ought to be made safe for child pornographers. Firstly, sinkspur made a fase accusation. It was a boldfaced lie. You attempted to give it credibility by jumping in on an attack on a person who is not here to defend themselves.
You are beneath contempt.