[Osinski]

Or, like Demidog, you advocate that America ought to be made safe for child pornographers. Firstly, sinkspur made a fase accusation. It was a boldfaced lie. You attempted to give it credibility by jumping in on an attack on a person who is not here to defend themselves.

You are beneath contempt.

[malakhi]

Firstly, sinkspur made a fase accusation. It was a boldfaced lie.

Sinkspur made an accusation which is corroborated by demidog's own words. Do you deny he said what I quoted him as saying? Click on the links. He speaks for himself. As I said, demidog's views are not representative of libertarianism as a whole. He did not personally favor child porn, of course, but he did specifically oppose laws prohibiting possession of it. You can deny it all you want, but the facts are the facts.

You attempted to give it credibility by jumping in on an attack on a person who is not here to defend themselves.

His words are on the record. What, I'm not supposed to QUOTE HIM DIRECTLY just because he is not here?

I will assume that you personally never criticize anyone who is not present to defend themselves. No one. Not a politician, not another freeper. No one.

You are beneath contempt.

Yawn.

Good thing I could care less what you think, or my feelings might be hurt. I quote someone's words, with links to the original, and you respond by personally attacking me? Go read Storm Orphan's #290 for a lesson in how to disagree without being disagreeable.