Posted on 09/23/2001 11:51:52 PM PDT by ppaul
Crowded into Westlake Plaza yesterday afternoon were hundreds of people: professional protesters, anti-military activists and plenty of regular folks with kids, jobs and mortgages, who wanted to let the world, the city, anyone who would listen, know that they don't want war. They carried placards and signs that said, "One people, one planet" and "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind."
And they cheered for speakers who called for reason, patience, compassion and forgiveness in the midst of a military buildup sparked by the terrorist attacks.
"Tuesday (Sept. 11) gave us a pile of rubble that was not only of bricks but also of bodies and hopes and dreams," said Gina Aaf, an Afghanistan native and University of Washington student. "There have been many piles just like that throughout history and one more pile isn't going to solve anything."
Ed Mast, a spokesman for the 911 Peace Coalition that helped organize the Alternatives to Violence rally, urged the crowd to be strong of heart.
"We are grieving. We are mourning," he said. "But let's not betray our grieving with more violence. Let's not betray our mourning with more deaths."
Many in the crowd acknowledged that there was an element of futility to their message: Their voices couldn't stop the buildup of arms and forces already under way in the United States and abroad.
But they said it was important for people to know that the war movement, while supported by many, is by no means supported by all.
"It's a very important thing to show that there are people who are opposed," said Ernest Mailhot, a member of the Socialist Workers Party.
"There's been this idea that if you are not backing the war drive, you're not mourning the dead, and that's wrong."
Cori Adler, a professor, writer and mother who brought her 2-year-old daughter, said she hoped the tragedy would inspire the United States to re-examine its role in the world.
"We can't put all our energy into being a superpower and then be surprised when we're viewed as bullies," she said.
Whenever one group attacks another, it's often described as a strategic move.
"Well, now that's happened to us and we know that all that symbolic posturing is really about real bodies, real blood and real lives."
The demonstration, which may have drawn as many as 800 participants, was overwhelmingly peaceful despite a small group of counterprotesters who gathered across the street with signs and flags.
"We're out here to support the U.S. and George Bush," said Crosby Olsen, a student at O'Dea High School. "All these people, if they got what they wanted, this country would no longer be free and they wouldn't be able to stand over there and protest."
Lee Tuimanu'a, a former Marine who served two tours in Vietnam, was driving through town on his Harley when he saw the demonstration and the small group of counterprotesters. He pulled over and took a stand with the smaller group.
An anti-war demonstrator, who didn't want to give his name, approached Tuimanu'a, wanting to know why the ex-Marine picked that side.
"I've earned my citizenship. I have a right to be here. You haven't earned anything," said Tuimanu'a, who was wearing a "Remember New York" T-shirt and a red, white and blue bandana.
After a few more exchanges, he lost patience: "Kid, you're a leech. You have the luxury of being here for free because guys like me made the sacrifice."
(emphasis added)
'from your 'friends' in berkeley' indeed!
Stupid.
If anything, "one people, one planet means the whole world's blind."
Like you said THIS time we are not going to let them get away with it. YESSSSSSSssssssss
2. Our "support" of Batista was simply our recognition of the current legitimate government of Cuba - had Castro not expropriated large amounts of property owned by U.S. citizens and gotten in bed with the Soviet Union, we'd have probably recognized him as well.
3. The "Clinton doctrine"? You're joking, right? How long have you lurked here? Does the name Riady ring a bell? Huang? Mena, Arkansas?
I doubt if that opinion will get you banned, but it might get you flamed a bit. Underlying it is the assumption that if the guys we supported were bad guys, the other guys were good guys, and that is demonstrably untrue. In the case of Khomeini, the bad guy - the Pahlavi Shah - we supported was displaced by a worse guy who would have hated us anyway no matter what we did before him. Sorry, but foreign policy just works that way - we bombed Milosevic and got the KLA; if we'd bombed the KLA we'd have Milosevic, and your complaint would be made either way. If we hadn't bombed anybody we'd be culpable for letting "ethnic cleansing" continue and your complaint would still be made.
Where we've backed stinkers, it was generally because the other guy was worse, or at least we thought so at the time. Hindsight is 20/20; it's a pity you can't conduct foreign policy on that basis.
Looks like they were outnumbered 8 to 1 by the silent bodies continuing their silent protest beneath the rubble of the WTC.
There is something obscene about that image.
Yes you are, the same thing we are all missing.
Some sign of intelligent life...
Well then let them surrender on the battlefield.
There is a certain symmetry to that...
A child throwing a tantrum is dissenting.
You missed a subtle essential: Dissent is profoundly more meaningful when exercised by those who have earned the right through sacrifice, sweat and blood.
SEMPER FI!
Reminds me of the homecoming that awaited my husband in October 1968.
He lead a Strike Team against communists attempting to down our F-111s and take over all the villages surrounding the airfield to better position themselves to do so, committing atrocities as 'lessons' as to what resistance would bring.
They also took all their food supplies and animals and destroyed their crops.
After a full year, he was literally picked up from the jungle to be taken home.
The strewardesses tried to tell them about the sentiments back home - to travel in civvies, for example, so as to not 'upset' the objectors at home.
Debarking at Travis with a planeload of other warriors, they were 'greeted' by a contingent of college students in hippie clothes reviling them.
One little twit spit in his face, and he acted reflexively - snapped her arm and broke it.
Without saying a word - and with the police watching with a twinkle in their eyes! - he and the others each grabbed a punk and dragged him/her into the rest room.
They were dealt a Lesson in "Thou Shalt Not Spit In Public 101," walking out to smiles from the persons who saw it begin.
It became worse. Flying across the country in uniform to get standby status, he was told on two flights to 'Please sit in the very rear of the plane so you will not disturb the civilians' - and he was forced to do so.
The disgrace of the civilian behavior haunts many of us still...perhaps there will be understanding this time around from those for whom they fought TO have their freedom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.