Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cost of Life (Clinton/Gore Sellout of Security for Campaign Contributions) **FR EXCLUSIVE** #3
Thread Two ^ | 9/23/01 | Jon Loose and Connie Hair

Posted on 09/23/2001 7:00:47 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar

One last time in Breaking News, then the news outlets are on their own! LOL


At the invitation of UPI, Jon Loose and I wrote this op-ed and submitted it a week ago. UPI told us that every single person who read it there said that this was not commentary but that it was news. They have told us they were assigning staff to cover this story.

Since Newsmax has broken the story, I thought it time to put out information that has not yet come to light.


The Cost of Life
By Jon Loose and Connie Hair

Hindsight is always 20/20. You see causes and proactive avenues that could have altered the outcome. Sometimes these ignored actions are discounted as unreasonable. Other times, you point your finger at a deserved party.

In the wake of the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, the most compelling raison d'être is that we failed to take our own advice. More specifically, the weaknesses in airport security were largely identified a number of years ago.

In July of 1996, in the wake of the crash of TWA flight 800, President Clinton convened the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security by executive order 13015 to take place on August 22, 1996. He gave the commission 45 days to “study matters involving aviation safety and security, including air traffic control and to develop a strategy to improve aviation safety and security, both domestically and internationally,” then present their conclusions. He named Vice President Al Gore to head the commission. By special invitation of the President, Victoria Cummock was named to the commission. Ms. Cummock lost her husband in the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scottland some eight years prior. According to Newsday, Cummock held the reputation at the time of “the airlines’ most tenacious foe.”

Five years prior to September 11, 2001, Gore held a press conference to announce the commission’s preliminary report that promised, “to take the strongest measures possible to reduce the risk of terrorism and sabotage to airline passengers and crews.” Gore further stated that their upcoming proposed measures will, “be put into place quickly and effectively and will help ensure that airline travel remains as safe as possible for all travelers.” A solid and factual preliminary report backed up Gore’s comments.

Ten days later, just prior to the 1996 election, Gore penned a letter to airline lobbyist Carol Hallett, promising that the commission's findings would not cause the airlines any loss of revenue. The very next day the Democratic National Committee received a check in the amount of $40,000 from TWA. Over the next two weeks Northwest, United and American Airlines donated $55,000 more.

In the next two months the Democratic National Committee pocketed over $250,000 from American Airlines. United Airlines threw in an additional $100,000. Northwest Airlines added $53,000. That’s a grand total of over half a million dollars. According to the Washington Times, Whitehouse Spokesman, Ginny Terzano gave no denial when asked whether Al Gore solicited these airline donations personally.

Contributory advice and suggestions were being sought and incorporated into the draft(s) of the report by all sides of the aisle and divisions of government including intelligence agencies, transportation agencies and military personnel. The draft final form was presented to the 21 participating commissioners in January of 1997. According to the Washington Times, a significant number of security measures were removed from the proposed final draft of the report.

Victoria Cummock and CIA Director John Deutch were resolute in their opposition to the “softball” report. Gore was given no choice but to pull back the report. Reinstalled were sensible new procedures that would cost the airlines millions of dollars.

· Conduct airport vulnerability assessments and develop action plans
· Require criminal background checks and FBI fingerprint checks for all screeners, and all airport and airline employees with access to secure areas
· Deploy existing technology
· Signifi cantly expand the use of bomb-sniffing dogs
· Complement technology with automated passenger profiling
· Certify screening companies and improve screener performance
· Aggressively test existing security systems
· Use the Customs Service to enhance security
· Give properly cleared airline and airport security personnel access to the classified information they need to know
· Begin implementation of full bag-passenger match
· Providing more compassionate and effective assistance to families of victims
· Improve passenger manifests
· Significantly increase the number of FBI agents assigned to counter-terrorism investigations, to improve intelligence, and to crisis response
· Provide anti-terrorism assistance in the form of airport security training to countries where there are airports served by airlines flying to the US

The security measures were in the final recommendation report. However, the implementation timetable was nowhere to be found.

In February of 1997, Victoria Cummock called the report “toothless.” She informed Gore that unless specific implementation dates were added in the report she would file a dissent, because the airline industry would not have to do anything until such measures were mandated.

On February 12, 1997, an open meeting was held on the commission’s final report. Gore made a point to inform Ms. Cummock that he would leave room for her dissent to the final report. NBC Dateline caught these comments on videotape. Also on videotape was Mr. Gore presenting the final report to President Clinton minutes later and pronouncing that the report had unanimous consent. But it didn’t.

Victoria Cummock filed suit claiming that Gore pressured her to abandon her call for counter-terrorist measures, the right to see commission files of which she was denied, and the right to file her 42-page dissent. It was her ambition to see the commission’s findings presented accurately within the final report. Gore painted Cummock, who had lost her husband in a terrorist act, as a disgruntled commissioner.

In mid 1999 Ms. Cummock won her case in the D.C. Court of Appeals. In the long drawn out and impeded discovery process a memo was discovered from a CIA staffer, specializing in psychological profiling. According to The American Spectator, the memo stated that Cummock could be "kept in line if she believes progress could be made" but "could become a major problem."

On September 11, 2001, those ultimately responsible for the destruction of thousands of precious lives were the terrorists who pulled the knives and steered the planes.

But playing politics and intentionally ignoring obvious safety and security voids in an industry that has been a target of terrorists for over thirty years is unconscionable.

Now the airlines are paying the price. We all are.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: espionagelist; govwatch; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Clinton's a liar
This may be too overwhelming to take in one shot.....

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

Clintons

41 posted on 09/23/2001 8:15:09 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
I think there is already a song with "rectify" in it... at least a small, small piece of it has been running through my head since your post! LOL

Thank you for the bumps!

42 posted on 09/23/2001 8:16:42 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one, rwfromkansas
LOL! Thank you, hole_n_one! I knew we could count on you!

The warning should be for rwfromkansas, as I don't have the stomach to click on the links! LOL

Thank you so very, very much, again!

43 posted on 09/23/2001 8:18:09 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Thanks for not posting all those Clinton photos on this thread. Thus, all the people who want to lose their appetite must perform an affirmative act.

I've been watching my tape of today's prayer service (missed the first hour or so) and Clinton's boo-boo on his nose was incredibly prominent. Think Hillary's bought more jagged lamps? Maybe she threw some of the debris she stole from Ground Zero.

44 posted on 09/23/2001 8:19:33 PM PDT by HateBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Magnificent.
45 posted on 09/23/2001 8:21:45 PM PDT by jo6pac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
The warning should be for rwfromkansas, as I don't have the stomach to click on the links!

Believe me, if prohibition were still in place, neither would I.

46 posted on 09/23/2001 8:22:06 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HateBill
"Thus, all the people who want to lose their appetite must perform an affirmative act."

LOL! Very well put!

47 posted on 09/23/2001 8:22:21 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
LOL! Okay, I gotta go open bottle of wine!
48 posted on 09/23/2001 8:23:02 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
You aware of which ones of these were during the national anthem (they all look like different times)?
49 posted on 09/23/2001 8:23:47 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jo6pac
Thank you, jo6pac!
50 posted on 09/23/2001 8:23:48 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
lol.....well, it wasn't that bad....I must have a really strong stomach or something, it did not phase me....lol. I have seen some pics of her that were just the most grotesque thing you could ever see though and that did just shock me....
51 posted on 09/23/2001 8:25:01 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Sorry, rw, I've been Clintonless for a few months now, and it's been heaven on Earth. The viceral response I have when I see them these days is not something I seek to experience! But, you knock yourself out! LOL
52 posted on 09/23/2001 8:28:53 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
We love you CAL!
53 posted on 09/23/2001 8:29:06 PM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
To be honest, I don't believe any of them are taken at that precise moment....she was shown for a mere 2-3 seconds while the National Anthem was being played.

I don't think a still photo would capture the moment adequately......unless everybody had their mouths open, while her's was closed and tight lipped...

We'll keep trying though!

54 posted on 09/23/2001 8:29:35 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Excellent work, Connie....BRAVO on this article......I'm emailing it everywhere!
55 posted on 09/23/2001 8:32:33 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Reporting for FR Nighttime Bumping Duty, ma'am!
56 posted on 09/23/2001 8:35:45 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Bump and thanks for this post, Connie.....and how about a smooch for me, too........nah, better not. TailspinMary would beat me over the head.

FReegards, Jim

57 posted on 09/23/2001 8:36:04 PM PDT by TailspinJim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GEC
Why, thank you, GEC! Hugs.
58 posted on 09/23/2001 8:41:07 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Thank you, Julie. We simply must not give up exposing these criminals for exactly what they are!

Thanks, again!

59 posted on 09/23/2001 8:42:01 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
well put Connie and a bump for you
60 posted on 09/23/2001 8:42:25 PM PDT by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson