Behe have to strike terror in the hearts of Darwinists
Behe invokes laughter in the hearts of informed Darwinists. Many of his rock solid predictions of things that would never be published in "Science" or "Nature" have come to pass, including several things about flagula rotors that were already published before his book was. Apparently, he didn't do too thorough a job of benchchecking. To calculate the odds of something occuring, you have to know the state-space, and the selection criteria within it. You know no such thing about what happened to produce, for instance, cellular life. If you have no detailed idea about how a thing happened, you have no analytical ability to estimate the odds against it. These "whirlwind can't build a 707 from sand" arguments are all of this highly doubtful nature, including Behe's.
Not at all, that is why none of them have been able to refute his statements.
Your statements about his theories are also an evolutionist lie. We do indeed know exactly what the chances of a single gene arising are. It is based on scientific experiments comparing the differences in genes with the same functions from different species and also on tests showing what amino acid codes are absolutely necessary to attain the intended function. He explains this quite clearly in one of his articles and in his book - and there has been absolutely no refutation by the Darwinists of it.
I guess this means that there are uninformed Darwinists, lurking about somewhere, too..........