[Elsie]

"It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution,
that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)."
– Leading Darwinist Richard Dawkins

---

Ok "C" folks: which category do YOU fall into?

I'm picking ignorant.
(because I can then be 'educated')

...not picking stupid.
(because then I can't be 'educated')

...not picking insane.
(because that would be nuts!)

...not picking wicked.
(because then I would be exposing the condition of my heart.)

[Elsie]

Are there also categories for "Evolutionists"?

---

Other that the two main ones:

"It happened so fast there is no record"

"It happened so slow, we haven't found all the record."

[gore3000]

I pick (e)- Dawkings is an evolutionist slimer just like so many other evolutionists on these threads. Since so many of the evos here seem to have read him and cannot do anything but insult, one must conclude that there is no science in his books else they would use his proofs on these boards.