Replies

Well which is it, a terrorist’s bombing or a US Navy test gone wrong?

I have not read of any lawsuits over this crash. Why in lawsuit happy America?

I have not read of any bulletin by Boeing to “Fix” the fuel tank problem. Why in lawsuit happy America would a major corporation leave itself open to further damages from a ‘major problem’ with the 747?

I have not read of any FAA directive to the airlines to ‘Fix’ the fuel tanks on 747s.

Why at this time did both Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mr. Kallstrom bring up TWA 800? What’s the connection to the terrorist’s WTC action and TWA 800? For those that do not believe in coincidence, the timing of the both these statements is very interesting. And not from ‘one source’ but two major Clinton administration players. Remember that TWA 800 was not a bombing, or missile strike according to the Clinton regimen, so now what’s the connection to a hijacking by terrorists?

Could this be both a terrorist’s action and a US Navy test gone wrong? Could some how the terrorists discovered the ‘Secret' US Navy test and flown TWA 800 into the test area to draw the missile away from the target and towards TWA 800? Or just a bad time for a missile test, which leads us back to coincidence!

More questions then answers, but it seems there is something rotten in Denmark. We need to pressure the sources to explain. This maybe the crack in the Clinton dam. Time to apply pressure! For five years the press may have been covering up this story to cover Clinton. What a story, the ‘free press’ kill a story about either the terrorist’s first blood of US civilians, or a major Clinton mistake that killed US civilians.

Either way, I want to know!

October 10, 1998 by Ian Williams Goddard. From the article: After first claiming that no Navy assets were in the area accept a P-3 Orion aircraft, the Navy then admi- tted that they had three submarines in the area.[10] After first claiming that there were no military man- euvers in the area that night [11], months later the Navy admitted that there were. [10] In addition, TWA 800 researcher Tom Shoemaker proved that there was a large-scale wargame in the area during July 17, 1996 [12], and private investigator James Sanders learned through his inside contacts that the Navy was testing advanced anti-missile technologies that evening. [13]

Now, after claims that the closest Navy ship was 185 miles away, comes the admission that Navy ships were in fact within 3 to 6 miles of the TWA 800 crash, in the very area from which witnesses saw a missile rise.

This maybe the crack in the Clinton dam. Time to apply pressure! For five years the press may have been covering up this story to cover Clinton. What a story, the ‘free press’ kill a story about either the terrorist’s first blood of US civilians, or a major Clinton mistake that killed US civilians.

I am seeing more evidence all the time that the shield that protected bill clinton is falling down, the Emperor is being seen by the liberals to have no clothes. I believe this is the beginning of the unraveling of all the lies, deceit, chicanery, corruption, treason, and every other vile act of bill clinton's presidential legacy. It will take time, but, like Old Man River, it just keeps rolling along. The left has far less to protect now, especially, especially since gore lost. Stack onto that fact this terrorist attack and its world wide impact, and there is even less reason to protect the president who could have ordered our troops and intelligence agencies to go after bin Laden in a meaningful way ... throw in the anger of the American public, their outrage at this happening, and I think it's a pretty potent brew for the truth to start coming out.