Posted on 09/17/2001 3:12:24 PM PDT by tallhappy
I saw this on Sunday and did not want to post on it until I had the actual transcript.
Kerry eseentially blames us for provoking the attack.
SNOW: Senator Kerry, earlier on the broadcast -- I want to go back to something you mentioned earlier. Earlier on the broadcast, Attorney General Ashcroft was talking about a series of changes he thinks we need to do to improve our domestic vigilance.
You referred to a bit of that when you were discussing money laundering. We have a series of laws to deal with drug dealers in terms of seizing their property, seizing their assets, the kinds of intelligence we can do on them, what we can do with their money and so on.
Do we need to apply that immediately to terrorists? And furthermore, do we need to be able to expand the FBI's ability to do domestic counter- intelligence?
KERRY: There is no question that we will have to change some of the laws in order to deal with terrorism. A lot of us have been trying to do that for some period of time in various sectors, and we've met with resistance because it was deemed to interfere with the normal course of business or, in some people's mind, to weigh too heavily on one side of the balance of how we view our freedoms of the country. But this, I think, has changed that. I'm confident Congress will respond.
But let me say one other thing we need to do, and some people will not probably appreciate this, but I think it's an honest statement of what the United States needs to do.
Globalization and technology have changed the perception of the United States in the world. And there are many of us who feel that we have not been doing enough or sensitive enough to the way in which we are perceived by many countries. We need to not only be tough here, we need to not only respond and ferret out Osama bin Laden, but we need to also listen. We need to also be thoughtful in some of the policies so that we can build friendships and build relationships around the globe and not be alienating quite as many people as we have, I think.
And also, we have to be be particularly sensitive to the rest of Islam and the Islamic world. This cannot be done in a way that lumps everybody into the same pool. There are distinctions here. Osama bin Laden is a perversion of Islam. In fact, the Taliban, many of the leaders of the Taliban are not even trained deeply in religiously. They don't have a deep background in religious training. They have taken Islam and they are changing Islam.
And what Islam itself needs is almost a reaffirmation, if you will. It needs to stand up and speak to the world about its peacefulness and its ability to be part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And we need to be certain that we don't make matters worse in the ways in which we choose to do this. I think that is absolutely essential. And there's much we can do in our foreign policy, in my judgment, to be much more proactive, much more thoughtful and much more sensitive to the needs of the rest of this planet.
You know, somehow I knew one of your particular gender would be only too happy to point that out.
I was only giving you a hard time but since you don't seem to see that let me say that, no, you didn't admit anything. All you did was further slam women. I win? I didn't realize this was a contest but I'll accept it anyhow.
[BTW, I am watching the Pakistani leader as I type. It is hard to follow, he is rambling somewhat. I heard Clinton's name mentioned. Which led me to as "what if?" fantasy. What if bubba's so called friends around the world started talking?]
P.S. needling always turns into a contest.
and letting...ummm never mind. LOL
P.P.S. simply put, in deference to your gender, i did not Further slam "women".... I specifically singled out that group that causes non republicans to get elected.
My mistake. I forgot you were a statist. One dare not buck the status quo and all of that.
But...I will resort to repeating my mantra, and will try to be more imaginative next time...
Two concessions in one day...Geez.
Good God, how many times do we have to go over this? Voting in line with your principles may not always get you the outcome you want (neither does voting against them, hence, you still got Clinton and didn't vote for him) but it makes living with yourself much more palatable.
But...I will resort to repeating my mantra
Good, because it is true.
Two concessions in one day...
Well, it takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. That means twice today you were very mature. Good for you. LOL
Well, I can only apologize for being a little dull yesterday, but it has been quite a while since i got to play
with The sharpest knife in the drawer.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.