Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry Blames Says US Not Sensitive Enough - Implies we provoked the attack.
Fox News | 9-16-01

Posted on 09/17/2001 3:12:24 PM PDT by tallhappy

I saw this on Sunday and did not want to post on it until I had the actual transcript.

Kerry eseentially blames us for provoking the attack.

SNOW: Senator Kerry, earlier on the broadcast -- I want to go back to something you mentioned earlier. Earlier on the broadcast, Attorney General Ashcroft was talking about a series of changes he thinks we need to do to improve our domestic vigilance.

You referred to a bit of that when you were discussing money laundering. We have a series of laws to deal with drug dealers in terms of seizing their property, seizing their assets, the kinds of intelligence we can do on them, what we can do with their money and so on.

Do we need to apply that immediately to terrorists? And furthermore, do we need to be able to expand the FBI's ability to do domestic counter- intelligence?

KERRY: There is no question that we will have to change some of the laws in order to deal with terrorism. A lot of us have been trying to do that for some period of time in various sectors, and we've met with resistance because it was deemed to interfere with the normal course of business or, in some people's mind, to weigh too heavily on one side of the balance of how we view our freedoms of the country. But this, I think, has changed that. I'm confident Congress will respond.

But let me say one other thing we need to do, and some people will not probably appreciate this, but I think it's an honest statement of what the United States needs to do.

Globalization and technology have changed the perception of the United States in the world. And there are many of us who feel that we have not been doing enough or sensitive enough to the way in which we are perceived by many countries. We need to not only be tough here, we need to not only respond and ferret out Osama bin Laden, but we need to also listen. We need to also be thoughtful in some of the policies so that we can build friendships and build relationships around the globe and not be alienating quite as many people as we have, I think.

And also, we have to be be particularly sensitive to the rest of Islam and the Islamic world. This cannot be done in a way that lumps everybody into the same pool. There are distinctions here. Osama bin Laden is a perversion of Islam. In fact, the Taliban, many of the leaders of the Taliban are not even trained deeply in religiously. They don't have a deep background in religious training. They have taken Islam and they are changing Islam.

And what Islam itself needs is almost a reaffirmation, if you will. It needs to stand up and speak to the world about its peacefulness and its ability to be part of the solution, not part of the problem.

And we need to be certain that we don't make matters worse in the ways in which we choose to do this. I think that is absolutely essential. And there's much we can do in our foreign policy, in my judgment, to be much more proactive, much more thoughtful and much more sensitive to the needs of the rest of this planet.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: dubyaismypresident
complete outrage!
41 posted on 09/19/2001 7:45:45 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident,xsmommy
He's one of the biggest walking scumbags in that party.

War record is admirable, but you can see it in his eyes.

42 posted on 09/19/2001 7:48:22 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Why in the world do liberals think "if we just listened" or if we were "concerned" about our image in the world, people wouldn't try to blow us up?

And they call Republicans the stupid party!

43 posted on 09/19/2001 7:51:57 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
He's one of the biggest walking scumbags in that party.

Now THAT is saying something

44 posted on 09/19/2001 8:08:11 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
"Why in the world do liberals think "if we just listened" or if we were "concerned" about our image in the world, people wouldn't try to blow us up?."

Most liberals tend to think that, deep down, everyone is really a good Episcopalian at heart.

45 posted on 09/19/2001 8:10:13 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Unfortuneatly. you are soooo correct.
46 posted on 09/19/2001 8:13:00 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
Why in the world do liberals think "if we just listened" or if we were "concerned" about our image in the world,

Because that particular language works wonders on the idiot WOMEN that elect them.

47 posted on 09/19/2001 8:13:56 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Sorry to say it ladies,
But Clinton never won the male vote
On second thought, why should I be sorry.
48 posted on 09/19/2001 8:18:52 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
No suffrage = No Dem president. EVER.

As much as I respect the women HERE,a large percentage of the rest are incapable of making decisions based on things other than emotion.
They should apologize.

49 posted on 09/19/2001 8:22:57 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
You are preaching to the chior

Too bad we couldn't get a competancy test of some sort, so only the Freeper Ladies could vote,

50 posted on 09/19/2001 8:24:38 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
that has been suggested before...
51 posted on 09/19/2001 8:28:44 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Because that particular language works wonders on the idiot WOMEN that elect them.

Unfortuneatly. you are soooo correct.

Hmmmmmmmmm, something deliciously ironic in that, don't you think?

52 posted on 09/19/2001 8:31:48 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I saw this and noticed that he was blaming America. Sheesh.
53 posted on 09/19/2001 8:31:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
You know, somehow I knew one of your particular gender would be only too happy to point that out.
54 posted on 09/19/2001 8:43:36 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
P.S. I give much more attention to electoral matters that proofreading....
55 posted on 09/19/2001 8:44:23 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
obviously....HAHA...geez way too much coffee today!
56 posted on 09/19/2001 8:46:34 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I see. So that was a just a little 'social experiment' on your part, then. Very clever. LOL
57 posted on 09/19/2001 8:49:03 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
No, I am man enought to ADMIT when I get busted. I saw it go as I hit post, and was sitting here waiting for the castigation. Somehow, I had a pretty good idea where it would come from. you win.
58 posted on 09/19/2001 8:51:49 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dead
oh man.....how could you do that to Herman Munster... Herman was NEVER in the closet with his looks....He was an ambassador of fun. Kerry is dangerous pure and simple.
59 posted on 09/19/2001 8:52:34 AM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
How's this for sensative?

Dear Osama Bin Laden, Yasser Arafat, and Sadam Hussein, et. al.,

We are pleased to announce that we unequivocally accept your challenge to an old-fashioned game of whup-ass. Now that we understand that there are no rules, we look forward to playing by them for the first time.

Since this game is a winner-take-all, we unfortunately are unable to invite you to join us at the victory celebration. But rest assured that we will toast you -- LITERALLY.

While we will admit that you are off to an impressive lead, it is, however, now our turn at the plate.

By the way, we will be playing on your court now.

Batter up.

Sincerely,

The 270,000,000 citizens of the United States of America

60 posted on 09/19/2001 8:56:08 AM PDT by otterpond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson