Replies

Pretend I'm a woman who doesn't see abortion as murder (I'm not, but I'm playing devil's advocate). I say that this violence is perpetrated by men and will stop when women take over since women don't start wars. What is your rebuttal?

I say that this violence is perpetrated by men and will stop when women take over since women don't start wars. What is your rebuttal?

When you get back to planet Earth let us know.

What is your rebuttal?

Golda Maer?

Shalom.

I say that this violence is perpetrated by men and will stop when women take over since women don't start wars. What is your rebuttal?

History. The Trung sisters of Viet Nam. Maria Theresa of Austria. Elizabeth I of England. Catherine the Great of Russia. Queen Nzinga of Angola. Wars aren't "fought" by rulers---they're fought by the ruled. And women in power have sent men to death in wars just as men in power have. Utopian femi-nazi theory won't change that.

My rebuttal is simple and direct.
Feminist would have you believe that MEN are the cause of all Evil, PERIOD.
They would also have you believe that their political, social, intellectual and physical worlds are far superior to the existing paradigms.
There is one thing that they can not refute or vanquish however,
This is the facts that MEN are physically stronger and more powerful than Women and that Women can not survive without MEN to protect them from other MEN. Their incredibly narrow minded views and closed secular worlds are only possible because MEN allow it to exsist. If it were not for these MEN their little feminist world would be quickly destroyed by MEN from other areas that do not allow women these luxuries. Those who were not destroyed would become the slaves and concubines of those MEN who would have them.
Feminist are the extreme example of the frailties of womanhood and are the exaggerated demonstration of all the weaknesses of unrestrained hatred and paranoia.

In the end it matters not what they think or want, for MEN will have it the way they want it regardless of their ratings and actions. Those foolish women who would physically put themselves in the inhibiting path of this inevitability will pay the ultimate price for their ignorance and their arrogance.

My rebuttal is simple and direct.
Feminist would have you believe that MEN are the cause of all Evil, PERIOD.
They would also have you believe that their political, social, intellectual and physical worlds are far superior to the existing paradigms.
There is one thing that they can not refute or vanquish however,
This is the facts that MEN are physically stronger and more powerful than Women and that Women can not survive without MEN to protect them from other MEN. Their incredibly narrow minded views and closed secular worlds are only possible because MEN allow it to exsist. If it were not for these MEN their little feminist world would be quickly destroyed by MEN from other areas that do not allow women these luxuries. Those who were not destroyed would become the slaves and concubines of those MEN who would have them.
Feminist are the extreme example of the frailties of womanhood and are the exaggerated demonstration of all the weaknesses of unrestrained hatred and paranoia.

In the end it matters not what they think or want, for MEN will have it the way they want it regardless of their ratings and actions. Those foolish women who would physically put themselves in the inhibiting path of this inevitability will pay the ultimate price for their ignorance and their arrogance.

she who rocks the cradle, rocks the world.....

Well, there was Elizabeth I of England and Catherine the Great of Russia. Things were not exactly quiet during their reigns. Then there was that de Medici woman that wasn't the quietest woman in Italy.

My bebuttal would be that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men have historically had all of the power, and therefore responsibility for acts of violence. Women, and especially women with power are just as capable of exerting violence on other weaker members of society.

The very fact that . . . you don't consider in-utero living humans (male and female) to be worthy of legal protection, proves that you would use a technicality to re-define humans as non-humans like Hitler did the jews. Further more, you would ignore the moral and civil-injustice of the act on the basis that it is legal ... just the same as the oppressive male-dominated societies justify their abuse of women as "legal".

You are what you hate!

Margaret Thatcher