1 posted on
09/17/2001 9:48:09 AM PDT by
Starmaker
To: Starmaker
We entrust our lives to the pilot when we fly. It only makes good sense to allow the pilot and co-pilot the opportunity to defend themselves and in turn the lives of all on board. Whoever thinks contrary to that is an idiot.
2 posted on
09/17/2001 9:53:38 AM PDT by
Slyfox
To: Starmaker
Respect the Constitution and arm the passengers! It is real telling that our government distrusts its citizens as much (or more) than they distrust the terrorists.
To: Starmaker
1st step - are pilots, 2nd pilots are not allowed to leave the cockpit for ANY reason, 3rd - make the cockpit totally secure and airtight! 4th - install sleeping gas lines into the passenger compartment, 5th - allow ex military, police officers to carry on a concealed weapon.
To: Starmaker
Uh, and what do you/we think will happen when a couple of bullets go through the plane i.e. a pressurized cabin?
8 posted on
09/17/2001 10:29:07 AM PDT by
gdani
To: Starmaker
I can only hope that this policy is adopted. In the mean time the FAA won't allow rest of us honest citizens so much as a pocketknife on the plane.
Apparently we are all going to have to learn how to kill armed hijackers with our bare hands.
To: Starmaker
Amen! ... and the 2nd step is to allow all responsible citizens with government approved CCWs to carry onboard.
Even a catastrophic decompression is preferable to what happened on Tuesday. But that is another liberal lie. 10,000 deaths.
Terrorists love a PC nanny-nation of victims (which is what we are becoming today).
To: Starmaker
Amen! ... and the 2nd step is to allow all responsible citizens with government approved CCWs to carry onboard.
Even a catastrophic decompression is preferable to what happened on Tuesday. But that is another liberal lie. 10,000 deaths.
Terrorists love a PC nanny-nation of victims (which is what we are becoming today).
To: Starmaker
Step 2 . re-arm all American citizens per 2nd amendment
To: Starmaker
Many of the pilots do not want to be armed. They do not want a terrorist knowing there is a gun available in the cockpit.
I am not sure putting bullit holes in the fusalage is such a good idea at 30,000 feet.
Personally, it would make more sense to me to give every passanger a fully charged tazer when they boarded. Yes, you would be giving on to the terrorist, but tazers only work once per charge. The terrorist would then be facing a cabin full of armed people.
Probably would reduce the amount of air rage also.
15 posted on
09/17/2001 10:40:17 AM PDT by
eFudd
To: Starmaker
I was wondering if seat belts were kept on then the pilot could do a roll-over and cause the bad guys to crack their heads on the ceiling........
just a thought.
To: Starmaker
20 posted on
09/17/2001 11:04:07 AM PDT by
Schnucki
To: Starmaker
We will also need to pass a law that prevents the pilot and crew from being sued if a passinger or passingers get injured or killed while they are trying to defend the plane. I am not a pilot but I would not fly a passenger airplane, armed, without that protection.
22 posted on
09/17/2001 11:16:08 AM PDT by
Flint
To: Starmaker
How will we know that the future terrorist won't be the pilot?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson