Posted on 09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT by AJFavish
http://www.meib.org/articles/0106_ir1.htm The link above is to: Iraqi Complicity in the World Trade Center Bombing and Beyond by Laurie Mylroie, which was published in June of this year and discusses the 1993 bombing of the WTC. She explains how Bill Clinton intentionally failed to confront Iraq over its complicity in the bombing and other attacks. She supported Clinton in 1992 having been an advisor on Iraq policy to the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign, as you can see at http://admissions.geneseo.edu/cgi-bin/nrap?Roemer98.html Her September 13, 2001 article in the Wall Street Journal on the recent attack is at http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=95001120 In a live interview on Los Angeles radio station KPFK, broadcast around noon today, PST, she stated that Clinton lied about more than sex; he lied about national security. I wish somebody would ask her about whether she thinks the Clinton administration covered up Iraqi involvment in the murder of those aboard TWA 800 and ordered the military not to pursue the attackers. Or whether there was Iraqi involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing that was not pursued. Regards, Allan J. Favish
http://members.aol.com/allanf8702/page1.htm
It might have been Brian Kilmead.
Which ones?
What would that have to do with anything? The maintenance requirements performed on aircraft precludes any of the items you mention. That is the point of it.
p.s. DO try to avoid personal attacks; this thread was not started as a personal attack against or about you.
Thank you.
Eh? You are saying the cargo door "ripped off", "fodding" the engine, the forward fuselage separated (as a result of the engine FOD or separating from the fuselage?) and that cause the center tank to explode?
You're not involved in aviation, are you? If you are, what is your past?
I think the comments (including personal attacks and insults) you make at others on FR are an indication of your lack of expertise and knowledge. To spread the misinformation you did that I have quoted here is an indication of the poor information, lies and rumors spread around the internet.
Don't you have a comment that is ON TOPIC?
Aren't you forgetting Clinton's need to get our minds off the Monica Mess and our supposed 'fixation' with his bent wienie? I don't buy what you are saying at all. I have American friends who live in Europe and they all said that when Clinton ordered all that bombing, the Europeans did not see it they way they are seeing this current round of war. They were actually afraid of Clinton because they knew that if he could let loose on Bosnia with flimsy evidence, he could bomb the hell out of them also.
1. If Clinton thought any subject would damage his poll ratings he covered it up.
2. If Clinton was not sure if a particular subject would hurt is poll ratings he would cover it up.
If given a choice to tell the truth or lie about a particular subject Clinton would choose to lie. He really was and is pathalogical.
I don't understand?_Jim 'conspiracy pinheads' RedBloodHound: p.s. DO try to avoid personal attacks; this thread was not started as a personal attack against or about you.Are you taking direct offense?
Is this your way of 'claimimg' to be a 'conspiracy pinhead'?
You KNOW what they say - "If the shoe fits ...
(LOL! Political Correctness finally rears it's head on FR - and it's the TIN FOIL CROWD, the LOONS that are up in arms! LOL!!!!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.