Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/16/2001 11:53:34 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: TLBSHOW
It is a crusade. We better figure this out.
2 posted on 09/16/2001 11:57:18 AM PDT by IonInsights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
“They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”

2 wrongs do not make a right. We can not FORCE conversion of christianity on anybody!!

3 posted on 09/16/2001 11:58:36 AM PDT by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Gomes is lecturing those of us who want to kill them before they kill us.

Like many here on Free Republic, they see themselves as enlightened and thoughtful.

In this war, these people will be useless.

4 posted on 09/16/2001 11:58:42 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Interesting new evangelical method. Point a gun to their head and say accept Christianity or die. Wait a minute, this isn't new, that's the radical Muslim way to convert the infidel.
5 posted on 09/16/2001 12:09:04 PM PDT by NickDixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Yes, Ann went a little overboard, but the author didn't say anything about Pencildick Jennings, Damn Blather, or Tommy Brokenjaw irrational, irresponsible comments, so the author has lost credibility. Then again, do any journalists other than those at FoxNews have any credibility these days?
7 posted on 09/16/2001 12:22:19 PM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Coulter's remark was obviously ironic, playing to the expectations of the left and their easily provoked over-reactions to anything Christian. She has blood in her eye after the death of Barbara Olson.

Go ahead, excommunicate her from the Church of Political Correctness. Like, who cares?

8 posted on 09/16/2001 12:25:34 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
What's the problem here?

Ann is pissed off like the rest of us Patriotic Americans!

9 posted on 09/16/2001 12:25:41 PM PDT by HoustonKevin (Ann Needs Here Own CNN Program!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Here is her article.

September 14, 2001

This is war

Barbara Olson kept her cool. In the hysteria and terror of hijackers herding passengers to the rear of the plane, she retrieved her cell phone and called her husband, Ted, the solicitor general of the United States. She informed him that he had better call the FBI -- the plane had been hijacked. According to reports, Barbara was still on the phone with Ted when her plane plunged in a fiery explosion directly into the Pentagon.

Barbara risked having her neck slit to warn the country of a terrorist attack. She was a patriot to the very end.

This is not to engage in the media's typical hallucinatory overstatement about anyone who is the victim of a horrible tragedy. The furtive cell phone call was an act of incredible daring and panache. If it were not, we'd be hearing reports of a hundred more cell phone calls. (Even people who swear to hate cell phones carry them for commercial air travel.)

The last time I saw Barbara in person was about three weeks ago. She generously praised one of my recent columns and told me I had really found my niche. Ted, she said, had taken to reading my columns aloud to her over breakfast.

I mention that to say three things about Barbara. First, she was really nice. A lot of people on TV seem nice, but aren't. (And some who don't seem nice, are.) But Barbara was always her charming, graceful, ebullient self. "Nice" is an amazingly rare quality among writers. In the opinion business, bitter, jealous hatred is the norm. Barbara had reason to be secure.

Second, it was actually easy to imagine Ted reading political columns aloud to Barbara at the breakfast table. Theirs was a relationship that could only be cheaply imitated by Bill and Hillary -- the latter being a subject of Barbara's appropriately biting best seller, "Hell to Pay."

Hillary claimed preposterously in the Talk magazine interview that she discussed policy with Bill while cutting his grapefruit in the morning. Ted and Barbara really did talk politics -- and really did have breakfast together.

It's "Ted and Barbara" just like it's Fred and Ginger, and George and Gracie. They were so perfect together, so obvious, that their friends were as happy they were on their wedding day. This is more than the death of a great person and patriotic American. It's a human amputation.

Third, since Barbara's compliment, I've been writing my columns for Ted and Barbara. I'm always writing to someone in my head. Now I don't know who to write to. Ted and Barbara were a good muse.

Apart from hearing that this beautiful light has been extinguished from the world, only one other news flash broke beyond the numbingly omnipresent horror of the entire day. That evening, CNN reported that bombs were dropping in Afghanistan -- and then updated the report to say they weren't our bombs.

They should have been ours. I want them to be ours.

This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals directly involved in this particular terrorist attack. Those responsible include anyone anywhere in the world who smiled in response to the annihilation of patriots like Barbara Olson.

We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who ordered this specific attack. We don't need an "international coalition." We don't need a study on "terrorism." We certainly didn't need a congressional resolution condemning the attack this week.

The nation has been invaded by a fanatical, murderous cult. And we welcome them. We are so good and so pure we would never engage in discriminatory racial or "religious" profiling.

People who want our country destroyed live here, work for our airlines, and are submitted to the exact same airport shakedown as a lumberman from Idaho. This would be like having the Wehrmacht immigrate to America and work for our airlines during World War II. Except the Wehrmacht was not so bloodthirsty.

"All of our lives" don't need to change, as they keep prattling on TV. Every single time there is a terrorist attack -- or a plane crashes because of pilot error -- Americans allow their rights to be contracted for no purpose whatsoever.

The airport kabuki theater of magnetometers, asinine questions about whether passengers "packed their own bags," and the hostile, lumpen mesomorphs ripping open our luggage somehow allowed over a dozen armed hijackers to board four American planes almost simultaneously on Bloody Tuesday. (Did those fabulous security procedures stop a single hijacker anyplace in America that day?)

Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now.

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.

16 posted on 09/16/2001 12:44:45 PM PDT by Star Traveler (aldebaran6640@hotmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
It's not a pageant, it's a war.
18 posted on 09/16/2001 12:50:35 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
I agree with everything she said, other than converting them to Christianity.

Finding a new religion at my age would be tough.

19 posted on 09/16/2001 12:54:45 PM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
"Inside.com" castigated Ann Coulter and she, like Jerry Falwell, have made some of the most wisest and insightful comments yet on the answer to last Tuesday's disaster. In essence, Coulter and Falwell believe sin exacts a cost, there's a price to pay for breaking God's law, and apart from obeying the Holy Bible there's no hope for the expansion of peace and prosperity.

Whenever the messenger is verbally attacked you can generally assume the author is accurate and the opposition is rattled to the core. Coulter is exactly right. We're obligated by God to defend our nation and to evangelize the world so that false religions such as Islam no longer keep men captive to falsehood and its fallout. Caring for Muslims involves sharing with them the gospel of Jesus Christ.

23 posted on 09/16/2001 1:06:18 PM PDT by Hubie59 (sparris1@tampabay.rr.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Its a start.

Ann's a sweetheart. I had lunch with her just two weeks ago.

26 posted on 09/16/2001 1:10:36 PM PDT by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
President Bush just said on TV that this was a "crusade". Both he and Ann are correct.
38 posted on 09/16/2001 1:32:34 PM PDT by bazbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
'gomer' gomes! the shrinking minority of little yapping rats.
39 posted on 09/16/2001 1:32:42 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Right on, Ann. It's about time that someone stood up and proclaimed the Christian aspect of this. No more feel good, chicken-soup-for-the-soul religious jibber-jabber. This latest outrageous atrocity is in line with the teaching of Islamic jihad--holy war--and has been practiced against Western Civilization for thousands of years. It's the same now as in the day of the Crusades, as even as far back as the attack against the Eastern Roman Empire and the conquering of Constaninople, now Istanbul. Islam has as one of its tenets not peaceful coexistence, not conversion to their religion, but the conquering of the infidels and their total destruction. There is not a drive to convert, but simply to annihilate! The terrorists made no demands; they made no statements on Tuesday. Why? They want nothing from us--nothing except our destruction. Wake up, Freepers, this is a holy war, a jihad and we either react accordingly Western Civilization and Christianity WILL perish!
41 posted on 09/16/2001 1:34:08 PM PDT by Ky_Patriot (rogerford_41502@yahoo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.

This has to be the most idiotic thing she ever said. Huge credibility loss.
42 posted on 09/16/2001 1:34:25 PM PDT by Economist_MA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Joseph Gnome can't understand Ann is being ironic.
61 posted on 09/16/2001 2:17:09 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
What is it with these people? We lose thousands, and we're supposed to retaliate by not lighting the national Christmas tree?
65 posted on 09/17/2001 4:16:51 PM PDT by neutrino (Neutrino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Ah, yes ... the bastion of liberal thought: National Review. According to them, invading the country that attacked us, killing their leaders, and converting the rest to Christianity = HATE. But is it all of those things -- or merely converting the rest to Christianity that they oppose so much?
67 posted on 09/17/2001 4:30:14 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
I love Barbara Olson and I love Ann. In this column Ann expresses concisely how we all feeling about the lost of Barbara. This is a great evil that has come upon our land…but it is also possible to bring greater evil into the world if caution and patience is not exercised in redressing this diabolical threat. There is no doubt that we are at war, but we don’t have to wage the war that bin Laden wants. He wants a crusade against him…and he may get it…but I would argue for some initial responses which would actually be more harmful to him and his cause. I’m a graduate student of Middle East history who spent last year on a fellowship to Israel. I’m not claiming this makes me an expert on what has gone on, but I do think I can offer some legitimate arguments for exercising some patience.

Follow this link to the rest of my essay:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ba77fe861ee.htm

71 posted on 09/18/2001 12:35:28 PM PDT by Heuristic Hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson