Madonna - the next Jane Fonda? boycott hollywood....

yahoo.com ^ | Saturday September 15 3:29 PM ET | Reuters

[potlatch]

I can't believe Madonna saying "violence begets violence". Where has she been the last couple of years - has she ever told any of her big movie producer friends about that!?! She wants her "out of wedlock" children to grow up happy and safe. well i think sl_tty behaveur[sp?] begets sl_tty behaveur, and i'd like my children to grow up happy and free from that!

[He Rides A White Horse]

I imagine her next project will be to seek an Afghan sperm donor.

[Teacup]

Hit all of these liberal anti American Hollywood types where it hurts. In the pocket. I agree. Enough is enough.

[PatrioticAmerican]

We are thinking globally...bombing, of course.

[AntiTyrant]

The Brits may not mind having clothing made from their flag, but this is complete disrespect for our flag!
you're absolutely right! she should mail me that skirt so i can, um, properly dispose of it.

[AntiTyrant]

What do you expect from a self-centered bimbo who calls herself after the mother of Jesus?
uh... i don't think she had much to do with naming herself.

[grego]

Madonna is a low class ugly no talent who only got famous when she simulated masterbation and conducted herself in a slutty manner only to get attention in the name of her so called "art"! She has managed to corrupt a whole generation while making money off of Americans (especially in New York City) So where is this whore's allegiance now? Hey based on her phony British accent, I guess she is tooooo global for the United States.

[Wondervixen]

Entertainment Weekly had a humorous segment on Madonna-the-whore and her Hollyweird producer husband recently.

In the "WHO'S HOT" spotlight, they mentioned Madonna because her Hollywierd Producer husband would be producing her next movie.

In the "WHO'S NOT" spotlight, they mentioned Madonna's Husband because he now has to produce her next movie.

LMAO

[Sabertooth]

Did you notice that Madonna named her first-born "Lourdes?"

[MarkL]

Dear Madonna,

I realize that as an "artist," history means very little to your daily life. I'd like to mention one name from history that you might reflect upon... His name was Neville Chamberlain, and was a Minister for Great Britain in the 1930's. He signed what was in effect, a non-aggression pact with NAZI Germany, and upon returning home to England, he declared "Peace in our time!"

Unfortunately, Hitler and the NAZIs used the pact to develop their military strength, and later, nearly took over all of Europe. We are now in a similar situation. The United States has taken little or no action to numerous terrorist attacks, and that only seems to embolden the terrorists. We are at a crossroads, where we can simply reflect that we don't want to escallate the violence, like Barbara Lee, or we can say, "ENOUGH!!!"

The saying that "fighting never solves anything," is only said by those either unable or unwilling to fight. There are some things that are worth fighting for... For instance, would you be willing to fight for the children that you claim to love? This time, the terrorists used passenger airliners... Next time, it might be anthrax, or even a nuclear weapon...

Give it some thought...

Mark

[NetValue]

Message to Mad Donna, Osama bin Laden, and peaceful christians:

"For he (the ruler) is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain; for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil."

Romans 13:4

[AntiTyrant]

yes. anything she does i put in my psycho scrapbook. lol.

[Paranoid-Pessimist]

These disgusting celebrities continue to mistake talent for brains. SHUT THE F... up, material bitch!

[Dick Bachert]

Look, folks, do we have a right to expect any more from this -- this -- morally and artistically challenged BIMBO who calls her production company "SLUTCO?"

Madonna is simply one of the most recent proofs of H.L.Mencken's declaration that "No one will EVER go broke underestimating the taste of the American people."

(8 years + of the Clintons worried me. Bush seems to indicate that there MAY be hope for our recovery.)

[Cinnamon Girl]

I saw a disturbing interview of Madonna fans outside the Staples Center. Some expressed feeling squeamish about attending their idol's filthy display so soon after the massive loss of life, but then one "guy" bounced up and down giddly and declared that he's been waiting all summer for the Madonna show and he "just had to go!" Others claimed that they'd spent a lot of money on the tickets and well, they had to go.

[wayne_shrugged]

I apologize on behalf of my state for inflicting this disgrace on the rest of the country. In our defense though, she wanted to bolt my state as soon as she could.

And to where did she bolt? NYC...

Poor NYC -- yet ANOTHER tragedy wrought on it.

[Churchillspirit]

"i don't think she had much to do with naming herself"

Really!!

Are you saying that she was given that name at birth?

Seriously, I have no interest in this woman's biography, but you seem to have knowledge concerning her early days. Goo, goo, goo....

[He Rides A White Horse]

Schizophrenic Hollywood. Go figure.

[AntiTyrant]

Are you saying that she was given that name at birth?
yup. madonna louise ciccone, born 8/16/58. i know this because i was the attending physician. as i wrote in my doctor's log later that evening, while nursing a beer and massaging my left foot, which curiously had developed what i shall refer to as a slight, compunctory alopecurus pratensis:

Born August 16, 1958 in Bay City, Michigan to a lower-middle class Italian-Catholic household, Madonna Louise Ciccone was the third and eldest daughter of Chrysler engineer Sylvio (Tony) Ciccone and French-Canadienne Madonna Fortin, for whom the future superstar was named. 'Veronica' was added to her name upon confirmation.

so that would be, just for review: madonna louise veronica ciccone

be sure to get your FREE madonna screen saver!

[AntiTyrant]

The United States has taken little or no action to numerous terrorist attacks, and that only seems to embolden the terrorists.
many completely ignore even the possibility that the united states participated at all in unnecessarily provoking them; it was all just because we didn't reach out and touch them enough with our multiple personality style foreign policy, supporting one despot one day, decrying his very existence the next -- all backed up by tremendous killing and disruptive power.

i'm prepared, if you respond, to get the same knee-jerk reaction seen most of last week toward anybody who even posits the notion that perhaps the united states should change its foreign policy to avoid unnecessarily aggravating, and in some cases nurturing these groups and their leaders (e.g., hussein, bin laden), or supporting tyrants within their countries (e.g., the shah of iran) via incessant cia action. so . . . no, i am not suggesting or otherwise associating with the idea that we should not react militarily to the 9/11 and previous attacks. i expect that to be completely ignored by anybody reading this, btw.

Next time, it might be anthrax, or even a nuclear weapon...
exactly. which is why we should take a long, hard look at why some of these terrorists are so angry in the first place, and see if perhaps we've been stepping on toes w/o getting any benefit. again, taking such intelligent action does not mean that one can't take other action as well. i have zero idea why so many normally intelligent (seemingly) freepers assume that, or see it as a sign of weakness. the stakes are much too high to let blind pride weigh in over reality. these people are angry over something, and they definitely claim to be angry because of our actions, not our inaction. ignore that at OUR peril. we're all in this together, and i'm not impressed by 95% of the blather. i think it's going to get more of us killed.