Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is no pearl harbor
TownHall.com ^ | Thursday, September 13, 2001 | by Robert Novak

Posted on 09/12/2001 8:27:38 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

TownHall.com: Conservative Columnists: Robert Novak
QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW

townhall.com

Robert Novak (back to story)

September 13, 2001

This is no pearl harbor

WASHINGTON -- Security experts and airline officials agree privately that the simultaneous hijacking of four jetliners was an "inside job," probably indicating complicity beyond malfeasance. This makes all the more ominous Tuesday's national catastrophe and its dismal consequences.

Nobody was more vigorous Tuesday in demanding tough military reprisal against the terrorists than former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger. However, he was virtually alone in directing his rage not only at the assassins but also at security arrangements. "I thought we had solved that problem (of air skyjackings)," he said. He pointed out that effective airport security would have prevented the disaster that may exceed the 2,403 deaths in the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

The analogy with the Japanese surprise attack was drawn endlessly by political leaders and journalists. Former Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, with a keen sense of history, disagreed: "This, after all, was not Pearl Harbor. We have not lost the Pacific fleet." Unlike Dec. 7, 1941, the second day of infamy was not perpetrated by an enemy that at that time was militarily superior and seemed to put this nation's very existence in question.

In the rage and mourning following Tuesday's disaster, few officials wanted to dwell on how a 10-year hiatus of airline hijackings in this country could be followed by four in one hour. At a minimum, the blame can be put on ill-trained, incompetent personnel performing the screening of passengers. At the worst, security experts fear collusion with the terrorists, possibly even extending to the cockpit. This is a subject that the airlines are loathe to discuss.

The immediate consequence, widely predicted by members of Congress, will be tighter security making life more difficult for airline travelers and other Americans. The instant security measures taken in Washington and around the country came after the greatest terrorist success in world history had run its course and would not have been effective in preventing disaster had it been put in place.

Of greater interest to members of congressional intelligence committees is the surprise element of the attacks. The CIA and FBI are internally at a low point of effectiveness. "Human intelligence" (spying) has been in decline for decades. No amount of security harassment of airline passengers will substitute for effective intelligence. Like Pearl Harbor, the lack of warning Sept. 11 will be investigated.

Unlike Pearl Harbor, however, there is no clear foe. While secret briefings of members of Congress point to Osama bin Laden as the source of the attacks, President Bush's Tuesday night address to the nation named no names. The government, at this writing, actually is not sure. Private sources indicate that the terrorists could be a splinter group of Osama, its identity and whereabouts as yet unknown.

An attack on Afghanistan for sheltering Osama's terrorists will put the United States in danger of being perceived, however incorrectly, as launching a holy war against Islam. There is strong sentiment in Congress for hitting somebody, somewhere who has unsavory terrorist credentials even if not connected with Tuesday's attack.

With a crippled CIA unable to target the assassins, the Bush administration seems headed to deliver the same kind of hammer blows that the Clinton administration used in the Kosovo war rather than surgical strikes aimed at the assassins.

Perhaps the biggest difference with Pearl Harbor is the cause of the conflict. Bush's eloquent call for unity talked of the need to "defend freedom." Unlike Nazi Germany's and Imperial Japan's drive for a new world order, however, the hatred toward the U.S. by the terrorists is an extension of its hatred of Israel rather than world dominion. Secretary of State Colin Powell's laudable efforts at being an even-handed peacemaker makes no difference to terrorists.

Stratfor.com, the private intelligence company, reported Tuesday: "The big winner today, intentionally or not, is the state of Israel." Whatever distance Bush wanted between U.S. and Israeli policy, it was eliminated by terror. The spectacle on television of Palestinian youths and mothers dancing in the streets of East Jerusalem over the slaughter of Americans will not soon be forgotten. The United States and Israel are brought ever closer in a way that cannot improve long-term U.S. policy objectives.

Contact Robert Novak

©2001 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

townhall.com

QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW

For Education And Disscussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/12/2001 8:27:38 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
""The United States and Israel are brought ever closer in a way that cannot improve long-term U.S. policy objectives. "

Does this jerk want the US to snuggle up to the terrorists?

What a stupid clymer.

2 posted on 09/12/2001 8:33:54 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I wish Novak would take those big pearly fake teeth out of his mouth so I could drop kick them back in.

I think I could score from 20 yards out. Maybe 30.

Bill Kristol...you are next...

3 posted on 09/12/2001 8:34:05 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I wish Novak would take those big pearly fake teeth out of his mouth so I could drop kick them back in.
I think I could score from 20 yards out. Maybe 30.


Thanks for my first laugh in 2 days...really, the visual has me ROFL!
Thanks again. :)
4 posted on 09/12/2001 8:43:19 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Novak, sadly, seems out of touch on this issue. If selective assasination, alone, was the solution to this problem, that would be great. It's not that simple.
5 posted on 09/12/2001 8:43:45 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Perhaps the biggest difference with Pearl Harbor is the cause of the conflict

then again, perhaps not Bob.........

While both events were horrible, dispicable acts, the biggest difference, and what makes the WTC attack so much more devastating than Pearl Harbor is that, unlike Pearl Harbor, this attack took place in peactime, not war, and was perpetrated against thousands of innocent civilians (Pentagon attack excepted) as opposed to military personnel who knew that there was an inherent risk in their duties.

6 posted on 09/12/2001 8:48:51 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
On most issues, Novak is usually right on the money; on the mideast, however, he seems to have a penchant for being way off the mark.
7 posted on 09/12/2001 8:52:05 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Well said -- I couldn't agree with you more.
8 posted on 09/12/2001 8:53:24 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Hey....maybe we have something here. A computer game. "Bop the Mole!" with Dan Rather. A toupee toss with Peter Jennings. See how many marbles you can stuff in Tom Brokaws mouth before his head explodes....endless possibilities.
9 posted on 09/12/2001 8:56:57 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
There is strong sentiment in Congress for hitting somebody, somewhere who has unsavory terrorist credentials even if not connected with Tuesday's attack. How 'bout Gary Condit and Saddam Hussein in that order just as a warm up.
10 posted on 09/12/2001 9:18:58 PM PDT by Grim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Moronic article from Novak. Blaming mass murder on poor airport security is like blaming school shootings on the availability of guns.
11 posted on 09/12/2001 9:41:20 PM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Tauzero
hatred toward the U.S. by the terrorists is an extension of its hatred of Israel rather than world dominion. Secretary of State Colin Powell's laudable efforts at being an even-handed peacemaker makes no difference to terrorists.

They are evil, evil must perish. They are the disease WE ARE THE CURE!!!!!!!!

13 posted on 09/13/2001 9:25:59 AM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
You're no cure. You're a nazi.
14 posted on 09/13/2001 9:31:29 AM PDT by aspide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aspide
You're a bleeding heart Liberal. Our nation's welfare depends on our ability to annihilate Iraq, Bin-Laden, and all of his kind.
15 posted on 09/13/2001 10:11:19 AM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Police should be running baggage security.

Marshals should be on every flight.

And airline pilots should be armed. Most are ex-military and the ones who aren't should be trained with weapons and armed.

Flight attendants should be given the option of carry tasers or mace.

16 posted on 09/13/2001 12:31:18 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Novak is a self-hating Jew (actually ex-Jew) who has been shilling for Arafat for years.

If I could talk to Novak, I would say to him, "Bob, if they ever come for the Jews, they will come for you too, no matter how many Jew-hater asses you kiss, you traitor bastard."

17 posted on 09/13/2001 9:22:48 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: All
As God's grace goes out to all those suffering from this attack, and comforting all those in recovery efforts ...

Pearl Harbor was NOT a surprise attack. It was the price FDR and his War Cabinet willingly paid for The United States entry into WWII.

Pearl Harbor should not be compared to the WTC as a surprise attack.

19 posted on 09/17/2001 8:50:51 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson