Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Acts Of War': Bush Steps Up Rhetoric, Calls Attacks 'Acts Of War' (posted 9/12/01)
CBSNEWS ^ | Wednesday, September 12, 2001 | [Liberal] Commentary By CBS News Senior Political Editor Dotty Lynch

Posted on 09/12/2001 7:22:45 PM PDT by JohnHuang2


WASHINGTON, Sept. 12, 2001
AP
President Bush addresses the nation Tuesday night.
(CBS) In her latest Political Points commentary, CBS News Senior Political Editor Dotty Lynch takes a look at President Bush's response to the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

President George W. Bush ratcheted up his rhetoric Wednesday calling the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon "acts of war" — a much tougher George Bush than appeared in the Oval Office address on Tuesday. Last night he was somber and reassuring, reciting the 23rd Psalm. Wednesday's talk was of retaliation and action. Surrounded by two men who helped his father carry out the Persian Gulf War, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Colin Powell, he said the acts were "more than acts of terror, they were acts of war" and vowed the U.S. "would win this war."

In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday's shocking and confusing events, happening at a time when both the president and Secretary of State were out of Washington, there was a vacuum in administration voices reacting to the attacks. President Bush was whisked from Florida to Louisiana to Omaha making a short videotaped statement at midday. For a time, the White House seemed to be caught off guard about what to say and who should say it. Responding to criticism Wednesday about the president's slowness in returning to Washington, Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said it was because they had "credible evidence" that both the White House and Air Force One may have been targeted.

While there was no sweaty and shaken version of Alexander Haig claiming to be "in charge", many in government (including some key administration advisors) were critical that Bush was under cover and that no one in the Bush foreign policy chain was making public statements. The airwaves were dominated by former Clinton administration officials: Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger, Tony Lake, James Woolsey and Richard Holbrooke. Members of Congress were also giving interviews but many were in the dark since formal briefings were postponed until the president was back and had been briefed.

By Wednesday morning the Bush administration was taking pains to show it was back in stride. The day started with the president's statement at his Cabinet meeting and there were briefings by all the key Cabinet officials: Powell, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI Director Robert Meuller, FEMA Director Joe Albaugh.

The overnight polls showed that the public by 2-1 believes this was "another Pearl Harbor" and by the same margin they believe the attacks would result in the U.S. going to war. Sixty-six percent said that the United States should retaliate.

While the public, the Congress and the world community are coming together to condemn the action, there are undercurrents of criticism and concern. The public believes that the attacks could have been prevented and that U.S. intelligence should have known about the plans in advance. Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress seem prepared to give President Bush the political and financial support he's asked for and to reserve criticism for a later day.

For now, President Bush seems to have carte blanche to take retaliatory measures and spend whatever it takes to restore order and prevent further attacks. But, the new president and his administration are under intense scrutiny and a nervous public is watching and praying that they will be up to the task of restoring the confidence of the American people.


©MMI, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved.

For Education And Disscussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2001; actsofwar

1 posted on 09/12/2001 7:22:48 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Leave it to CBS (Can Blather Spew), and probably the rest of the liberal news networks as well, to call our President's words - in this time of grave national crises - Rhetoric They usually have nothing more than Drivel to spout, anyway. LVM
2 posted on 09/12/2001 7:34:13 PM PDT by LasVegasMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
Exactly. The flipside: Everything which spewed from the orifice of their darling golden boy, X42, was GOSPEL
3 posted on 09/12/2001 7:37:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The airwaves were dominated by former Clinton administration officials: Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger, Tony Lake, James Woolsey and Richard Holbrooke.

Well, well, well. Who selects these people? The media. I wondered about this too. Why did the press interview Sandy Berger? Answer: liberals interview liberals whenever they can. They can anticipate the answers better so it flows better and makes for a better presentation.

4 posted on 09/12/2001 7:38:56 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
These idiots were on the TV because they don't have jobs.

The Bush team was at work and the freekin press needs to say this.

5 posted on 09/12/2001 7:55:29 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
LOL!
6 posted on 09/13/2001 6:08:05 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; JohnHuang2

Bump.


7 posted on 06/18/2004 3:56:14 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

If CBS does not call the attacks an act of war then they must have an IQ lower than whale manure. CBS is a left-wing organization that is keeping with its agenda to put a left-winger in power. While by doing so they are committing treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy; in this world war of survival for free people. For if the terrorist win there will be no freedom and come to think of it no CBS either. So I would guess that they are trying to bring on their own destruction.


8 posted on 06/18/2004 4:06:42 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson