1 posted on
09/12/2001 7:14:10 PM PDT by
blake6900
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: blake6900
Maybe he's running cover for the Canadians. It strikes me, they are one of the key "harbors" for our enemies.
2 posted on
09/12/2001 7:17:57 PM PDT by
Paraclete
To: blake6900
Be sure and tell them that you will be selling your Disney stock (even if you don't own any) and will be advising others to do likewise. The only thing the assholes will understand is keeping him on the air will hit them in their pocketbooks.
3 posted on
09/12/2001 7:23:05 PM PDT by
SCHROLL
To: blake6900
4 posted on
09/12/2001 7:24:45 PM PDT by
glock rocks
(eat a frog, peter)
To: blake6900
Done..and thank you for link
5 posted on
09/12/2001 7:25:39 PM PDT by
OPU48
To: blake6900
Thanks for the heads-up. I sent them the following note,
"Peter Jennings is a disgrace to our nation. Perhaps his only excuse is that he isn't of our nation and thus cares not what happens to us.
His blatent anti-Presidential partisanship at a time of national emergency was shocking and sickening.
I doubt that you care as this sort of unprofessionalism has been his standard for many years. I will be forwarding copies of this note to any advertiser I see upon your network. If appeals to objectivity (a principle that I THOUGHT was supposed to be a cornerstone of journalism) cannot sway you, perhaps a threat of economic damage will be more effective."
6 posted on
09/12/2001 7:25:40 PM PDT by
phothus
To: blake6900
Jennings has no business making political commentary during news casts. I am tired of liberals in the media doing this, and every time they do it they are violating federal election laws. We should start e-mailing the Federal Election Commission each time they make campaign points for the Democrats, especially at times like this. Jennings is a sick and depraved individual to think about parties and politics at a time like this.
To: blake6900
Done (with relish).
9 posted on
09/12/2001 7:28:06 PM PDT by
Darheel
To: blake6900
Freeped that Donut head and his network but good.
To: blake6900
Let me put it this way. I'd email 'em..........but I have to go to the john and pinch off a Jennings.
To: blake6900
I was ugly.
15 posted on
09/12/2001 7:35:37 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: blake6900
The comments made yesterday by Peter Jennings about President Bush were a disgrace. Until he is fired from his current position, I will boycott any advertiser foolish enough to pay for a minute of programming that features this anti-American jackanape. Rest assured that I, along with my friends and family, will be contacting the advertisers to let them know this!
To: blake6900
BUMP....done yesterday
18 posted on
09/12/2001 7:38:05 PM PDT by
apackof2
To: blake6900
Thanks. Message sent.
21 posted on
09/12/2001 7:42:11 PM PDT by
Rocky
To: blake6900
My email to ABC:
I am absolutely sickened by the biased, unintelligent, and thoughtless coverage by Peter Jennings on the attack on the US.
His constant questioning regarding the 'mental capacity' of President Bush totally undermines this country, especially in a time when the country needs to be united behind the President. In addition, Mr. Jennings continual whining regarding not knowing where the President was in route to yesterday was incredibly selfish, unintelligent, thoughtless, and just plain stupid. If the average American can understand why his whereabouts are not revealed, then why and the world can't a national television news anchor? And now that we know that Air Force One and the White House were targets, Mr. Jennings thoughtless whining makes me sick.
I vowed to never watch your network after the election coverage and made the mistake of tuning in yesterday when I thought I'd see objective coverage.
I will not make that mistake again.
22 posted on
09/12/2001 7:43:05 PM PDT by
rintense
To: blake6900
Thanks!
I intended to do this, and you have made it easier. It's done. I feel better.
23 posted on
09/12/2001 7:44:02 PM PDT by
altura
To: blake6900
How do you spell
jennings sucks!
24 posted on
09/12/2001 7:44:45 PM PDT by
lonestar
To: blake6900
Posted my response. FYI - here it is:
To whom it may concern:
During this time of national crisis, while I have been unusually impressed by the behavior of most politicians, of both parties, in their public comments, I have, however, been quite distressed by the reporting of Peter Jennings, and his persistence in criticising President Bush - even going as far to suggest that this tragedy was somehow caused by our president taking a hands-off approach in the Middle East crisis. Putting aside, for the moment, the completely inappropriate timing of such a suggestion, let me point out that we now know that terrorists began planning for this attack as early as July of 2000, when the hijackers enrolled in pilot traning classes. This was before President Bush was even elected, and during a time when the United States, under the leadership of former President Clinton, was intensely involved in the Middle East crisis. Indeed, many at the time suggested that President Clinton's intense efforts to achieve peace in that region were motivated by his desparate search for a legacy, to replace the scandals that had scarred his presidency. Indeed, others also speculated that President Clinton's bombing of the Sudan may have been motivated, in part, by his desire to detract attention from these scandals.
So if we're going to inappropriately speculate about blame, let's at least have a basis in reality. These terrorists do not want peace, and when the United States was pushing for peace, we became their enemy. These terrorists do not want their factories bombed and their leaders killed, and when we dropped bombs on them, we became their enemy. This makes sense. But saying that President Bush's reasonable decision that United States cannot set the timetable for peace is somehow the cause, is not reasonable.
Also, no matter what provoked these terrorists to target the United States - whether or not it was actions taken or not taken by presidents Clinton or Bush - it is completely irrelevent, because in either case, under no decent code of human behavior are their actions justifiable. These are the actions of irrational, perverted, evil creatures. I can't even call them animals, they are even lower forms of life than this. Even animals have more honorable codes of behavior. So when you try to explain the behavior of these creatures by trying to understand their provocation, you elevate them to the status of rational, thinking human beings. And they do not deserve this status.
To: blake6900
Done....Jennings has really pissed me off.
To: blake6900
***
I've just about had a belly-full of this asshole.***Definitly, a change of diet is indicated.
To: blake6900
I am happy to see these posts. At first, I thought it may be just me who thinks this way about Jennings. He is a disgrace, as is ABC. Perhaps they are both on Osama Bin Laden's payroll.
29 posted on
09/12/2001 7:53:39 PM PDT by
jporcus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson