I served my country, and I'm nothing like those people at all. That is NOT the analogy to be drawn here at all.
First off calling me names, only screams out how much of a liberal baiter you are. Second, you tell people they're wrong for wanting something that biblically is right. Third you come off like you're some how morally superior to the people in this thread, and have gone out of your way to use language that makes anyone who wants retibution to look like a primitive caveman.
Some of us are pretty sick and tired of liberalism. Some of us are pretty tired of political correctness. Some of would prefer the truth, and not a clinical version of what is a very dirty deed. Thinking clearly is important. Being rational is important. Both of these states of mind are severely important. Being compassionate is not. War is not about compassion. War is about winning pure and simple. The Russians spent a lot of time, and lost a lot of troops in Afghanistan. Why do you think they are fully behind America? Because they know what it's like to fight those people.
I would suggest a unified front here in America. Not one where people are calling names, or being indecisive about what should be done. Ideally what we want is simple. We want the people who did this to pay. The problem is that liberals only want them to pay a little, and the majority of America wants them to pay a lot. I'm willing to make things even, and not be overzealous in our retribution. However, that's not going to make a difference. The only way in the world to make it so this never happens again, is to make sure that there's nobody left to harbor any ill will.
That means all enemies, foreign and Domestic to pay.
I don't think I'm a disgrace to my country in the least. Nor do I think you are, however get something straight. I don't appreciate name calling, nor do I think it's nice to be uppity, especially when we're all supposed to be on the same side here.
So do I, the people who did this, and those who knowingly aided them.
A better way to explain it, is to find a village full of innocent people in Afghanistan, approximately 5000 people, and drop one big bomb on them.
Kinda funny that in one sentence you agree with me that we want to make the guilty people pay, then you suggest killing innocent people.
That should make things equal.
It makes you equal in evil to those who killed our innocent citizens.
Of course with the way things are escalating, and the more pieces of the puzzle we see, it becomes more complex, and therefore we have to shift gameplans.
Sounds like you are a little more confused with each new piece of information, maybe you should have thought of that before you advocated killing millions of innocents. ( before you scaled your death wish list to a mere 5000 innocents in a small villiage)
We don't know who to put blame on at this point, so all of this is nothing more than heresay and conjecture until we have hard answers and proof.
Thats what I have been advocating all along, but you and your ilk have demonized me and told me I was being morally superior for not stooping to your baser instincts.
I'm not in charge, and never would want to be in a time like this.
Thank God for that.
I do feel the same way as a lot of people do here in middle America, that our country has been attacked, and retribution is called for.
So do I, but I don't think a lot of people in middle America want to drop nuclear bombs on innocent people so they will feel better about the situation.
I think it would have been best to hand over Clinton, as he was the main person who ordered those attacks.
Thats funny, you don't advocate that for the perpetrators of this horrific act, you advocate killing innocents. You like the idea of handing over the guilty parties to save your own skin, but screw people in other counties who are saddled with leaders who they have had no say in selecting. The people in this country actually elected the likes of Clinton.
No, your thinking is evil, through and through. I can only hope that you aren't evil, just your ill thought out rage, which, if acted upon, would be unable to be rectified.