Posted on 09/12/2001 5:24:12 AM PDT by BubbaZanetti
CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong Clinton to Blame
Christopher Ruddy Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2001
The worst, single most tragic day in the history of America has just passed. Tuesday more Americans likely died than all the casualties of the Battle of Antietam on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 1862. Already the media spin on yesterday's events is relentless. The talking heads are pushing several themes, including: Now is not the time to point fingers at responsible parties in America, i.e., political figures like Clinton or our own security agencies. The events of Tuesday are the "worst-case scenario" the worst is over. Osama bin Laden is the culprit.
On these points of spin, the first one is baloney. Of course we need to find why our security failed. This is basic. And unless the big media are consulting a psychic better than the one I use, no one knows what the future days, weeks and months may yield. This is not the worst-case scenario. A worst-case scenario is a 25-megaton nuclear bomb detonated in New York or a full-scale attack against the U.S.! These should not be ruled out.
These dangers can be avoided, we pray, but only if we stop listening to the media idiots that feed us a diet of blow-dried nonsense. Is Katie Couric going to say how bad she feels for the terrorists who were driven to these cowardly acts? It is the big media and the hack politicians that led us to this nightmarish day.
Welcome to FR, newbie.
Eating our own is a time-honored practice here. I suggest you watch a while before you start in on it. Best to leave it to the professionals.
First, he posts less than HALF the article by Ruddy (without telling us that this is not the complete article). Does HONESTY mean anything to this individual?
Second, he uses the post as an occasion to DEFEND the TRAITOR CLINTON.
Third, the part he conveniently fails to post contains the damning information about Clinton that led to the article's appearance in the first place. You can read the entire Ruddy piece here: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/9/11/232727.shtml
Fourth, look at the guy's "nick." It is Bubba. This guy is a Clinton associate, in all likelihood. And, I repeat, a DISRUPTOR, using this nation's tragic loss of yesterday as an opportunity for spin control to help Clintigula.
The Clintons spent eight years dismantling security and intelligence operations and weakening the military in this country. They treated national security like a stale joke or something that just got in their way.
On a related note, FREEPERS, what influence do you think the events in NY and DC will have on efforts to move toward amnesty for illegal aliens in the U.S.? I would guess that topic will be shelved for the forseeable future.
First, he posts less than HALF the article by Ruddy (without telling us that this is not the complete article). Does HONESTY mean anything to this individual?
Second, he uses the post as an occasion to DEFEND the TRAITOR CLINTON.
Third, the part he conveniently fails to post contains the damning information about Clinton that led to the article's appearance in the first place. You can read the entire Ruddy piece here: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/9/11/232727.shtml
Fourth, look at the guy's "nick." It is Bubba. This guy is a Clinton associate, in all likelihood. And, I repeat, a DISRUPTOR, using this nation's tragic loss of yesterday as an opportunity for spin control to help Clintigula.
Excellent observatons BenR2, I read, his comment the same way you did....I was like What? Eight years of coddling and doing nothing even after numerous terrorist attacks on our military, embassies, and the first WTC bombing.....Disappearing PCs, missing files, CIA breaches, breaches in the State Dept, we had no national security and no effort to find these terrorist animals...the only thing Clintooon did, was arrest a bunch of low level scapegoats and bring them here to NYC for trial, and put them in our jails, he sunk us big time! Thanks BenR2.
|
|||||
More proof we need at least a month of silence from those who don't realize that this is a "Conservative News Forum". They obviously can't police themselves or post rationally.
I know Clinton is out of the country. But, out of curiosity, how close is the first set of offices he looked at in Manhattan to the WTC? Just asking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.