Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Airs Anti-Gun Propaganda Show 'Family Law'
Family Law ^

Posted on 09/10/2001 9:24:47 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican

Did anybody see that anti-American, anti-gun, pro-Communist, propaganda show put on by the SeeBS called "Family Law"? This was the most hateful anti-American show I have ever watched in years!

The show's basic premise was that a mother who had lost one son to suicide by gun was under court trial for having her other child removed from her because she bought another gun. The mother's lawyer's firm was trying to deny her representation because she had a gun and the law firm was anti-gun. A reluctant lawyer in the firm took the case, but the entire show spouted the usual lies and propaganda against guns. The show stated such lies as "10 children every day die from guns".

The judge ruled in favor of the mother, but stated that she would love to take very child away from every parent who had a gun, but that would mean taking 43 million families apart. The judge stated that she felt no parent had the right to have a child and a gun.

The mere fact that the show centered on someone having a trial for having a gun was so communist, I could not believe SeeBS even broadcasted the show!


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/10/2001 9:24:47 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Guns are good; ask our founding fathers.
2 posted on 09/10/2001 9:30:02 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
A couple of years ago I saw an episode of Judging Amy that was similar in its appalling hatred for traditional values. A father of a roughly 12 year old boy was forced to bow to the judge's opinion that physical punishment was verboten by the judge's threats to remove the boy to foster care! This was despite the evidence that this was a loving home, but with a father who disagreed (for religious reasons) with the judge's theories about child-rearing .

Since the person who would suffer the most from this removal was the boy, the father agreed to bend his principles to protect his son. The smug, self-righteous attitude of the lawyers and the judge were simply infuriating. They were so proud of themselves for using the power of the state to steam-roller a father by threatening his child.

I pitched the TV that night. Haven't had one since.

3 posted on 09/10/2001 9:36:29 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson