Skip to comments.
Condit Grand Jury Dismisses Obstruction Complaint
NewsMax.com ^
| 9-10-01
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 09/10/2001 6:34:56 PM PDT by lady reaper
A Stanislaus County, Calif., grand jury has dismissed a complaint against California Congressman Gary Condit charging him with suborning perjury and obstruction of justice.
James Robinson, the attorney for former Condit girlfriend Anne Marie Smith, read the grand jury's response to the complaint on "Rivera Live" Monday night.
"The Stanislaus County civil grand jury received your complaint on August 27, 2001. It is the opinion of this jury that the topic of your complaint is not properly within its jurisdiction. Therefore the panel has voted to take no further action in this matter."
Smith had charged that on four separate occasions, Condit tried to get her to lie about their affair to investigators probing the disappearance of 24-year-old intern Chandra Levy.
Appearing on "Rivera Live: with Robinson, Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman said the grand jury's decision vindicated Smith's right to file a citizen's complaint against Condit and vowed to repeat the effort in other counties with jurisdiction over the case.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: lady reaper
I've always said Condidit WILL skate just like Clinton did. (sigh)
2
posted on
09/10/2001 6:37:50 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: teletech
Bold off!
3
posted on
09/10/2001 6:38:19 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: teletech
NO BOLD!
4
posted on
09/10/2001 6:39:00 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: teletech
ok lets try this.
5
posted on
09/10/2001 6:39:30 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: teletech
(/b) off
6
posted on
09/10/2001 6:42:10 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: teletech
off duh!
7
posted on
09/10/2001 6:42:43 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: lady reaper
So what County would claim jurisdiction? I'm betting that nobody will take it on.
8
posted on
09/10/2001 6:44:37 PM PDT
by
AngrySpud
To: LisaAnne
It is the opinion of this jury that the topic of your complaint is not properly within its jurisdiction. They didn't say the complaint had no merit. A good sign?
9
posted on
09/10/2001 6:45:42 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: AngrySpud
"So what County would claim jurisdiction?"
No County, but Federal Government would have jurisdiction.
11
posted on
09/10/2001 7:12:36 PM PDT
by
marajade
(maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
To: AngrySpud
"So what County would claim jurisdiction?"
No County, but Federal Government would have jurisdiction.
12
posted on
09/10/2001 7:12:54 PM PDT
by
marajade
(maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
To: kattracks
They didn't say the complaint had no merit. A good sign? They are afraid to touch it. One person has already disappeared. They are well aware that they could be next.
That's a bad sign, I would say.
To: teletech
There is a possiblity that he could skate, but it's not over yet...so we'll see.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"One person has already disappeared. They are well aware that they could be next."
That's bologna and you know it. Grand juries make indictments in all sorts of cases, including those who are really bad guys.
15
posted on
09/10/2001 7:30:07 PM PDT
by
marajade
(maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
To: lady reaper
There is a possiblity that he could skate, but it's not over yet...so we'll see.When Rita Cosby came on with the "Breaking news" on FOX, I uttered a four letter word that I usually don't use. I apologized to my lovely wife but I am still fuming! Once again, we see that laws do not apply to RATS!
16
posted on
09/10/2001 7:32:04 PM PDT
by
teletech
To: marajade
There are 2 other counties to file in.
17
posted on
09/10/2001 7:34:05 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: teletech
Look, I'm just as disappointed as you are; however, let's be honest: the case was weak. Smith didn't follow through on Condit's request to file an affadavit. So, if he was trying to obstruct justice, he didn't do a very good job at it. Let's just find the body and charge the guy with murder. No more of this penny-ante crap.
18
posted on
09/10/2001 7:47:25 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: dalebert
I wish them luck but still say the jurisdiction resides with the Feds.
19
posted on
09/10/2001 7:47:27 PM PDT
by
marajade
(maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
To: Bush2000
Look, I'm just as disappointed as you are; however, let's be honest: the case was weak. Smith didn't follow through on Condit's request to file an affadavit. So, if he was trying to obstruct justice, he didn't do a very good job at it. Let's just find the body and charge the guy with murder. No more of this penny-ante crap.I totally agree, however finding the body is another matter. Even if they did, how would they tie this maniac to Chandra's murder? What do they say... means... motive... opportunity.... He had all three but I don't expect the DC police to connect the dots, do you?
20
posted on
09/10/2001 8:01:37 PM PDT
by
teletech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson