Skip to comments.
Bar owners seek vote to repeal ban on smoking
Boston Globe ^
| September 9, 2001
| Paul E. Kandarian
Posted on 09/10/2001 4:39:02 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:06:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Dorsey Carey considers the evening of Sept. 1 the ''Saturday night massacre.''
Carey manages Handlebar Harry's bar/restaurant in Cordage Park. It's tucked at the back of a mostly deserted retail complex, but locals have made it a destination. While other Cordage businesses vanished over the last decade, Handlebar Harry's kept the lights shining brightly. Until now.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
09/10/2001 4:39:02 PM PDT
by
Max McGarrity
(madmax@revolutionist.com)
To: PUFF_LIST, BUTTS, SMOKERS, LOUNGE
Just more "collateral damage" from the War on Smokers.
2
posted on
09/10/2001 4:40:29 PM PDT
by
Max McGarrity
(madmax@revolutionist.com)
To: Max McGarrity
Plymouth bars that violate the ban could face their own down time, Carey said. Infractions can result in $100 fines (though town officials say they will work to educate proprietors rather than impose the fines.) That line, above all others, is at the bottom of the liberal agenda. "We will educate you" or "we will indoctrinate you" have the same meaning. All we have to do as a society is to take our losses in small doses until all is lost.
It almost makes me want to start smoking again.
3
posted on
09/10/2001 5:37:02 PM PDT
by
billhilly
To: Max McGarrity
The only exemptions are private clubs... I've always wondered what a bar needs to do to qualify as a private club. Any ideas?
To: evilsmoker
I wish I knew. One of the guys should know.
5
posted on
09/10/2001 6:01:48 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
Off the subject...but I just checked your website and those Jacka** awards were hilarious!
To: evilsmoker
What constitutes a private club depends entirely on where you are, evilsmoker. Here in The People's Republik of Kalifornia, there can be no such thing because of the way the statewide ban/law is written. Which pretty much tells anyone who's interested just what the anti agenda really is, doesn't it? One bar here became a "Smoking Lounge" that was open to members only. They sold memberships for $1 and sold 600, nearly half of them to nonsmokers. The local city attorney had hissy fits when a judge agreed they were within the law, and filed another suit claiming they were engaging in "unfair business practices." Truth is, if ONE bar on top of a mountain at the end of a 25-mile dirt road in the middle of nowhere catered to smokers, some neurotic dirtbag nico-Nazi would try to get them shut down. To feel the need to control others to that extent is a mental illness.
7
posted on
09/10/2001 8:00:04 PM PDT
by
Max McGarrity
(madmax@revolutionist.com)
To: Max McGarrity
"It's another thing they're taking away from people,.."
Now guys, it's only about cigarettes. It's not like smoking cigarettes is a right guaranteed in the Constitution. Complaining about this will only minimize the *real* problems that we have to look out for. [end sarcasm]
Be prepared for the real "government knows best" crowd that lurks here. The problem is, if we keep ignoring all these little infringements, we'll be too numb to recognize it when they come for the *real* ones.
8
posted on
09/10/2001 8:53:36 PM PDT
by
Badray
(i'manonsmoker@itstillpissesmeoff.com)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson