Posted on 09/08/2001 7:26:39 PM PDT by Utah Girl
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
When we worked together in the late 1970s and early '80s -- he as a United States senator, I as a veteran commissioner of Social Security -- he was the most effective defender of the Social Security program in Congress. It was our teamwork on the Greenspan Commission in 1983 that, in his words, "literally saved Social Security for the decades that followed."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Like disheartens,disappoints,saddens these are softsmear/whine protest words. If Lieberman is on the Sunday talk shows this week just listen five minutes for more examples.
It's nice to see them try to eat their own(Moynahan, Condit)with these phrases.
Huh? I have never received one.
one is "entitled" only to whatever current law happens to be, the law can be changed at any time (and has changed frequently in the past)
little sense of proprietorship
this is as it should be, one can't and shouldn't feel very proprietary about an "entitlement" that pays exactly $255 if one dies before benefit eligibility
the annual statements they send out (of which i've gotten three) are fraudulent to the extent that they encourage people to think that the amounts they've paid are somehow "theirs" when in fact no such thing is true
the current "lock box" nonsense is an outright fraud
social security has always been nothing but a general fund pay-as-you-go welfare program disguised as a pension plan and should be fully privatized
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.