Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
I like your junk cell phone, fake names idea. Maybe Condit bought one for himself, too (with a fake name of course) Cash only tendered and no tracing of names through credit cards. Sounds interesting.
8 posted on 09/08/2001 4:54:44 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Salvation
I like your junk cell phone, fake names idea. Maybe Condit bought one for himself, too (with a fake name of course) Cash only tendered and no tracing of names through credit cards. Sounds interesting.

The fact that Gary Condit uses an alias to get his spa treatments. He actually has two... one is "Greg" the other is "Barry K." and the fact that he uses a fictitious woman's name for his girly line pager service, often paid 1 year in advance, makes me wonder about this issue.

I was at the 7-11 today, and they actually have an offer for now $49 after rebate, or $89 without a rebate for a cell phone that you buy phone cards for, and pay as you go.

Either Condit broke up with Chandra in early April, or he had to have had a way of contacting her other than her own cell phone that mom and dad were actually paying the bills for in actuality.

Mike Isikoff went over the records, and there is basically just a couple calls from Condit to Chandra or reversed the last two weeks before she vanished. There was no call recorded on the 22nd, 23rd, or 24th. So, I ask again, how did Chandra know to show up at Condit's condo and he would be there? Did they arrange the date 4 or 5 days in advance? Did she just show up unannounced, he let her in, and she spent the night? Or did she have a special phone from Condit? Could even explain why she left the apartment without her regular cell phone.

She gets a call from Condit on the secret cell phone at 12:20. "I am meeting with the VP for 20-40 minutes or so, and I need to see you afterwards. Wait out front for me, I will give you a call right as soon as I am about to pull up.

Chandra dissapears with no ID, and Condit disposes of the phone all in one fell swoop. Something was definately going on that day with her web surfing. She was not only checking on the agriculture committee's website, she also went to a site that tracked the status/progress of legislation.

Wild guess here, but perhaps she found out that Condit lied to her about being busy at times when he was busy with Anne Marie Smith or another girlfriend. Condit says, "No date tonight, I have to stay late at the office to finish work on the Dairy Support Bill. She is about to confront Condit on all she learns about his womanizing, with Jennifer Thomas, etc... and she checks the status of bills he claims he was working on, too busy to meet with her.

I do think we should fax/email/radio talk show bomb all and demand that the media fix the May 1st problem though before anything else. Where are the Woodward and Bernstein's these days?

The media can not find ONE person who went to Condit's office early in the afternoon of May 1st? It would at least make me less suspicious that Condit was physically involved with her abduction if they can nail down his whereabouts that afternoon. Still doesn't make him morally innocent, but still...

Is any reporter even trying, through a FOIA request to get access to Condit's meeting records, phone records for that date. These are calls/meeting logs from his taxpayer funded office. It's not like they want to get his home phone records. Just get a peak at his office schedule. He has to have the equivalent of a secretary, who has a nice shiny appointments calendar. If it exists, can't we see it?

Now, since Mike Dayton was verified to be at the Cheney meeting with Condit, was Dayton with him from 1-3:30PM too? Does any other staffer vouch that Dayton was in the office as well?

Both Dayton and Condit have not explained May 17th yet as well. We keep talking about Luray, Va at midnight, but Condit could have left D.C. at 10PM to get there. Where was Condit, where was Dayton from 10am to 10PM? I am so frustrated with the media for not asking these questions.

The media is about as bumbling as the police department. They could even get a source from the phone company to divulge the phone records for May 1st, and track down folks who called in, #'s placed out, and figure if any of the calls from Condit's office from 1PM-3:30PM were initiated by Condit himself.

Wouldn't it get us so much further to just get past that key period and know if Condit was in his office or not? Any media types reading this? How about investigating this instead of which congress member thinks Condit will resign or not. Let's figure out his alibi first, don't ya think?

23 posted on 09/08/2001 5:47:34 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson