Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condit Retirement Pledge Won't Spare Dems
Newsmax ^ | 09/08/01 | C Limbacher

Posted on 09/08/2001 8:33:02 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

In the coming days, disgraced Congressman Gary Condit is expected to announce that he's ready to retire from the House -- in 2003.

Democratic Party leaders are praying that his promise to depart the scene in the distant bye and bye will tamp down interest in Condit's Chandra Levy cover-up and thereby take the heat off the party.

Nice try.

The embattled congressman's January 2003 retirement means that for the next fifteen months, Washington, D.C.'s most suspicious politician will not only continue to serve in the House of Representatives, it looks like he'll retain his highly sensitive post on the House Intelligence Committee.

That's right. While House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt made some noises last week about bouncing Condit from the intelligence post when Congress returns from its summer recess, the top Democrat seems to be moving slower than molasses.

On Friday, five days into the new session, Gephardt was still consulting with his colleagues over how he should handle their Condit problem, with Party flacks complaining there's no precedent for stripping him of his committee post.

Neither is there any precedent for a congressman continuing in office while stonewalling police and the FBI over the fate of his missing and presumed dead mistress, but that doesn't seem to bother Party faithful too much.

Democratic spinmeisters insist that all the scandal-scarred congressman's secrets are out; and that means he's no longer blackmailable while he remains privy to the nation's most sensitive national security information.

But that notion goes up in smoke if it turns out there's anything to the account of Susan Borges Rossi -- who told the National Enquirer last week that during her own relationship with Condit he told her he had a "fix it" team on his staff to dispose of dead bodies.

(NewsMax.com's efforts to reach Ms. Rossi this week were unsuccessful. That could mean she's doesn't want to subject her account to further media scrutiny. Or that she's talking to the FBI and they've asked her to hold her tongue.)

Then there's the account of former California Congressman Bob Dornan -- a one-time Intelligence Committee member himself who still has well placed sources in the state. He blurted out on Fox News Thursday night that Condit had an affair with a female House colleague and was currently blackmailing other colleagues with their own sex secrets in order to save his political hyde.)

Meanwhile, a Stanislaus County grand jury is expected to announce its decision on whether to indict the politically radioactive Democrat in a day or two.

Gephardt and company better hope they drop the case -- and that there's nothing to either the Rossi or Dornan accounts -- or the Democrats' summertime Condit nightmare will haunt them all the way through the midterm elections next year.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Continue to serve on the Intelligence Committee? Amazing!
1 posted on 09/08/2001 8:33:02 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"....with Party flacks complaining there's no precedent for stripping him of his committee post.

No, just their own House Ethics rules.

2 posted on 09/08/2001 8:41:38 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
REGARDING the female victims: whole thing's gettin to be like the ROBERT BLAKE story-FIZZLIN INTO OBLIVION!!!!!!!

BOTH GUYS are skatin

3 posted on 09/08/2001 8:45:26 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
What violations would be considered sufficient for removal?
4 posted on 09/08/2001 8:47:48 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1234
Which party is showing little interest in the "missing person"? Which party is spinning this as anything other than personal? Which party refuses to consider the past? Which party seems more interested in itself than anything else?
5 posted on 09/08/2001 8:52:35 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What violations would be considered sufficient for removal?

Leading a prayer session in one's office.

6 posted on 09/08/2001 8:52:46 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
ETHICS MANUAL THE CODE OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT House Rule XLIII; #1.
7 posted on 09/08/2001 8:54:56 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The public face of the democRATS...CLINDIT
8 posted on 09/08/2001 9:01:22 AM PDT by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Gee.... the Barbara Boxer's of the world weren't content to simply let Bob Packwood finish out his term, then retire.
9 posted on 09/08/2001 9:08:39 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Bingo...while I'm not a conservative, fundamentalist Christian (I'm a Catholic) I do find the shift in what is considered frightening behavior by the liberal press to be surreal...it's okay to be an arrogant, materialistic shell of a man (Clinton) and it's okay to be a kinky sex addict (Clinton-cigar scenario/ Condit-anal fixation afficionado) but it's not okay to pray to God (Ashcroft) in front of your staff...BTW read an article on this thread yesterday where an Anglican bishop (or archbishop) in England has stated that Christianity is disappearing in that country to be replaced by the psuedo-religions of environmentalism and New Age beliefs in crystals and Wicca-magic type faiths. Now I have never feared the idea of an Apocalypse but I do see the world headed down a one-way street where the only strongly religious nations besides the USA will be Muslim or Hindu in character.
10 posted on 09/08/2001 9:16:45 AM PDT by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson