Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Universe 'Could Condense Into Jelly'
BBC ^ | 9-6-2001 | Helen Briggs

Posted on 09/06/2001 4:07:20 PM PDT by blam

Thursday, 6 September, 2001, 10:39 GMT 11:39 UK

Universe 'could condense into jelly'

By BBC News Online's Helen Briggs
The Universe may be in a state where matter could disintegrate at any moment, a scientist has warned.

But the probability is less than that of buying two lottery tickets in the same week that both win the lottery, said Dr Benjamin Allanach of the European laboratory for particle physics, CERN, in Geneva.

"The fact that the Universe has existed for 15 billion years should tell you it's not likely to happen tomorrow," he told the British Association Festival of Science in Glasgow. "The probability of it happening is tiny."

The idea behind such a catastrophic possibility is supersymmetry. This theory of the Universe states that every particle that makes up matter has a heavier ghostly partner that has similar but not identical properties.

If true, current data implies that the Universe must be perched on an unstable vacuum and "could suddenly condense into jelly and cause this catastrophe", said Dr Allanach.

Ghostly particle

The danger is that a jelly of the ghostly partner of the quark could form spontaneously at any moment, changing the laws of physics of the whole Universe.

Light would stop shining, electricity would no longer work and the matter that makes up us, the Earth and the stars would disintegrate to form a different kind of matter, said Dr Allanach.

This disaster scenario caused some initial nightmares, he said. But further calculations showed that the probability of it actually happening was miniscule, even in a time as long as the age of our Universe.

The actual probability is one in 13 million squared, he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: darkenergy; darkmatter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: staytrue
I suspect you are correct. Sure don't know, though!
41 posted on 09/06/2001 4:36:42 PM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam
You forgot to mention the parallel universe, in which all matter could suddenly condense into peanut butter!
42 posted on 09/06/2001 4:37:15 PM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Has anyone seen Schroedinger's cat...lately?

It tunneled out, then collapsed the
rat's wave form.

43 posted on 09/06/2001 4:37:53 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Has anyone seen Schroedinger's cat...lately?

Honest. I didn't see that black and white tabby as it walked across the street while I stepped on the accelerator. Honest. ;)

44 posted on 09/06/2001 4:39:30 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
After reading, then researching this assumption....The Focault Foundation has it on very good authority that this theory is indeed correct, the reason....42.
45 posted on 09/06/2001 4:42:00 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
I like jelly.

I REALLY REALLY like jelly.

46 posted on 09/06/2001 4:42:02 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sounds good to us!

Signed,

The Smuckers Company

47 posted on 09/06/2001 4:43:02 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Fruit flavored, or K-Y?
48 posted on 09/06/2001 4:43:33 PM PDT by Storm Orphan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Universe is Turning to Jelly! We are Toast, I tell you. Toast!
49 posted on 09/06/2001 4:45:26 PM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Universe 'could condense into jelly'

There's a Hillary joke in here somewhere. Give it up blam!

50 posted on 09/06/2001 4:46:21 PM PDT by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
That certainly puts global warming in perspective.
51 posted on 09/06/2001 4:47:42 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
We may all be figments of "somethings" imagination.
52 posted on 09/06/2001 4:48:44 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The question then becomes: Where will we find an english muffin that's 20 trillion light years in diameter?
53 posted on 09/06/2001 4:55:08 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Dang it, I was hoping for cruchy peanutbutter.

No prob. It comes in two varieties.


54 posted on 09/06/2001 4:59:37 PM PDT by KillerWabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well, since we are all going to die anyhow, this is probably not a bad way to go. Death would be painless and instantaneous. It would be over before we even knew anything was happening. One minute you would be sitting at your computer, a split-second later, you woul
55 posted on 09/06/2001 5:01:24 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
The question then becomes: Where will we find an english muffin that's 20 trillion light years in diameter?

I posit to you......where will the mouths come from to eat them? This sounds like a problem for my Foundation researchers...We will respond with an appropriate answer in due course.

56 posted on 09/06/2001 5:03:09 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
> I think it is two to the thirteen millionth power.

Rather a large number, this. But, wth, I'll take a couple of lottery tickets.

57 posted on 09/06/2001 5:03:21 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam
We must have a massive government program to prevent this. Its for the children.
58 posted on 09/06/2001 5:03:28 PM PDT by sendtoscott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I always pictured jam, not jelly...

Break out the toast!

59 posted on 09/06/2001 5:04:59 PM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuor
This possibility is much higher than that of the Universe having the properties it currently has, and *that* possibility is much higher than that of intelligent life arising anywhere in the Universe.

I've heard similar analogies before. They strike me as unimaginative. On Earth, life is obviously abundant. How many atoms make up Earth? If we were to shrink the Universe to the size of the Earth, our search for life in the Earth-sized Universe is the equivalent of searching one atom. I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but you get the idea. How about something much larger than an atom, say, for example, a grain of sand. How many grains of sand would have to be searched before stumbling upon life?

60 posted on 09/06/2001 5:05:43 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson