Yep. Ole Doughty, a major Buchanan supporter, stands as an objective observer.
On a thread, last week, DO referred to Bush as an "MF."
He's a real objective observer, as are you.
But, unlike you, DoughtyOne stands at a distance, as an individual and keen observer, and is not so closely following the Bush Administration's every
move(ment) that both his eyes, nose and ears are rendered essentially useless.
Yep. Ole Doughty, a major Buchanan supporter, stands as an objective observer.
On a thread, last week, DO referred to Bush as an "MF."
He's a real objective observer, as are you.
182 Posted on 09/05/2001 20:12:48 PDT by sinkspur
Let me see, which candidate said we have a problem with immigration, the decline of our military and kissing China's procelin arse? Imagine, I voted for a guy like that. And you seem to think reminding people of it strengthens your position. Frankly after watching Bush melt on these issues, I wouldn't want to remind anyone that there was a candidate that stood diametricly opposed to Bush/Gore.
Well ole Sink, if it was in the context of cutting the military further, I can assure you I called him a lot worse off the forum.
How about providing a link to that comment. I'd like to see what my motivation was.
There is not one ounce of venom spewed by me that cannot be backed up by facts.
Plus, I always admit when I'm wrong.
(Unlike you and the other illiterate Texans who thought SB-30 "required" parental consent).
Perhaps one day when you produce your CV for us, we'll better understand why on earth you seem to think your Personal Opinions, likes and dislikes should matter to those of us who do our homework and forego the Bush nose-ring by which we can be led down the twists and turns of his decisions re: embryonic stem cell funding, Faith-based government partnerships, "normalized" illegal aliens, seamless borders, NATO excesses and this bit of executive privilege tailored to cover his compadre Clinton's behind.