Posted on 10/25/2026 2:30:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
A 12-year legal campaign resulted in Norway’s seizing a Russian research vessel in Svalbard, deep into the Arctic Circle
SVALBARD, Norway—This summer, Russia’s Geographical Society leased an ice-strengthened vessel for an expedition to map Russia’s historic presence on Norway’s Arctic archipelago of Svalbard.
The sun shone and the waters were calm, the passengers on the Professor Molchanov recalled. What they didn’t know was that Norwegian police would board it at its first stop, the Russian-run mining town of Barentsburg, with a court order to seize the ship and its paperwork.
The Russians were in no mood to cooperate.
The episode last month in the High North, just 800 miles from the North Pole, was the latest in a globe-spanning effort to pursue Russian assets that accelerated after Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Superyachts and private jets of sanctioned Russian oligarchs have been impounded, commercial vessels have been seized, and $300 billion of Russian central-bank assets have been frozen by the European Union.
The Professor Molchanov, named for a famed Russian scientist, had become a target, too—this time to punish Moscow for one of the first shots in the continuing conflict: its annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Ukraine’s state energy giant NJSC Naftogaz took legal action to secure compensation from Russia’s Gazprom for energy assets it took over when Russia seized the crucial peninsula on the Black Sea.
Working with the U.S. law firm Covington & Burling LLP, Naftogaz battled in the courts for nearly a decade with no result. Russia dismissed the case as bogus.
It wasn’t until April 2023 that an international arbitration tribunal in The Hague ruled that Gazprom had unlawfully expropriated Naftogaz’s Crimean assets. It set compensation at $4.2 billion plus interest, which at the time of the award pushed the total...
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The EU wants Russia’s stuff. That’s why they kept poking the bear, so they could say Russia started it.
And Putin wants to put the Russian Empire back together.
It is why he invaded Georgia and Moldova, and invaded and annexed the Crimea.
They have been part of the Russian Empire, historically.
I have some sympathy for Russia, but a good chunk of the Ukrainian war’s provenance stands with President Putin.
So?
More of its provenance stands with Victoria Nuland's 2014 CIA color revolution.
Russia might nationalize the drug patents of nationals of hostile countries.
Low-cost drugs could be made Indian and Chinese experts and offered for sale in the Russian Federation and overseas Russian naval bases.
“The episode last month in the High North, just 800 miles from the North Pole, was the latest in a globe-spanning effort to pursue Russian assets that accelerated after Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago.”
This happened a month ago. Denmark, all of a sudden, cedes to Trump’s request to occupy Greenland after resisting it for the past year and a half. Strange coincidences happen when Trump is right and the Nordics panic.
The architecture of the conflict -- and all conflicts across history -- ultimately comes down to "you have it and we want it."
The window dressing -- many forms and costumes and slogans -- might seem to change the appearance of things, but it comes down to that.
And so "an international arbitration tribunal in The Hague ruled" with the hope that this would put an end to things. It won't.
That applies equally to Ukraine: Ukrainians have it, Russia wants it.
Yup. It does.
It also applies to every other nation, group, alliance, consortium and --- pick a noun -- in this world.
Specifically, in this small part of human history, Naftogaz is a "state-owned company subordinated to the Government of Ukraine...." [ Wiki ]
Given that socialism ( and of course Communism as the end game ) is defined by state ownership, while fascism is defined by "state control," and freedom is a totally alien concept to both "isms," what seems correct to say is that an "ism" is behind "state ownership" and that "pursuit of assets."
"That applies equally...." Yes, sir, it does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.