Posted on 10/02/2026 11:31:19 AM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
The old joke that “whoever said marriage is a 50-50 proposition didn’t know the half of it,” takes on a whole new meaning in a culture flirting with “polyamory.”...
Most important in the drive to normalize polyamory is the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision. By legalizing same-sex “marriage” nationwide, the male/female distinction was treated as irrelevant for marriage, which opened the door to additional relational arrangements. In his dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts even questioned whether the arguments for same-sex marriage would justify “people who find fulfillment in polyamorous relationships.” The answer is unfortunately “yes.”
(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
This my be what's next, but pedophilia is still the goal.
I tried to tell our liberal “gay” marriage freepers this, that they were supporting what amounted to “whatever consenting adults want to call marriage”, and that the Muslims would want theirs and eventually the Mormons will have another revelation, and Katy bar the door, here it all comes because “marriage” is no more, will be the result.
Stevie Wonder could have seen it coming.
They have to keep pushing the envelope.
This needs that old political cartoon of the newly-married gay couple throwing the bouquet to anxiously awaiting perverts.
The Social Justice wing of the PCUSA argued that polygamy was legitimate
Wasn't that the car finish coating that was supposed to protect the body from rust?
Guess not.
"Polyglycoat is a vintage solvent-based polymer paint sealant from the 1960s–1980s, designed to protect automotive paint but considered difficult to apply and largely obsolete today." Claimed to protect paint from weather, UV, and road salt as well fading from Sun exposure.
Sick.
I would rather allow polyamory than this charade that a man with a man can be a marriage, or that a man is a woman because he says he is.
Polygamy is not God’s Plan, but it is not a sin against Nature the way the other things are.
1st Corinthians 7:1-3 -- Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.
The New Testament calls for heterosexual monogamy.
It’s really shocking to me how many leftists inhabit the comments section of the Christian Post. Every time I visit, they seem to be the overwhelming group.
Whoever did not see this coming, please pick up your application for guide dog request at the main desk.
Said that this would be next 15 years ago
The KJV has its own way with the translation -- "Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband."
My wife pointed out years ago that the LGBT and later LGBT+ stuff could be replaced by a single letter -- P.
P R O M I S C U I T Y
Homosexuals, even the "bi" who by definfion practice some sort of homosexuality at times, and certainly the T crowds and associated types all come under that simple single word.
P R O M I S C U I T Y
The opposite of promiscuity is " heterosexual monogamy."
The promiscuous of all sorts and types hate the notion of " heterosexual monogamy." Because they are promiscuous, and practice promiscuity.
We were all told that this was made up, that we were just homophobic to even bring it up and now here we are.
The envelope was not merely pushed, a large slit was torn in the side and concept has escaped from the envelope altogether.
Wish and hope sometimes conceive of a total fantasy, irreconcilable with any logic or reasonable dialogue.
The denial of male-female bond in creating a family has been tried many times in history, and it inevitably fails. Not only fails, but takes down quite a bit of the rest of the mutual contract on which society relies to maintain order.
I think “The Pill” was the main spark of the descent.
What most people in this discussion completely miss is that what was described in the Old Testament is nothing like what is pushed today.
Ancient marriages often involve multiple wives of one man, but they were SEPARATE MARRIAGES. Better described as concurrent marriages. Each wife had NO relationship with the other wives, only to the man.
Modern arrangements, and the suggested change, is for each member of the multiple marriage to be in a legal relationship with each other, not a central controlling head.
Give them every opportunity to show you who they truly are.
Forcing them to hold back, to follow a script, increases the level and numbers of mentally ill in future generations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.