Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ Says Post Office Carry Ban Contradicts Federal Law
Bearing Arms ^ | 8/13/2026 | Cam Edwards

Posted on 08/13/2026 10:59:13 AM PDT by VanShuyten

The federal government's ban on carrying firearms in U.S. post offices may soon be over, now that the Dept. of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel has issued an advisory opinion stating the ban does not comply with federal law.

… The OLC opinion argues that in order to legally carry, both the entry into the federal facility and the carrying of the firearm must be for a lawful purpose.

… Carrying arms for self-defense when entering a building held open to the public is a paradigmatic lawful purpose. The Supreme Court recognized as much in District of Columbia v. Heller, when it unequivocally statedֻ thatֻ “theֻ inherentֻ rightֻ ofֻ self-defense”ֻ isֻ “centralֻ toֻ theֻ Secondֻ Amendmentֻ right.”

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: concealedcarry; doj; usps

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

I hope that soon I will no longer be breaking federal law when I pay my property taxes via the postal service.
1 posted on 08/13/2026 10:59:13 AM PDT by VanShuyten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
The post office can't even guarantee the safety of mail dropped in the blue boxes outside the post office. Mongrels have rigs to collect mail dropped in and then later retrieved and stolen.

After Pat Sherril in Edmond, they derned sure can't guarantee my safety inside the PO, either.

2 posted on 08/13/2026 11:02:26 AM PDT by LouAvul (They're doing it again because you didn't hang them last time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Keep in mind that we’re technically “breaking the law” just by having a firearm in our car when we enter the PO’s parking lot.


3 posted on 08/13/2026 11:12:47 AM PDT by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Going to the post office is required in many areas that don’t deliver to the houses, and people incorporate that into their walks, their bicycling, and some people ride motorcycles, yet they can’t carry their gun while doing the walking and bicycling, and who wants to remove their pistol in plain sight and leave it with their motorcycle.


4 posted on 08/13/2026 11:20:25 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
' The Supreme Court recognized as much in District of Columbia v. Heller, when it unequivocally statedֻ thatֻ “theֻ inherentֻ rightֻ ofֻ self-defense”ֻ isֻ “centralֻ toֻ theֻ Secondֻ Amendmentֻ right.”'

Good luck on that, scotus reaaffirmed the ban of weapons on gov't property and other restrictions.

"The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."

5 posted on 08/13/2026 11:30:55 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

The OLC is exactly right. The statute allows carry for lawful purposes.

It’s the USPS regulation that forbids carry.


6 posted on 08/13/2026 11:32:57 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Oh yeah. The notion of USPS employees and firearms conjures fiery memories.


7 posted on 08/13/2026 11:37:04 AM PDT by DPMD (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
entering a building held open to the public is a paradigmatic lawful purpose...

Since a mail-in ballot is a disenfranchising paradigm, the DOJ/OLC hereby states that it is forevermore unlawful to carry a mail-in ballot into any USPS postal service office, and/or placing a mail-in ballot into any USPS receptacle. Punishable by law.

After all, it can't be legal to place a loaded gun into a post office box, neither should it be legal to place a loaded mail-in ballot inside one.

8 posted on 08/13/2026 11:37:21 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
I remember back in the 80's when "going postal" was a thing.


9 posted on 08/13/2026 11:46:57 AM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

What part of “going postal” don’t they understand?


10 posted on 08/13/2026 11:49:28 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Quiet! Quiet Piggy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
What part of “going postal” don’t they understand?

Those Post Office shooters were employees, not customers.

And the Post Office 100% had blood on their hands for those Post Office shootings. It was difficult to fire a Postal employee so they'd instead make their lives hell until they quit, but some snapped and shot up the workplace.

Hostile Workplace laws came about because of the hostile workplace the Post Office created.

11 posted on 08/13/2026 12:06:45 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

Stupid laws merit disobedience. I oblige regularly.

The problem is when stupid meets stupid law = incarceration.

Don’t be stupid.


12 posted on 08/13/2026 1:27:43 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 "/!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

unless carying a firearm is part of your official duties .... Carrying on Fed Property is illegal.


13 posted on 08/13/2026 1:41:32 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
"..we’re technically “breaking the law” just by having a firearm in our car when we enter the PO’s parking lot.."

That represents a dilemma since private citizens are allowed to mail shotguns and rifles to an FFL.

14 posted on 08/13/2026 1:49:37 PM PDT by LouAvul (They're doing it again because you didn't hang them last time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Keep in mind that we’re technically “breaking the law” just by having a firearm in our car when we enter the PO’s parking lot.

Breaking the law by engaging in your constitutional rights. Absolutely crazy.

15 posted on 08/13/2026 2:46:33 PM PDT by thegagline (If you hate Christianity, Vote Talarico. Sic semper tyrannis! Zeldin for President )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

Those Post Office shooters were employees, not customers.

***********************************

Post Office on Sunset Road, Las Vegas Nevada.
Guy got fired, went home, got his firearm, went back in and killed his boss.

Some years ago. Post office was named after the boss.


16 posted on 08/13/2026 2:48:05 PM PDT by dagunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

This has always been a stupid law. It was a knee jerk law passed in the aftermath of a USPS employee going on a killng spree. Where do you think the term “going postal” came from?


17 posted on 08/13/2026 3:42:43 PM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson