Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US mulls plan to snatch enriched uranium from Iran’s nuclear facilities: ‘most sophisticated op in history’
NY Post - California Post ^ | July 25th, 2026 | By Caitlin Doornbos and Shane Galvin

Posted on 07/25/2026 10:37:01 AM PDT by Mariner

It’s the nuclear option.

American Special Operations forces are waiting in the wings to launch the “most sophisticated operation in military history” to seize Iran’s enriched uranium from heavily fortified nuclear sites.

“I hate to say it, but I think the most likely way to get rid of Iran’s nuclear material, at least what they currently have, is a military operation because the negotiations aren’t going anywhere fast,” said Joseph Rodgers, deputy director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The deeply complex operation would involve thousands of ground troops storming Iran’s nuclear facilities — navigating boobytraps, utilizing construction crews, and maintaining a large defensive blocking force surrounding the sites — a source familiar with military planning told The Post on Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
I'm surprised the Post published this.

Is it misinformation? Psychological Warfare?

Or will they try to do this?

1 posted on 07/25/2026 10:37:01 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If they haven’t it done already, if the Iranians have any brains they will booby-trap all their heavy equipment on site.


2 posted on 07/25/2026 10:40:31 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It’s good that we are broadcasting our super top secret plans to the enemy.


3 posted on 07/25/2026 10:40:36 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I would think a “low yield” nuke would take care of the problem, and dissuade the regime from trying to salvage what-ever remains.


4 posted on 07/25/2026 10:42:23 AM PDT by Segovia (https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2025/07/06/fossil-fooled-lives-vs-lies-n2659950)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
a source familiar with military planning told The Post on Friday

Should be tried for treason.

5 posted on 07/25/2026 10:42:43 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Does this mean that we are trying to stir movement to either find where it is, or to get some clues of what defenses would be moving to protect it?


6 posted on 07/25/2026 10:47:19 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Should be tried for treason.

- - - - - - -

I doubt the Iranians didn’t consider such obvious possibility.


7 posted on 07/25/2026 10:48:06 AM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner


"Uranium, see 'Snatch'."
8 posted on 07/25/2026 10:48:24 AM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

> If they haven’t it done already, if the Iranians have any brains they will booby-trap all their heavy equipment on site. <

And just bury the uranium. Sure, they (or US special forces) could get to it. But that would take a lot of digging. And for the US special forces, also a lot of casualties.

I’m hoping this story is just more misdirection.


9 posted on 07/25/2026 10:48:28 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

My thought too. the things people will do for a quick story and a buck.


10 posted on 07/25/2026 10:49:45 AM PDT by b4me (Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“Should be tried for treason. “

It could be diversionary disinformation.

Otherwise, I agree.


11 posted on 07/25/2026 10:50:16 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I also tend to believe this is part of an intel op.

It doesn’t mean they won’t do it, but there’s probably a reason for us reading about it now.


12 posted on 07/25/2026 10:51:28 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Wesel, Germany, 1945:

13 posted on 07/25/2026 10:52:57 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (The data centers might be hunting down guns. Black tape device cameras and PC microphones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Can't be real. We were already told its destroyed, dust or incapable of being salvaged.

History doesn't repeat, but rhymes. Another failed Operation Eagle Claw would be disastrous. Interesting of note, the Sec of State at the time was named Vance.

14 posted on 07/25/2026 10:54:43 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

How about NO! And stop telling plans to the enemy!


15 posted on 07/25/2026 11:04:13 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

We need more details on specific plans so we can prepare. 🙄


16 posted on 07/25/2026 11:04:34 AM PDT by rktman (Patriotism not 'hateriotism' !. Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
My expectation from the beginning has been that we have no choice but to propel Iran into revolution, but I don't see much evidence that the military gets it. They're too busy protecting ships in the Strait, and to my mind they have neglected their "blockade" on land.

It's a big country, and to cut off resupply from Pakistan or Russia entails a long flight. Losing the use of those bases in Saudi Arabia (for example) inhibits refueling B-52s for that bombing run. Don't know what the plan is there.

17 posted on 07/25/2026 11:14:20 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The U.S. has been mulling taking the uranium since forever.

And the Iranians have been mulling it too.

Nothing has changed in the last few days; nothing that we know for sure.

Just more mulling; more pondering.

Hopefully, articles like this will force the Iranian military to spread out and prepare to defend every square foot of their big country 24/7; they can never sleep a wink because the Big Devil can attack anywhere at any time and everwhere at once.


18 posted on 07/25/2026 11:14:31 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“US mulls plan to snatch enriched uranium from Iran’s nuclear facilities: ‘most sophisticated op in history’”. Why are you going to announce that? Dry gulch ‘em.


19 posted on 07/25/2026 11:14:39 AM PDT by kawhill (Dywedwch wrthym because + Add translation Welsh-English dictionary 'Tell Us')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Who thinks up this crap?


20 posted on 07/25/2026 11:15:26 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Opinions and belly buttons, everybody has one and they get to show them if they want to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson