Posted on 07/17/2026 7:15:40 AM PDT by Twotone
A tiny village is taking a stand against its own government as it faces the threat of being overrun by migrants.
The couple hundred residents of Piddington, Oxfordshire, in the United Kingdom, voted July 4 for independence against the United Kingdom in a bid against authorities who are seeking to flood the area with illegal male migrants. The vote to separate passed in an overwhelming 96 percent majority.
At the heart of the problem for Piddington is the Home Office’s (the UK equivalent of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security) June 26 decision to relocate almost 4,000 migrants to three rural former military bases. One of those bases — the Ministry of Defense Bicester — sits directly next to Piddington and has a fence that runs alongside many locals’ homes, one resident told GB News. The site also borders a playground for children and families created by the parish council.
An estimated 1,250 single adult male asylum seekers aged 18 to 65 are expected to be relocated to the Bicester base next to Piddington. This is over four times the population of the entire village.
The relocation of migrants is part of the British Labour Party’s efforts to end the temporary housing of illegals in hotels as they await case processing. The hotel system has sparked huge controversy and has cost British taxpayers billions of pounds, while contributing to housing shortages.
The Home Office plans to use the Bicester camp for a minimum of 10 years, according to a government fact sheet. The government says it will appoint a “specialist provider of asylum accommodation” to manage the camp and will provide 24/7 on-site security through “a provider of security services” and “CCTV monitoring and recording.”
Locals have expressed fear, however, that the sudden and overwhelming flood of single male migrants into the area will make the village unsafe for women and children.
Piddington resident Tim McNally, who chairs the village’s Parish Council, said his neighbors are distraught.
“[The camp] will just turn the village into a ghost town. It’ll just destroy the spirit of the village, and that’s how people feel absolutely trapped, stressed, concerned,” McNally told the Daily Caller.
“I’ve had men — grown men — crying to me because they’ve got young daughters of an age that for the next 10 years they’ll be young ladies,” McNally added. “One guy who’s got an 18-year-old said, ‘I will not let her go out. I will not let her leave the house alone.’”
Piddington — a village of just 150 homes — has no police force of its own. “We have no crime in this area,” McNally said. “There’s no police. There’s no need. The community is very tight. It’s very well connected.”
“There’s a lot of young people coming into the village, young families evolving, growing here now,” McNally added. “And they are absolutely beside themselves to determine what on earth to do.”
“We don’t have anything to defend ourselves with,” McNally said, “It’s against the law for us to carry a knife or have a gun.”
The government information page on the project reports that asylum seekers will undergo “mandatory security checks” before they reach the camp by “linking their biometric data to immigration, security, and criminality databases.”
But, as McNally observed, foreign criminal databases are not readily accessible, much less after Britain’s exit from the European Union in 2020. “They don’t have access to anything.”
“Only 10 days or 15 days before [the announcement],” McNally added, “I was listening in to BBC Radio Four. And they were interviewing […] the Home Office — these are the people who basically are responsible for managing these asylum seekers — and they were asking, how do they age-verify the people coming in? And [the Home Office] admitted they have no means to verify the age of any of these people.”
“They have no documentation,” McNally told the Caller. “There’s no database they can utilize. There is nothing they can do to verify who these people are by age.”
“If you can’t verify by age, what database can you review to link anyone together anyway? You can’t,” McNally said. “[The Home Office is] using the words to try and make [the camp] sound less risky than it is.”
But the migrant camp poses more threats to Piddington than just safety. McNally —who lives just a 10-minute walk from the base’s front gate — told the Caller it will take a serious toll on the financial stability of his neighbors.
“The values of their houses are virtually just dumped,” McNally said. “Even if they wanted to leave, some of them would have to pay money back to the bank to get out of the village, because no one is going to want to own their property in this village with 1,250 men having the freedom to run around as they wish.”
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Then this gesture would have real teeth to it.
Sounds like a job for about 40 gallons of kerosine, several pints of ale, and a couple of cigars.
And no responding to fire alarms because the wires were cut.
The Vikings were nothing compared to these invaders
Let’s raise a toast to the city of Piddington, Oxfordshire.
aka The Honey Badgers of England.
To quote Bob Marley:
Get up, stand up. Stand up for your rights.
Don’t give up the fight!
The Fire dept that lives there probably don’t want to respond anyway. Get them to help start the fires, so they do it right :-)
Alas, plucky villages only win in the movies. In real life, they get crushed by the government. Especially, as prior posters said, when they have given up their right to defend themselves. Trading freedom for security is simply trading freedom for totalitarianism.
These poor people are trapped. Mass insurrection is the only solution. Tough to do with only sticks and protest signs. A disarmed people is an imprisoned people.
The ale and cigars for the after-party?
Did they really think their vote would matter?
The UK government will crush them, move in the migrants - probably more than stated - destroy this peaceful village - and prosecute anyone who objects with charges of “Hate Crimes” and “Inciting Racial Violence” - while violent muslims are released in their midst, with full support of the government.
The government and two-tiered justice system are the worst enemies of the people. Maybe Trump should let them in as beleaguered refugees.
The Irish are already burning down Migrant housing and the equipment used to build them before they are occupied.
That’s the way to go.
One way to end an invasion of illegals is pretty permanent, and just requires small amounts of lead.
This is just infuriating. They are bound and determined to place “migrants” in every corner of every white country on earth.

Send ‘em some muskets.
I find Brit news really confounding.
Maybe we should drop some there like we should in Iran.
Most compelling line in the whole article:
“We don’t have anything to defend ourselves with,” McNally said, “It’s against the law for us to carry a knife or have a gun.”
Thank God for the 2d Amendment.
I have family in the highlands. The “home office” (should be called the ministry of moving Islamic rapists in to your village) is moving as many filthy turds in to all the villages in the country villages. Apparently it just isn’t good that native Scots live in all white Christian Scottish villages. The diversity needs to be shared. The government is renting every B&B and hotel and sticking the filthy sub humans every where. They are even sticking them in the Hebrides and Shetland islands. There will be no escaping the invasion.
I lived it in Germany when Merkel invited the filth. She stick the African turds and Islamic filth in the villages I lived in. It went from bucolic clean friendly villages to graffiti s hole filled with Islamic criminals in weeks. Any complaints would get the locals arrested. Same in the UK.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.