Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Newsom steered millions to favorite charities, including those tied to ‘first partner’/wife
East Bay Times (California) ^ | 06/18/2026 | Teri Sforza

Posted on 06/19/2026 8:59:06 AM PDT by DFG

California’s powers-that-be have steered more than a half-billion dollars of other people’s money to their favorite charities and causes since 2011, and way more than half of that haul came at the behest of Gov. Gavin Newsom.

That includes millions donated to nonprofits tied to Newsom’s wife, which may have something to do with the federal investigation into Newsom and first partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom.

These donations often come from businesses and people hoping to influence elected leaders, steer public policy, demonstrate their stellar citizenship to the masses, or perhaps a bit of all three. While state law sets caps on gifts and campaign contributions to politicians, there’s no limit on these so-called “behested payments” to politicians’ pet projects.

Critics say it’s another way for the well-heeled to curry official favor, while lawmakers say they’re simply using the power of their bully pulpits to make the world a better place. Consider:

• Total charitable contributions made at the request of all California lawmakers totaled $555.9 million over the past 15 years, according to data from the Fair Political Practices Commission.

• Total charitable contributions made at Newsom’s request totaled $347.2 million. That’s more than 62% of all behests over the time period.

• About $4.3 million of the Newsom behests went to his wife’s California Partners Project, just one of several nonprofits she’s involved with.

It’s not a good look.

“There’s no question that Newsom has used this privilege far more frequently than other elected officials,” said political strategist and academic Dan Schnur. “As long as he files the required disclosure forms and there is no evidence of an explicit quid pro quo, he is entirely within the law. But many people believe that an official should not be able to make requests such as these on behalf of organizations in which their own family members are involved.”

Sean McMorris, Transparency, Ethics and Accountability program manager for California Common Cause, a nonpartisan good-government watchdog, agrees.

“Behests often go to good causes, but they are ripe for abuse,” he said. “Politicians in positions of power can direct money in a way that they otherwise would not be allowed to do under campaign finance or conflict-of-interest laws. They really exploded during the pandemic and afterward, a lot of politicians realized, ‘This is a kind of an avenue I can use.’”

Which is not to say that all politicians use behests with ill or nefarious intent. A lot of this money does indeed go to good causes — Newsom’s list includes groups working on wildfire recovery, public health initiatives, housing, education and much more.

“The problem is,” McMorris said, “it’s connected to politics.

“That’s where this perception of pay-to-play becomes prevalent. The public is not stupid. There’s a reason why these politicians primarily reach out only to people, entities and special interests who typically have interests before them or need votes from them.”

Things get even stickier when the politician asks for donations to an organization where that politician, or an immediate family member, hold a position of power or receives an income. A loophole in campaign finance and conflict-of-interest laws, he said.

Clearly, there’s a game being played here. There doesn’t have to be an explicit quid pro quo. Those who want to stay in the good graces of the powerful view behests as a great opportunity to gain favor and influence.

“And it’s legal,” McMorris said. “They don’t have to try and defend themselves. A lot of the justification is, ‘The ends justify the means,’ because the money is usually going to a good cause. But the means do matter. If the ends have to justify the means, then the means are probably questionable.”

In San Francisco, voters passed a law that didn’t forbid behests outright — it simply prohibited behests from people or entities with business before the city. And politicians promptly sought to gut it, seeking “waivers” allowing them to extract donations from exactly those people or entities with businesses before the city.

Which tells you just about everything you need to know about behests. It’s not just about the good and the righteous. It’s about power.

In related news, Newsom has had some run-ins with the FPPC over late filing of behested payments, and is facing a $31,500 fine. We asked the governor’s office for its take on all this, but didn’t hear back by deadline. We’ll let you know if/when we do.


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: charity; gavinnewsom; jennifernewsom; nonprofits

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2026 8:59:06 AM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG
It’s not a good look.

They are Democrats. Who cares? (/lieberals)

2 posted on 06/19/2026 9:11:52 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt (Fascist, deplorable, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Isn’t that every politicians first duty? Take care of friends and family.

After all, the word “nepotism” comes from the Italian nepote/nipote which means nephew or grandson.


3 posted on 06/19/2026 9:15:00 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
...first partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom.
Spouses

Kimberly Guilfoyle
​ ​(m. 2001; div. 2006)​

Jennifer Siebel ​(m. 2008)

Leftist doublethink is insane.
4 posted on 06/19/2026 9:22:17 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

So deeply, utterly, totally corrupt!


5 posted on 06/19/2026 9:39:41 AM PDT by rejoicing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

LET US ALL KNOW WHEN THE CALIF LOTTERY GETS A DEEEEEP AUDIT.

OVER 40 YEARS-—WHERE DID ALL THE $$$$$$$$$$$$$ GO?


6 posted on 06/19/2026 9:44:11 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
The only reason these stores about Governor Hairgel are suddenly appearing is because of his race and gender.p>Democrats will no longer accept a White man as a candidate of any significance.

This is exactly what they did to Swalwell.

7 posted on 06/19/2026 9:49:58 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (Political insight on loan from Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rejoicing

Looks really corrupt—I bet most of the cash is going into a few deep pockets. Trump should take away the state charter and occupy California—appointing a governor-General to rule before Free Elections can be held and closely supervised by agents of the Federal Government. Who should be appointed?
Spencer Pratt?


8 posted on 06/19/2026 9:50:34 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (. War is Hell, War IS a Crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The level of fraud in California is astronomical. Even Fareed Zakaria on his CNN show took a shot at the poor governance of California. If CNN is allowing one of their hosts to criticize a blue state and how it’s being governed badly, knowing their Democrat bias, I think a growing number of Democrat insiders are having second thoughts about Newsom. A year ago I would have put money on him being the Democrat nominee for president in 2028. Not so sure now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48utP9jt5ig&t=14s


9 posted on 06/19/2026 9:58:45 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

The citizens of California did NOT elect these corrupt bastards and bitches, VOTER FRAUD elected them for decades. Those condemning everyone in California for this should look at yourselves during the 2020 voter-fraud infested election. Did you vote for FU Biden? No, what happened then? Voter fraud elected FU Biden; same shit goes on in Blue states and even in RED states. There were nonstop DJT rallies and parades in CA in 2020 and 2024 for DJT. DJT said CA is Red and he has the proof.

San Diego Boat Parade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A1vLuQ8tJs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDNHhAxrJmI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppyd05kiXJk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4o3xsHm7r4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeqWkVPQ95w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie9eky4Nb1c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vOBWaNMsAs&t=5s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKCUxzGRsU8

Sacramento, CA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlDl99M480o

Riverside CA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpeG6N68_2U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-YrbmlPLP4

WORLD RECORD TRUMP 2020 MOTORCADE - CALIFORNIA
FROM SAN CLEMENTE TO SAN DIEGO, THE MOTORCADE OF OVER 1,500 MOTORCYLES, TRUCKS, AND CARS STRETCHED AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE IN SUPPORT OF THE PRESIDENT. LANDSLIDE WIN ....YEAHHHH TRUMP 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-YrbmlPLP4

DJT Boat Parade 2024

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9QN9P8uKfV0

Donald Trump California June 9 2024

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ek0TGQNN7Iw

Trump car parade Oct 24th 2020 Orange County California

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4o3xsHm7r4

Trump Car Parade 2024 Oakdale CA.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MgJ2PgEhj7M

Over 2,000 boats expected at second Trump Boat Parade on the San Diego Bay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkbznDCuueQ

Boat parade and ‘Trump train’ go through San Diego voicing support for Pres. Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rH6fRLVgU8

Trump Rally Car Parade | RIVERSIDE-TEMECULA, CA 11.1.20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vOBWaNMsAs&t=21s

Massive Trump Train on highway 101 California #trump #california #rally

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IoutU44bpJg


10 posted on 06/19/2026 10:20:28 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The FireAid money ALL went into Dem NGO’s and into NewSCUM’s pocket..NOT ONE CENT went to fire victims..and then you have his “wife” who he cheats on non stop with his interns, EVERYONE KNOWS THAT, her non profits were a total scam, money laundering, embezzlement, it all went into HER pocket..the diaper scam, ALL OF IT..that is why Gavin is on TV freaking out about it, he knows he is going to prison along with his “wife”


11 posted on 06/19/2026 10:20:29 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Democrats have always been their favorite charity.


12 posted on 06/19/2026 10:38:57 AM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Future co-president


13 posted on 06/19/2026 10:40:50 AM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet
I think a growing number of Democrat insiders are having second thoughts about Newsom. A year ago I would have put money on him being the Democrat nominee for president in 2028.

If I have to bet $$$ right now, I'll have to say they'll run Wes Moore in 2028.

14 posted on 06/19/2026 10:41:06 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DFG

“First Partner”?
Make that “First Gestating Person.”

Of course, in a business sense, labeling her a partner brings her into his corruption sphere.


15 posted on 06/19/2026 10:52:20 AM PDT by DPMD (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

He must believe he’s the favorite charities?.

One way or another?.


16 posted on 06/19/2026 11:56:40 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Everyone knows you launder the bribes through the spouse. Pelosi was the queen of the husband laundry.


17 posted on 06/19/2026 12:37:27 PM PDT by bray (Thank God for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

He would be a dangerous candidate for us to face in 2028. He’s a veteran, and while he is liberal like every other Democrat is, he does a good job of hiding it and the media likes to portray him as a moderate. Plus, he’s black and doesn’t have a scent of scandal on him like the overwhelming stench Newsom has.

I think I mentioned Moore’s name in a post here last year as a possible candidate. Well, the media is certainly speculating now about him being a candidate. He would be a formidable candidate. He is one to keep an eye on as I believe Newsom’s presidential chances are about to implode.


18 posted on 06/19/2026 1:32:52 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet
He would be a dangerous candidate for us to face in 2028. He’s a veteran, and while he is liberal like every other Democrat is, he does a good job of hiding it and the media likes to portray him as a moderate. Plus, he’s black and doesn’t have a scent of scandal on him like the overwhelming stench Newsom has.

He's the opposite of Newsom and he's more like Obama. A family man. Married with two children just like Obama.

If he has skeletons in his closet, we would know by now.

He's a boring guy which is perfect. I wouldn't be surprised to see Gretchen Whitmer on his ticket.

Moore is not flashy but Jimmy Carter won in 1976 with similar strategy.

19 posted on 06/19/2026 1:43:43 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican; All

His military resume seems to have some serious exaggerations on it.


20 posted on 06/19/2026 1:46:24 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson