U.S. Attorney Is Out to Expose California Fraud and Secure Sketchy Elections

PJ Media ^ | 06/05/2026 | Catherine Salgado

[SeekAndFind]

A hardcore warrior against all criminal fraud in California is on the case to discover exactly what Democrats are doing in controversial primary elections that first trended in Republicans’ favor, but after days of “counting” are now phasing Republicans out.

Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, confirmed on Friday that there is evidence of election fraud in California, and he is certainly investigating the ongoing primary counts for governor, Los Angeles mayor, and other key state and city positions.

Yes. There is evidence of election fraud in California. Here’s a case we charged just last month. More investigations are underway. https://t.co/sdvTPuTpXk— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) June 5, 2026

Essayli highlighted a recent case of voter fraud in California, where Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong pleaded guilty to spending decades bribing homeless people to register to vote and often used her address so she could receive their ballots. But Essayli also addressed the election uppermost in so many people’s minds, the one California Democrats are trying to drag out until they find enough ballots to squeeze Republicans out of runoffs.

Related: Trump Says U.S. Attorney Looking Into ‘Dumocrats’ Stealing California Elections

On June 5, Essayli posted more at length about his efforts. “Protecting the integrity of California’s elections is a top priority for my office,” he stated. “California’s election system has serious structural vulnerabilities. Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”

He cautiously continued, “Without commenting on any specific investigation, my office has multiple election fraud investigations underway in coordination with @FBILosAngeles. We will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations...

---

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; voterfraud

[SeekAndFind]

[SeekAndFind]

[pas]

This is why they do not want ID to vote and do not want to get rid of mailing ballots to everyone.

[Mariner]

This is necessary, though small potatoes.

The institutional fraud is in the counting.

And in the mail.

[Tell It Right]

It's in the counting. And in the mail. And in the lawfare against good minding Republicans (to deter others from running). And in the redistricting. And in the brainwashing in "schools". And in the taxpayer funding to "NGO's" that are nothing but fronts to Dim campaigns.

The Dims are obsessed enough to win by any means necessary. Beating them will require us taking on that same attitude.

[drypowder]

Once the election is called in the Democrat’s favor, that’s it because of all of the planted Democrat Judges will refuse to hear any challenges. Kalifornia is sooooo f’d.

[spintreebob]

“The institutional fraud is in the counting. And in the mail.”

It is necessary to provider some detail.

Fraud in counting? The primary counting fraud I have seen is shifting most of the count of 3d party candidates to the preferred candidate. This was big in IL when I was there.
How is it done in the CA jungle primary? Proof, not allegations.

Fraud in the mail? What I have seen and proved is Vote Harvesters (In IL aka precinct workers) vote on behalf of the dead, minors age 16-17, non-citizens, movers, vacant houses, vacant lots. (Rare is it that I have seen an illegal vote.) How is it done in CA? Proof, not allegations.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Yeah too little too late, they already shredded the ballots for Hilton and Pratt..so whats the point of this its a total waste of time this should have been done BEFORE the counting began

[Sarah Barracuda]

Republicans always lead in this state til the Dems find out how many votes they “need” to make sure they win, works every single damn time

[avital2]

if Judicial Watch is right that there are 873000 inactives on voter rolls, that is a lot of names that can be used for mail-in ballots that are marked,harvested for candidates of choice. that is a good part of the game.