Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UK Passes A Lifetime Smoking Ban. Could America Be Next?
Forbes ^ | Apr 22, 2026 | Jessie Pines

Posted on 04/27/2026 6:42:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The U.K. Parliament Tuesday passed the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that will permanently ban the sale of tobacco products to anyone born on or after Jan. 1, 2009, ultimately phasing it out for the entire population. Health Secretary Wes Streeting called it a "historic moment for the nation’s health." The law takes effect Jan. 1, 2027.

For Americans watching from across the pond, the question isn’t just whether this policy will work in Britain. It's whether anything like it could ever take root here in the United States.

The short answer is no — not at the federal level. But the longer answer is maybe, and it's already unfolding in Massachusetts and other states.

How the U.K.'s Smoking Ban Works

The mechanics of the law are simple. The U.K.’s current legal smoking age is 18. Under the new law, it rises by one year annually. Those born after 2008 are permanently locked out of the legal tobacco market, regardless of their age at the time of purchase.

For example, a 25-year-old born in 2009 won't be able to buy cigarettes in 2034. Same goes for a 50-year-old in 2059.

The bill does not ban smoking itself, nor does it criminalize possession. Cigarettes won’t be confiscated from those who already smoke. The intervention is at the point of sale: retailers must verify birth dates. The bill also grants ministers new regulatory powers over vaping products including controls on flavors and packaging. These are popular among youth in both the U.K. and the U.S.

The policy traces its lineage to New Zealand, which passed a similar Smokefree Environments amendment in 2022. But New Zealand’s incoming government controversially repealed it in 2023 before it was implemented.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: nannystate

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2026 6:42:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Because health care in government run.


2 posted on 04/27/2026 6:45:30 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Will they edit all of the Sherlock Holmes movies to omit Holmes’s and Dr. Watson’s pipe smoking?


3 posted on 04/27/2026 6:49:05 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Not a very nice way to treat aboriginal Americans who gave us tobacco.


4 posted on 04/27/2026 6:50:24 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

No, Native Americans will still be able to sell tobacco. The U.S. can’t force them to stop.


5 posted on 04/27/2026 6:51:24 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can we make it pot?

That skunk smell ruins most days.


6 posted on 04/27/2026 6:53:05 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (RandFan: An Obvious Plant, though whether Leftist or Vegetal, I can’t be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Will the next step be to ban alcohol to appease Muslim sensibilities?


7 posted on 04/27/2026 6:53:18 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle1

Bacon is next.


8 posted on 04/27/2026 6:54:30 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Mexican cartels say Bring It.


9 posted on 04/27/2026 6:54:33 PM PDT by Romulus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
How much money will the smoking ban cost the NHS.

You may not have read, smokers cost healthcare less money than nonsmokers.

10 posted on 04/27/2026 6:55:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Probably not. The goverment wants people to smoke pot.


11 posted on 04/27/2026 6:57:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
#8: "Bacon is next."

Correction: "Pork is next."

12 posted on 04/27/2026 6:58:21 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If smokers cost healthcare less, overall, its because they die younger.


13 posted on 04/27/2026 6:59:59 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This legislation is a joke... Besides... The vast majority of Cigarettes aren’t sold legally anymore... Most smokers depend on the black market especially in Europe and Canada where cigarette taxes have made legal cigarettes unbuyable.

In Canada if you buy legally sold cigarettes they are typically $20+ per package... Illegal cigarettes are being sold for $15 to $20 per carton usually through indigenous sales... In Europe the illegal cigarettes are likely being sold by Roma / Travelers. Cigarettes in the UK sell for £17 a pack... That’s $22 American per pack.

What person in their right mind would buy ‘legal’ cigarettes?


14 posted on 04/27/2026 7:01:45 PM PDT by jerod (Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Yes, but shouldn’t the government encourage smoking, since it brings down costs?


15 posted on 04/27/2026 7:02:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Next they’ll ban dogs. They don’t want to offense their muslims.


16 posted on 04/27/2026 7:02:50 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No, it would be incredibly unconstitutional. Regardless of “good intentions.”


17 posted on 04/27/2026 7:03:55 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Not constitutional at the federal level (though that would not stop them).

Not possible to enforce. Didn't prohibition teach them anything? Or do the figure total surveillance of everybody will do the trick this time?

18 posted on 04/27/2026 7:09:03 PM PDT by Salman (The Democrats have seceded from the human race. It's time for Trump to go full Pinochet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Cut the rights and raise the taxes


19 posted on 04/27/2026 7:10:22 PM PDT by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Decades of anti-smoking propaganda and elimination of smoking areas in restaurants, bars, and other public places have lowered the rate among adult Americans to 9.9% in 2024. At its peak around 1960, 42% of adult Americans were smokers.


20 posted on 04/27/2026 7:10:23 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson