Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/18/2026 8:26:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
In a stunning performance that would have any stage magician green with envy, the amazing sudden wealth of Democrat Representative Ilhan Omar (MN-05) has evaporated, like dandelion fluff on a windy summer's day.
The Squad member claims that the $30 million in wealth supposedly in the hands of her and her husband was just a mistake in accounting records.
Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., said she is not a millionaire and blamed a major accounting error after a congressional financial disclosure listing her assets as high as $30 million drew scrutiny from Republicans and a congressional watchdog.
An amended filing reviewed by The Wall Street Journal shows Omar and her husband’s assets were between $18,004 and $95,000, a sharp drop from an earlier disclosure that estimated their holdings between $6 million and $30 million.
"The amended disclosure confirms what we’ve said all along: The congresswoman is not a millionaire," Omar spokesperson Jacklyn Rogers told the Journal, adding that the filing was corrected "as soon as the discrepancy was identified."
Uh huh.
Now, from (let's be fair) between $8 million and $30 million, to somewhere between $18,004 (seems oddly specific) and $95,000, that's quite a mistake. Any accountant making a mistake that grand should be discharged. Also, are we to believe that Ilhan Omar and her venture capitalist husband never saw the initial report, which was horrendously in error? Are we really supposed to believe that? Imagine your accountant coming to you with paperwork showing your net worth at $30 million - wouldn't you stop and say, "Hey, wait just a doggone minute here, I'm not that rich!"
Sorry, Ms. Omar, but my horse squeeze detector is off the scale right now.
Read More: Trump Slams Omar, Tlaib As 'Lunatics' Screaming at SOTU
Remember, her husband is still facing serious questions about his business and his business associates.
A longtime Democratic operative who worked for top party figures before jumping into private ventures with the now-husband of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Tim Mynett, is back in the spotlight as swindling allegations resurface and Congress investigates Omar's skyrocketing net worth via her husband's companies, according to her financial disclosures.
William Hailer and Mynett, who met working for now-Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison when he was in Congress, were both political operatives before they turned to venture capitalism and the wine industry. Hailer was a senior advisor to former Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez and also has an extensive history working for Ellison, who was the DNC co-chair. Between consulting fees and reimbursements, Hailer raked in over $250,000 advising the DNC and Ellison, according to FEC filings.
Here's the onion:
Through these business ventures, which include wine and cannabis, Hailer left a trail of fraud and swindling allegations tied to eSt Ventures, which was co-founded by Hailer and Mynett, and the subsequently formed Badlands Fund, which was created to control another investment fund that the pair also created called Badlands Ventures.
Uh huh.
Now, even a rabid leftie like Ilhan Omar is entitled to due process, which in her case would seem to be a Congressional investigation into her sudden wealth - and its even more sudden evaporation. Now, the world of venture capital and high finance isn't a world I've ever moved in, not when I have to take a look at our bank balances before dropping $200 worth of diesel fuel into my pickup. But this sure smells fishy to me. This whole thing, an "accounting error" that amounted to tens of millions, the fact that wasn't noticed by Rep. Omar and her husband, who had to know they weren't really that rich, and now the sudden resolution?
I'm not buying it.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
She’s a fraudulent crook, Jim.
Are Omar & Kamalaladingdong “Legs Up” related since they display the same traits, i.e., making campaign millions of taxpayer funds disappear?
Disappeared just like Saddam’s WMDs...
Another Scamalis
This could be a harbinger to the sudden poverty of quite a few Congress Critters.
Just imagine how rich she would be if she didn’t marry her brother.
That Lying Muzzie RAT needs to go. She is nothing but an evil, muzzie squaw.
Congressmen/women who file false financial disclosure forms face severe penalties, including potential prison time, substantial fines..........and the loss of their seats through expulsion.
Under the “Ethics in Government Act,” knowingly and willfully falsifying
or failing to file reports can lead to civil penalties.
Falsifying official financial reports can lead to charges of making
false statements, which can result in imprisonment for up to 5 years.
.
Expulsion/Resignation: High-profile cases, such as former Rep. George Santos, demonstrate that falsifying documents can lead to federal indictment, including charges of wire fraud, money laundering, and theft of public funds.
Tax-Related Penalties: If false filings are linked to taxes, members may face charges for aiding in the preparation of false tax returns, which carry prison sentences, such as the 3-year term faced by former Rep. Michael Grimm. FBI (.gov)
Cong George Santos: Charged with, among other things, providing materially false information on financial disclosure forms, which was central to a criminal case that led to his expulsion and a potential sentence of over seven years.
Cong Michael Grimm: Pleaded guilty to aiding and assisting the preparation of a false tax return, resulting in a prison sentence, and subsequently resigned.
FBI (.gov)
The Attorney General may pursue civil or criminal penalties based on referrals from the House Ethics Committee or other authorities. While some errors are corrected with amended reports, “knowing and willful” false reporting triggers the severe penalties described. (House.gov)
As of April 2026, Rep. Ilhan Omar has not been formally charged with violating the Ethics in Government Act by knowingly filing false financial disclosures. However, she is facing intense scrutiny and a House Oversight Committee investigation into a massive, heavily revised, and potentially erroneous 2024 filing that suggested her wealth jumped to $30 million.
The Filing Error: Rep. Omar amended a prior filing, reducing reported assets from a potential $30 million down to roughly $18,000–$95,000, attributing the initial high numbers to major accounting errors.
House Republicans are investigating this discrepancy, questioning the, according to Rep. Jeff Van Drew in this YouTube video, “unusual” fluctuation and potential violations of ethics rules.
Prior Investigations:
The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) previously investigated accusations regarding her book royalties and financial disclosures in 2022, ultimately recommending dismissal of those specific allegations.
State-Level Violations: In 2019, the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board found she violated state campaign finance rules, leading to fines and reimbursement of funds.
(Office of Congressional Conduct.gov)
Note: The investigations mentioned are in progress or based on 2026 reporting, and no formal legal finding of “willful” falsification has been made by federal authorities.
So if she got divorced today, her lawyer would only be looking for a few bucks in the division of assets?
Or maybe this is just Sharia Math.
As of April 2026, Rep. Ilhan Omar has not been formally charged with violating the Ethics in Government Act by knowingly filing false financial disclosures. However, she is facing intense scrutiny and a House Oversight Committee investigation into a massive, heavily revised, and potentially erroneous 2024 filing that suggested her wealth jumped to $30 million.
The Filing Error: Rep. Omar amended a prior filing, reducing reported assets from a potential $30 million down to roughly $18,000–$95,000, attributing the initial high numbers to major accounting errors.
House Republicans are investigating this discrepancy, questioning the, according to Rep. Jeff Van Drew in this YouTube video, “unusual” fluctuation and potential violations of ethics rules.
Prior Investigations:
The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) previously investigated accusations regarding her book royalties and financial disclosures in 2022, ultimately recommending dismissal of those specific allegations.
State-Level Violations: In 2019, the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board found she violated state campaign finance rules, leading to fines and reimbursement of funds.
(Office of Congressional Conduct.gov)
Note: The investigations mentioned are in progress or based on 2026 reporting, and no formal legal finding of “willful” falsification has been made by federal authorities.
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (EIGA) is a US federal law enacted post-Watergate to bolster public trust by curbing corruption and conflicts of interest. It requires mandatory financial disclosures for senior officials across all three government branches, created the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), and established provisions for special prosecutors. Campaign Legal Center
Key Components and Objectives
Mandatory Financial Disclosure: Requires high-level officials in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to file annual public reports detailing assets, income, liabilities, and transactions to prevent conflicts of interest.
Office of Government Ethics (OGE): Created the OGE, which oversees the executive branch ethics program, issues regulations, and provides training to prevent conflicts of interest.
Independent Counsel/Special Prosecutor: Initially established the special prosecutor (later independent counsel) role to investigate top executive officials, independent of the Attorney General.
Public Access: Reports are made public to allow scrutiny, although using them for commercial, solicitation, or unlawful purposes is prohibited.
Post-Employment Restrictions: Mandates limitations on lobbying activities for former government employees to prevent “revolving door” corruption.
The act aims to ensure that public service remains focused on the public interest rather than personal financial gain.
Congress.gov
At 40 Years Old, The Ethics in Government Act is in Need of a Tune-up
Oct 26, 2018 — The Ethics in Government Act (EIGA) is a law that was created after the Watergate scandal. The EIGA’s key reforms include: snip
Campaign Legal Center
35th Anniversary of the Ethics in Government Act - OGE.gov
Nov 8, 2013 — It is ensuring that employees who seek to leave government remain impartial in their government work as they look for new employment...snip
OGE.gov
What’s the surprise? Everyone knows they closed the Learing Centers in MN. Couple that with the shutdown of NGO’s and I’m surprised she has two pots to...urinate in.
The U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) is an independent executive branch agency established in 1978 to prevent conflicts of interest among federal employees. It sets ethical standards, provides education and guidance, and oversees the financial disclosure system for over 2.7 million employees in over 130 agencies. (Wiki)
Key Aspects and Usage Examples
Preventing Conflicts of Interest: OGE works to ensure government decisions are made free from personal financial bias.
Financial Disclosures: OGE oversees a system reviewing public and confidential financial reports for nearly 400,000 officials, including senior leaders and presidential appointees.
Setting Standards: OGE creates and updates the Standards of Conduct for Executive Branch Employees, which guides behavior across the government.
Education and Training: The agency provides training and counseling to over 4,500 agency ethics officials to ensure compliance with laws.
Presidential Transitions: OGE helps review the finances of nominees for Senate-confirmed positions to prevent conflicts before they take office.
Oversight: OGE reviews individual agency ethics programs every 4-5 years and publishes findings to ensure compliance.
Common OGE Resources for Public Transparency
Public Financial Disclosure Reports: Available on the OGE website.
Certificates of Divestiture: Documents for selling assets to avoid conflicts.
Ethics Pledge Waivers: Public records of official ethics waivers.
US citizens can take action when a member of Congress violates financial laws, though direct lawsuits are difficult due to legal immunities. Instead, legal action generally takes the form of filing complaints with ethics bodies, which can lead to investigations by the Department of Justice or congressional ethics committees. (House Committee on Ethics.gov)
1. File a Complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE)
The OCE is an independent, non-partisan entity that reviews allegations of misconduct against House members, officers, and staff. Members of the public can submit information regarding potential violations of law or House rules, such as insider trading or failure to disclose financial transactions, to the OCE. The OCE reviews the information and, if deemed credible, recommends further investigation to the House Ethics Committee.
2. File a Complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC)
For issues specifically related to campaign finance violations, citizens can file a complaint with the FEC. Complaints can be submitted through the FEC OIG Hotline Portal, by mail, or by phone. FEC.gov
3. STOCK Act Violations
The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act requires members to report financial transactions within 30-45 days to prevent insider trading.
While direct citizen lawsuits under the STOCK Act are rare, watchdog groups (like the Campaign Legal Center) use public disclosure data to file complaints against lawmakers for untimely disclosures or potential insider trading.
4. Direct Legal Action (Lawsuits)
Suing a member of Congress directly is rarely successful due to broad legal immunities, particularly regarding their official duties. However, a citizen may have a case if:
<><>The action was outside their official capacity.
<><>The citizen can prove they suffered specific, direct harm (standing).
Disclaimer: The information provided here is for general knowledge, not legal advice. The OCC has jurisdiction to investigate any alleged violation of a “law, rule, regulation, or other standard of conduct” committed...
Office of Congressional Conduct.gov
Enforcement of Congressional Rules of Conduct: ...
Aug 28, 2025 — Complaints alleging misconduct or House rules violations by House Members, officers, or staff can be filed with the Committee on Ethics...
Here’s one way they steal tax dollars.
Muslim Cong Ilhan Omar and husband, Tim Mynett, filed official govt documents attesting to assets valued between $6 million-$30 million – a 3,500% jump in net worth from 2023-2024.....inflated figures stemming from Mynett’s two businesses – a Santa Rosa, Ca-based winery and a venture capital firm headquartered in Washington, DC.
As Cletus D. Yokel brilliantly posted: “How many ‘Learing Centers’ did Mynett’s venture capital firms
pump start-up money to....... colluding w/ Omar that USAID tax dollars would pay him back.”
Somalis, like Ilhan Omar, prove that IQ has nothing to do with intelligence. They are like roaches. Smart enough to thrive by taking advantage of stupid human systems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.