Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A crisis emerges across the US as ‘forever chemicals’ quietly contaminate drinking water wells
AP News ^ | Updated 9:36 AM CST, February 2, 2026 | MICHAEL PHILLIS and HELEN WIEFFERING

Posted on 02/02/2026 11:33:09 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

STELLA, Wis. (AP) — Kristen Hanneman made a small decision in 2022 that would upend life for her entire town.

State scientists were checking private drinking water wells across Wisconsin for a widely used family of harmful chemicals called PFAS. They mailed an offer to test the well outside her tidy farmhouse surrounded by potato farms cut out of dense forest. Without much thought, she accepted.

Months later, Hanneman found herself on the phone with a state toxicologist who told her to stop drinking the water — now. The well her three kids grew up on had levels thousands of times higher than federal drinking water limits for what are commonly known as forever chemicals.

Hanneman’s well was hardly the only one with a problem. And the chemicals were everywhere. Pristine lakes and superb hunting made Stella a sportsman’s dream. Now officials say the fish and deer should be eaten sparingly or not at all.

Many residents here have known their neighbors for decades. If they want to move away from all this, it’s hard to sell their property – who, after all, would want to buy?

“Had I just thrown that survey in the garbage,” Hanneman said, “would any of this be where it is today?”

Stella is far from the only community near industrial sites and military bases nationwide where enormous amounts of PFAS have contaminated the landscape, posing a particular threat to nearby well owners.

Forever chemicals get their name because they resist breaking down, whether in well water or the environment. In the human body, they accumulate in the liver, kidneys and blood. Research has linked them to an increased risk of certain cancers and developmental delays in children.

Government estimates suggest as much as half of U.S. households have some level of PFAS in their water — whether it comes from...

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: fdaisallbutgone

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2026 11:33:09 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A good RO filter should remove almost all of it.


2 posted on 02/02/2026 11:35:01 AM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Now that little piece of info wouldn’t cause mass hysteria.


3 posted on 02/02/2026 11:39:19 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A good catalytic carbon filter brings the PFAS / PFOS numbers down, over 90%.


4 posted on 02/02/2026 11:41:29 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NO, filters cannot fix this problem. Only if everyone moves into the 10 minute cities, and is scanned and photos of every piece of our lives downloaded, will this be fixed.

My tongue is firmly planted in my cheek here...

Quit eating what we call food, but is actually poison. We can have a device that makes food like on Star Trek. Push a button, get faux bacon and eggs.

Tongue in cheek throughout.


5 posted on 02/02/2026 11:45:02 AM PST by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That’s why I only drink water out of plastic jugs. 🤣


6 posted on 02/02/2026 11:45:40 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Notice no real information is presented here. Just emotional manipulation....................


7 posted on 02/02/2026 11:47:26 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

You’re right, PFAS is an issue, especially on FUDS and former military installations.

Cleanup is expensive and long-term monitoring and land use controls are also used to help reduce exposure.


8 posted on 02/02/2026 11:47:29 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Our city forced us off of our well water, to sell us well water from THEIR source, which has more chemicals in it than our well had, PLUS fluoride. The difference in cost to consumer is...a little electricity vs 80 a month and dry lawns.


9 posted on 02/02/2026 11:47:38 AM PST by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fear Porn.

What is the differential in diseases in the area?

The article is very heavy on scare and very light on actual, proven dangers.


10 posted on 02/02/2026 11:51:16 AM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Exactly- and any sensible rural well water drinker would, or should no this. No problem whatsoever. Also, they need to understand what kind of ppms of what chemicals they say they can and have detected. This is deliberately left out the A@@ Press narrative.

What chemicals, and what parts per million. And finally if they are miles from the potential source of the ground water, then how deep is their well and what is the soil/ground gradient. All pertinent, and this article is otherwise propaganda and... bull road apples. E Coli is something else— and far more deadly.


11 posted on 02/02/2026 11:53:16 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So, Is this the replacement for microplastic hysteria?

I was just getting used to turning into Barbie.


12 posted on 02/02/2026 11:53:26 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Here is an example of the scare tactics:

“A grant did help Cindy Deere, who worries about how 25 years of drinking the water in Stella may affect her health. She replaced her well and a test confirmed the new one was PFAS-free. Still, she has a hard time trusting the water.”

If there was any substance to the scare, it would be states. But it isn’t stated, just vague reverences to “may” or “could be” associated with. Who decided? The EPA, as if they have any credibility left.


13 posted on 02/02/2026 11:54:30 AM PST by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I read that those wells are SATURATED with Hydrogen Di-oxide!


14 posted on 02/02/2026 11:57:47 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Some PFAS info for military installations and FUDS:

https://media.defense.gov/2020/Mar/17/2002265607/-1/-1/1/SPREADSHEET_OF_INSTALLATIONS_WHERE_DOD_PERFORMING_ASSESSMENT_OF_PFAS_USE_OR_POTENTIAL_RELEASE.PDF

https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/eer/ecc/pfas/docs/data/DoD-PFAS-Interim-Action-Locations-List-02FEB24.pdf

https://www.acq.osd.mil/eie/eer/ecc/pfas/docs/reports/PFAS-at-Base-Realignment-and-Closure-Locations.pdf

https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/docs/PFAS-EA-Final-Report-508.pdf


15 posted on 02/02/2026 11:58:44 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
Thank you for referencing that article E. Pluribus Unum.

A crisis emerges across the US as ‘forever chemicals’ quietly contaminate drinking water wells


Who's right and who's wrong?

Our bodies may not be riddled with microplastics after all — scientists say research is ‘not biologically plausible’ and ‘a joke’ (1.15.26)

I say consider filtering your water with a tested and approved filter design.

16 posted on 02/02/2026 12:00:10 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

https://www.lejeune.marines.mil/Offices-Staff/Environmental-Mgmt/PFAS/


17 posted on 02/02/2026 12:00:13 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It is highly disputed about the effects from PFAS. Not all scientists agree.

It was the environmental group owned President Auto-Pen who set the limit to ZERO


18 posted on 02/02/2026 12:03:57 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not all PFA’s are harmful to humans. I wish they would do some more testing and list what chemicals they find.


19 posted on 02/02/2026 12:05:10 PM PST by mfish13 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“ Forever chemicals get their name because they resist breaking down…”

These chemicals were developed because they don’t react with other chemicals. They pose little risk because they don’t react with anything in the body.

There is a subset of these chemicals that are somewhat similar in shape to the base pairs in DNA, and therefore might promote mutations, but the research on this isn’t conclusive, especially when compared to other similarly shaped molecules such as dioxin.


20 posted on 02/02/2026 12:09:02 PM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson