Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US judge blocks Trump administration from cutting Minnesota's food stamp funding
Reuters ^ | Jan.14, 2026 | Daniel Wiessner

Posted on 01/14/2026 7:40:21 PM PST by ViLaLuz

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from withholding $80 million to administer Minnesota's food stamp program while the state reviews the eligibility of 100,000 households amid claims ​of widespread fraud.

(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; arrestprovinzino; corruption; crime; enemieslist; enemyjudge; fjb; fraud; fuzztroll; interference; judgewatch; judicialtreason; lauraprovinzino; minnesota; rico; snap; subversion; welfare

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino, during a hearing in St. Paul, Minnesota federal court, said it was ‌likely illegal for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to give Minnesota only 30 days, until January 15, to complete the review of its food stamp program, ‌known as SNAP.

Minnesota sued after the USDA said it would stop covering half of the costs to administer the state's food stamp program if it failed to meet the deadline. The USDA cited a broader scandal around the theft of federal funds intended for social-welfare programs in Minnesota.

Provinzino on Wednesday said the USDA had not explained why the expedited review was necessary to root out fraud ⁠and that the agency had flouted a ‌federal law barring states from reviewing SNAP recipients' eligibility more than once a year.

“USDA is asking the state to violate federal law, regulations, and the state’s own operational plan," which had previously been ‍approved by the agency, said Provinzino, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden.

The judge blocked the USDA from withholding the funding from Minnesota pending the outcome of the lawsuit, including $20 million for the first quarter of the year that the agency had said earlier on Wednesday ​would not be disbursed. The case does not involve the funding for monthly food stamp benefits that go to recipients.

The ‌state has argued that the USDA's conduct was motivated by Trump's personal and political grievances with Minnesota and Democratic Governor Tim Walz, who has been a frequent target of the Republican president.

“This is part of an ongoing effort by the federal government to pummel our state,” Joseph Richie of the Minnesota Attorney General’s office said during the hearing.

Minnesota this week separately sued Trump's administration to block a surge of immigration enforcement officers into the state, following the fatal shooting of a woman by an ICE ⁠officer in Minneapolis.

Brian Mizoguchi of the U.S. Department of Justice said during ​Wednesday's hearing that Minnesota's shortcomings in administering other federally-funded programs justified the ​USDA's actions. He also said a preliminary ruling was unnecessary because the state could use its own funds to cover the loss of federal funding.

The SNAP program has been a focal point in Trump's battles ‍with Democratic lawmakers and state ⁠officials. During the 43-day government shutdown that ended in November, SNAP benefits lapsed for the first time and states were left to scramble to issue partial benefits with their own funds.

1 posted on 01/14/2026 7:40:21 PM PST by ViLaLuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

You keep shoveling out that money, understand?!


2 posted on 01/14/2026 7:41:55 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Was her appointment signed by the auto-pen?


3 posted on 01/14/2026 7:42:32 PM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

Yes.
“Provinzino, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden.”


4 posted on 01/14/2026 7:44:42 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz







5 posted on 01/14/2026 7:45:28 PM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

I think she is cute.


6 posted on 01/14/2026 7:48:15 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector


"I think she is cute."


🤪🤢
7 posted on 01/14/2026 8:01:29 PM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

If I forward you three dollars, can you apply that towards a vision screening? 8<)


8 posted on 01/14/2026 8:04:28 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert A Cook PE

The local Lions Club will usually do it for free.


9 posted on 01/14/2026 8:07:54 PM PST by Bernard ("Nothing is as expensive as that which the government provides for free." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

I’d like to know where this ho gets her authority. She’s just a stinkin’ Dipstick Court Judgette. Throw her butt in jail until she learns to stay inside the guard rails.


10 posted on 01/14/2026 8:13:13 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The DNC far-left turd worlders have "ICE Watch". What happened to "FBI Watch" and "CIA Watch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

Respectfully disagree.

If she can make a loud whistle for a cab through the space between her central incisors, that could be a talent.


11 posted on 01/14/2026 8:15:03 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

This makes the judge a co-conspirator in a massive fraud case.


12 posted on 01/14/2026 8:15:37 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Holy Crap. A dipstick court creep with breath that could knock a buzzard off a crap wagon.


13 posted on 01/14/2026 8:16:08 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The DNC far-left turd worlders have "ICE Watch". What happened to "FBI Watch" and "CIA Watch"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

She has the typical look of a protester.


14 posted on 01/14/2026 8:17:15 PM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I am no fan of Biden appointed judges but how else was she to rule when there is”a ‌federal law barring states from reviewing SNAP recipients’ eligibility more than once a year.” Even if such a law was not in effect 30 days would not be enough time to provide the required documentation.


15 posted on 01/14/2026 8:22:29 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

They say the SCOTUS will not be ready with the women’s sports ruling until “probably June.”

But everything Trump does is blocked and contested by a woke judge, which means the lazy Supreme Court justices have to get to work on them. They only work Tue-Thurs. on the weeks they are not on the many months of vacation (recess) anyway. That was in an article on how our Supreme Court works.


16 posted on 01/14/2026 8:24:10 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

She ruled based on current federal law. So on what grounds should she be jailed? And remember this is not the final outcome. It just means Trump will have to wait for the lawsuit to be decided before withholding that money should the lawsuit be decided in his favor.


17 posted on 01/14/2026 8:25:16 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

“I am no fan of Biden appointed judges but how else was she to rule when there is”a ‌federal law barring states from reviewing SNAP recipients’ eligibility more than once a year.” Even if such a law was not in effect 30 days would not be enough time to provide the required documentation.”
____________________________________________________________

Nice to have someone else recognize that the role of every judge is to uphold the law as it exists, not as we might want it.


18 posted on 01/14/2026 8:26:09 PM PST by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

As they say, “is it a man...?”


19 posted on 01/14/2026 8:26:36 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

“I think she is cute.”
___________________________________________________________

She’s a solid Minnesota 7


20 posted on 01/14/2026 8:27:17 PM PST by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson