Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

C. S. Lewis and Progressive Pathology
Law & Liberty ^ | 4/4/25 | Titus Techera

Posted on 12/11/2025 6:39:58 PM PST by EnderWiggin1970

"Milton! thou shouldst be living at this hour, / England hath need of thee, she is a fen / of stagnant waters” begins a famous sonnet by William Wordsworth about the spiritual troubles of two hundred years back. Of course, things seem just as catastrophic today as they did in 1802. After the English people voted for Brexit, the elites of England seem to have declared war on the country’s culture and liberties. They are swiftly bankrupting the country and breaking its party system; they make a mockery of the established Christian religion while the king celebrates Muslim holidays; they have invited into the country uncounted millions of strangers, many of whom have no idea what British civilization means, while arresting law-abiding citizens for wrong-think and releasing horrible criminals from jail.

The English people tell pollsters and anyone who will listen that this is miserable stuff, that they hate their elites, who among other things censor these complaints, and that their confidence is about to break. We commiserate with them, but from a certain distance. I’ve noticed that some of my English friends have moved from a moderate, cosmopolitan libertarianism to full-blown patriotism that we might recognize ourselves—“for England, Harry, and St. George.”

We can ask ourselves, how did the mother of Parliaments, the origin of modern liberty fall into despotism? We are used to thinking about Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four when we try to understand such horror. The disfiguring power of the modern state, with technology and ideology, war and poverty, aided by fanatical young radicals—that’s the minimum necessary to exercise tyranny, according to Orwell’s description. But what is tyranny like in its first moment, rather than its full expression? For that, like Orwell, we should turn to C. S. Lewis.

(Excerpt) Read more at lawliberty.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christianity; england; liberaltruth; orwell; totalitarian
It's worth pointing out that Orwell wrote 1984 after reading and reviewing Lewis' That Hideous Strength, the focus of this article.
1 posted on 12/11/2025 6:39:58 PM PST by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

I can see that influence. Arthur Koestler’s “Darkness at Noon” would seem to another obvious inspiration.


2 posted on 12/11/2025 6:47:43 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

everything we’re going through...the end of Britain as we knew it, and shortly thereafter, if all continues to proceed as it has, the end of America; Lewis has already seen and understood it.


3 posted on 12/11/2025 8:14:19 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

It’s worth quoting from the conclusion of Orwell’s review, because he hits on exactly what goes wrong with the ending of THAT HIDEOUS STRENGTH:

“One could recommend this book unreservedly if Mr. Lewis had succeeded in keeping it all on a single level. Unfortunately, the supernatural keeps breaking in, and it does so in rather confusing, undisciplined ways....

...Much is made of the fact that the scientists are actually in touch with evil spirits, although this fact is known only to the inmost circle. Mr. Lewis appears to believe in the existence of such spirits, and of benevolent ones as well. He is entitled to his beliefs, but they weaken his story, not only because they offend the average reader’s sense of probability but because in effect they decide the issue in advance. When one is told that God and the Devil are in conflict one always knows which side is going to win. The whole drama of the struggle against evil lies in the fact that one does not have supernatural aid.”

Tolkien apparently had the same reaction. The novel is about two-thirds of the way to being a masterpiece, and it’s still well worth reading for those two thirds, but it’s ultimately a failure artistically. Nevertheless, Lewis’ depiction of the NICE’s machinations is so prophetic of what’s going on in our world now that it still has great power and relevance.


4 posted on 12/11/2025 8:30:59 PM PST by Orosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

bkmk


5 posted on 12/11/2025 9:16:53 PM PST by lightman (Beat the Philly fraud machine the Amish did onest, ja? Nein, zweimal they did already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970
London

Powell! Alas, thou art six feet under now:

England hath need of thee; she totters, lumbered

With deficits, taxation, and unchecked migration

From lands that neither know nor care

For our cultural and moral store.

Oh, Enoch! Rise again, Romero zombie-like,

Staggering from the grave with holy groan,

And with one flick of thy enchanted wand —

Presto! manners, virtue, freedom, crumpets all restored.

Thou wert an upstanding bloke, after all:

There’s a good lad!

And yet, forget not the lowliest duty:

Disband the NHS as thou departest.

Regards,
6 posted on 12/12/2025 12:50:42 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

King Chulls is a nitwit of the First Order.


7 posted on 12/12/2025 4:11:38 AM PST by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Will read, thanks for posting.


8 posted on 12/12/2025 6:09:32 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orosius
What you call wrong (in agreement with Orwell) is exactly what so many of us call right about Lewis' work. What does Orwell give us as an alternative? Only a depressing ending because he failed to see the hope that we have is not unfounded. Nor do we need to take matters into our own hands in ungodly ways as we struggle against the hideous strength.

I don't believe in "supernature." That might surprise anyone familiar with my outspoken Christian, creationist, etc. beliefs. But consider how that word is defined by men like Orwell. They define "supernature" as a reality untouched by our reality, by definition one which is believed in only by faith and for which there is no evidence. And yet the 1000+ pages of the Bible speak of "supernature" breaking in and decidedly affecting the natural world innumerable times and with overwhelming force. It has and continues overwhelmingly to shape our world.

I've seen this firsthand in my work as a Bible smuggler, as odd, otherwise inexplicable things happen to allow Bibles to enter restricted nations. Whether it is customs agents shrugging and letting me brings scores of Bibles in simply because they were gift-wrapped, or security guards going home before a long-delayed flight arrived in the middle of the night, or another traveler misunderstanding agents instructions and climbing into the luggage Xray headfirst (creating pandemonium enough to allow an entire smuggling team to pass the security checkpoint unmolested), God does work in "confusing, undisciplined ways." Like the time my kids grabbed their bags off the Xray belt and ran off before the Xray technician (who had clearly seen the Bibles) could stop them, prompting the security guard at the human Xray checkpoint to grab our families' remaining luggage, thrust it to my wife's hands, and send her on her way to chase down the kids, as the Xray tech threw his hands up.

So there is no such thing as "supernature." But there are aspects to our reality that are denied by those who choose not to see it, and that blindness ultimately leads to despair as one can see all too readily the curse that is on this world. As Lewis himself said, "If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world."

9 posted on 12/12/2025 8:51:40 AM PST by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson