Posted on 11/04/2025 6:35:07 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
The coalition government of center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and center-left Social Democrats (SPD), which has been in office since May 2025, is aiming to significantly increase the number of people who have been ordered to leave the country in the campaign they are calling a "repatriation offensive." However, the political and media debate has tended to focus on a different word: deportations.
The dispute over deportations to Syria, a country devastated by a long civil war, shows just how difficult this undertaking is — and just how divergent opinions are, even among the two conservative Christian parties. Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU) recently visited the country and subsequently expressed caution: "Only possible to a very limited extent at this point in time," was his assessment of the possibility of forced deportations.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has spoken out, contradicting his foreign minister: "The civil war in Syria is over. There are now no longer any grounds for asylum in Germany, which means we can also begin repatriations," Merz said on Monday in a press conference. Adding "Those who then refuse to return to the country can, of course, be deported in the future."
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) has emphasized that he wants to push ahead with deportations as a matter of principle. Germany has not deported any individuals to Syria for 12 years, due to the civil war raging there.
(Excerpt) Read more at dw.com ...
Too late-you must be joking.
Yeah, good luck with that.
Of the 83 million in Germany about 4% are Muslims or 3.32 million.
Interesting. Thanks for posting. Save your civilization Germany.
Way too way too late
Well, if Germany does not have birthright citizenship nor ‘due process’ as we see it, what is there to keep the actual Germans from picking up anyone that cannot prove citizenship and ship them out to elsewhere?
That would certainly streamline the outflow and inspire many ‘newcomers’ to reconsider their German residency and maybe yearn for the ‘good ol’ days’ back in Krapistan.
It seems that the Elites will get their balkanized, internecine warfare, after all.
They would rather have nations fighting within themselves, than nations fighting other nations. Peace is the one thing they cannot stand.
“Well, if Germany does not have birthright citizenship nor ‘due process’ as we see it”
What? Where does it say that?
It's simple, deport anyone White, because they Did Nazi ... it coming!
Actually they're most pleased if they can have both at the same time.
Nothing is going to happen as long as the SPD is in the coalition. Merz will finally have to break the “firewall” shutting out the AfD to gain their support to change the law and re-do the judiciary which is thoroughly controlled by the left.
Have they stopped rapefugees from coming in.?
Seems like that should be the first step.
“the judiciary which is thoroughly controlled by the left”
What makes you think that? Do you have any examples in mind?
“ about 4% are Muslims or 3.32 million.”
They should start with Merkel and her supporters…
Worse than here, not as bad as the UK but the same contempt for citizens as shown by their vigorous prosecution and sentencing while "migrants" are treated with kid gloves.
You are probably correct. You can’t really utilize the MIC if you’re just trying to keep from getting killed by third-world invaders.
This invasion, however, is the subject of this thread and is really a glaring change in policy in countries like the US, UK and Germany. I am thinking that the Elites think that they can reserve atomic weapons for themselves while managing tribal warfare.
You need a country like Afghanistan to have non-atomic international warfare, and this has been done, I think.
'Follow Kirk to hell:' AfD lawmaker threatened after car burnt out
You may find our courts very lenient and compared with the often draconian sentences in the US they are, but this has nothing to do with judges being leftist.
The courts are bound by the laws and thus, if, for example, the law states that the maximum sentence for minors can’t exceed 10 years that’s it, no matter how gruesome the crime.
Likewise if the law does know no such thing as life without parole you can’t blame the judges if a murderer and rapist is released after, say, 20 years.
And i would be very careful when comparing outcomes of trials. Very often there are nuances that make a world of difference but are not reported properly because the reporters, not being trained in the law, don’t appreciate their importance.
It’s a lot. Sort of like sewage , just a tiny little bit is too much in your drinking water.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.