Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump says he'll go to the Supreme Court to watch tariff arguments
The Daily Mail ^ | 15 Oct 2025 | NIKKI SCHWAB

Posted on 10/15/2025 2:59:35 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

President Donald Trump said Wednesday he would likely make the highly unusual move and head to the Supreme Court to watch arguments on the cases related to his tariffs.

On November 5, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether the president has the authority to impose his tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Talking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump talked about how important the cases are to him.

'We have a big case coming up in the Supreme Court, and I will tell you, that’s one of the most important cases in the history of our country,' he said. 'That's why I think I'm going to the Supreme Court to watch it.'

'I've not done that. And I've had some pretty big cases,' he added.

Presidents generally only go to the Supreme Court for ceremonial events, as their attendance at the Court while a party to the case could raise constitutional questions related to the separation of powers.

But Trump continues to be a breaker of norms, floating that the justices should expect him.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commerce; hedoesnothaveit; illegaltariffs; maga; nodictator; noking; scotus; tariffs; trade; trumptariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2025 2:59:35 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Scare the crap out of them.


2 posted on 10/15/2025 3:03:15 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Wake up, smell the cat food in your bank account. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

If this case loses, there goes the primary pillar of Trumpnomics. So I hope the court considers what a bankrupt country we will be if they rule against it...


3 posted on 10/15/2025 3:10:05 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (You can vote totalitarians in but you can never vote them out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

He has a great stink-eye.


4 posted on 10/15/2025 3:19:11 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

I agree... Very well said.


5 posted on 10/15/2025 4:01:52 PM PDT by Pocketdoor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

That he does.


6 posted on 10/15/2025 4:09:12 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I’m no expert on such matters but it seems to me that that could backfire on him.


7 posted on 10/15/2025 4:11:07 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

So will judges be deciding/defining our entire tariff structure for every nation that we trade with? If the president can’t act to correct unfair tariffs then who can?

And so much for separation of powers.


8 posted on 10/15/2025 4:24:23 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

I think, that a tariff agreement, once maid, should be voted on by the House. Simple majority, and if passes, its law.


9 posted on 10/15/2025 4:28:51 PM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
So will judges be deciding/defining our entire tariff structure for every nation that we trade with? If the president can’t act to correct unfair tariffs then who can?

From what I understand, Congress had already decided to delegate their authority to the President.

So it's a simple fix. They can revoke the authority anytime they want as long as they are able to come up with the legislation for it.

10 posted on 10/15/2025 4:33:13 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Now judges are economic experts?

I think they are smart enough to know that they are not. Except for one or two far-left idiots.


11 posted on 10/15/2025 4:35:07 PM PDT by Veto! (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

The economic merits of tariffs are not what is being decided by the court.


12 posted on 10/15/2025 4:38:43 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
Trade Act of 1974
13 posted on 10/15/2025 4:44:10 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

> If the president can’t act to correct unfair tariffs then who can?<

The argument is Congress controls tariffs. Imagine how much corruption Schiff and Pocahontas could squeeze out of that.

EC


14 posted on 10/15/2025 4:49:15 PM PDT by Ex-Con777 (Leftists quote the Constitution like an atheist quotes the Bible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Chapter Four from Art of the Deal.

He will not show up because it would backfire. He’s just using his image and playing with the liberal media. Trump is too smart to try to pressure his own hand picked court.


15 posted on 10/15/2025 5:14:30 PM PDT by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The “art of the deal” continues...

Muhammad Ali would be impressed:
“Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”...


16 posted on 10/15/2025 5:25:34 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan

Anything that needs to go through a popularly voted Senate is useless


17 posted on 10/15/2025 5:34:51 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I hope he screams and wakes up the latinx and the mentally handicapped black woman, poor thing.


18 posted on 10/15/2025 9:33:30 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

I am not certain the senate should have to agree on appropriations and Tariffs, since the power was delegated to the executive. The House, who is essentially in charge of appropriations, should vote yea or nay to negotiated tariff deals.


19 posted on 10/16/2025 3:38:54 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Congress cannot even produce a budget so expecting them to negotiate complex tariffs on tens of thousands of products with every nation on earth is something that is never going to happen. On average, the House of Representatives is in session for about 147 days per year, a little under 5 month of actual legislative days. They don’t have the time, nor the competence to do it.


20 posted on 10/16/2025 7:42:57 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson