Posted on 10/14/2025 7:09:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Xi Jinping effectively vanished in July and the first half of August. Some China watchers speculated that his unexplained absence was a sign he was losing his grip on power. But he has since reappeared and been very visible again.
At the end of the month, he visited Tibet, then indulged in a high-profile, backslapping meeting with Vladimir Putin and the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Tianjin. He capped off his busy two weeks with the September 3 military parade in Beijing and a second meeting with his star guest Putin, this time accompanied by Kim Jong-un.
So, a great triumph for the neo-Maoist leader and the new Axis of Evil? Not so fast. The lessons to draw from these three events are a sight more nuanced. Here are five take-aways from Xi’s last few weeks.
First, Xi’s visit to Tibet was peculiar. It lasted just 24 hours. He inspected People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops in Lhasa on August 21, the 60th anniversary of Tibet’s founding as an autonomous state. He went home the next day. On his last visit in 2021 he stayed for four days. Even more curious was his absence from a visit to the biggest infrastructure project of his regime: the $165 billion Yarlung Tsangpo dam, now under construction, which will be the largest dam in the world. These kinds of projects are not only economically significant but provide plenty of opportunity for Xi’s political and military supporters to sing his praises.
Normally a visit to a project of this importance would be a must for a general secretary. Instead, the visit was made by Xi’s greatest political enemy, Hu Chunhua. Hu is the deposed reformist “crown prince” who was once seen as a potential next general secretary of the Chinese Communist party, until he was thrown off the politburo’s standing committee by Xi in 2022.
Yet three years after his humiliating demotion, Hu has made a surprise reappearance at the front line of Chinese politics. The PLA Daily even led with his name on its front page. After his time in the wilderness, is Hu back on the “crown prince” track? Maybe.
Second, the Shanghai meeting between Xi, Putin and Modi was not all it was cracked up to be. Western media seemed taken with the idea that India is now in alliance with China and Russia. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Modi is an alpha-male ultranationalist (not unlike Donald Trump) and he is fixed on the idea that India is the emerging dominant world power. He could well be correct. Based on current projections, India, which will have double China’s population by the end of the century, will become a bigger economy than either China or the US.
For Modi, the meeting could be seen as a middle finger to Trump’s tariff threat if India does not stop buying oil from Russia. But it does not mean India is rolling over to China. As I wrote in The Spectator last year, whereas Russia needs “a big-brother China relationship, India sees itself as the equal of China. A subservient role would not work.”
When asked whether India sided with the West or with Russia, the external affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has said: “I think we should choose a side, and that’s our side.”
Noticeably, Modi did not hang around for Xi’s military parade early this month. Instead, he flew to Japan, a country with which India conducts joint naval exercises aimed at the naval containment of China. In Tokyo, he signed a deal to use Japanese, not Chinese, high-speed trains.
Third, there was a long delay in announcing who was going to be the parade marshal on September 3. Usually, it is a job done by a full general and head of the Central Theater Command, whose job it is to defend (or control) Beijing. This time the role was given to a junior lieutenant general. The rumor is that Zhang Youxia, vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) and the general who is supposedly leading the move against Xi behind the scenes, has taken personal control of the Central Theater Command. In a demonstration of strength, Zhang moved the 82nd Group Army – the main PLA unit that put down the Tiananmen Square uprising in 1989 – into central Beijing before the parade.
Placements at the parade also seemed to hint at shifts in power. General Zhang was on the front row with the politburo standing committee members. Even more intriguingly, state television gave a long camera pan on the arrival of Wang Yang, a former standing committee member once discarded by Xi, who is now tipped as a possible next CCP general secretary or premier. Chinese TV is always up to date on who politically is in or out.
Fourth, although Chinese and western media bigged up the number of foreign dignitaries (26) who attended the military parade, the numbers were down from the 44 who attended in 2015.
Ten years ago, attendees included Tony Blair and the former German chancellor Gerhard Schröder. No such grandees this time. Far from China being stronger, as many in the West have concluded, it is more convincingly arguable that China is more isolated now than at any time since the 1980s.
Fifth, the September 3 celebrations also renewed speculation about Xi’s health. In Tibet he looked ponderous and unsteady on his feet. Likewise at the parade. In addition, comments were made about his puffy and reddish complexion. Some have speculated that this is characteristic of liver disease. It is a diagnosis compatible with his reputation as a heavy drinker.
But the most revealing takeaway of all from the last month comes from America, not China. According to reports, Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of Defense, has in recent weeks been trying to set up a telephone call with General Zhang. Why would Hegseth call for a meeting with the vice chairman of the CMC rather than with his political counterpart, the defense minister Dong Jun? Perhaps US intelligence has an idea about who is increasingly the real power behind the throne in Beijing.
I don’t know.
Third Base!
Dems brought up BS that Trump was dead and Tim Walz smiled and said he hoped so but don’t give up, he’ll be dead someday on some happy day (cheers from crowd).
FR has had perhaps a half dozen “Putin secret serious illness said to make his death weeks away. What will that mean for the Kremlin power shakeup?” 2022 or so to now.
Now, Xi probably getting a full blood transfer from a young dissident like rich people get (rumor of Keith Richards) and has only been out of the news since September 3rd.
The answer is contained within the question.
Bkmk
Didn’t the President say he talked directly with Xi over the weekend trying to plunge protect the market, which is not yet totally focused on what matters.
It’s not tariffs.
It’s neodymium magnets and how they define society.
There is a huge tendency in Wall Street to desperately flee from the idea that something other than money might define situations. You can tariff all you want, but if you don’t have neodymium magnets you will lose air conditioning and refrigeration over the next 18 months — about 8 yrs before you can refine your own. Regardless of the price of printed QE pieces of paper you offer for them.
Sounds like Xi is on a short leash. Perhaps he’ll soon retire to “spend more time with his family”.
CC
“Who’s running China?”
Auto pen?
But seriously, if Xi will be stripped of more power, it would likely be at the upcoming 4th Plenum, starting October 20th.
It’s been quite awhile since this kind of blind speculation, based on analyses of TV broadcasts, travel times, and newspaper photos, about a communist ruler’s future has been bandied about.
I really enjoyed the Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko, Gorbachev, Yeltsin merry-go-round. I like the speculation about the Kim family, too. In the PRC, the leaders since Mao have lasted about a dozen years, so Xi has reached his “best by” date, but the Chinese are a little more tight-lipped about these things.
Q) Is there social unrest in china now?
A) As of late 2025, social unrest in China is ongoing and appears to be increasing, driven by economic stagnation and frustration with government policies. While large-scale coordinated protests are rare due to strict government suppression, smaller, localized acts of dissent are frequent and widespread.
Answer:
And the defeatist pro China troll makes a grand pronouncement of doomage again!
Agreed, live by the sword, die by the sword. That is the end to most dictators.
Cesar found out, they tried with hitler, Mussolini got it, gaddafi, sadam didn’t end well, putin is finding out.
Lots of talk about body doubles and “health concerns” for both putin and xi.
One thing about people who rule by power and fear, there are always others who want that.
The animal kingdom is full of examples of when the alpha shows weakness another challenges and takes their place
Circle of life😂
The new China - Grandpa and grandma Han in wheelchairs crying as millions of strapping, young Indians from India overrun China’s failed abortion positions.
Abortion is not only the murder of babies, it’s the murder of civilizations.
At 1.2 billion population you are being a bit hyperbolic.
By 2100, China’s population will more than halve to 633 million, according to U.N. projections.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/china-population-decline-worker-crisis/
https://bsky.app/profile/thereccelizard.bsky.social/post/3m3ckeivow22c
On 15 Oct there is more Wing Loong (YILO4200) spoofing out of Qionghai Bo’ao airport Hainan CHN again with the drone pretending to be Rada Airlines Il-62MGr CLASSIC EW-450TR. It is again good enough that FR24 is believing it!
https://bsky.app/profile/thereccelizard.bsky.social/post/3m3afc5ffic2j
So China will have the population it had in the 1950s. Still don’t see the problem.
PS: There is nothing better than a WORKER CRISES than being a worker. A seller’s market for labor HOW NICE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
