Posted on 10/14/2025 5:11:57 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito had some choice words for some lower courts on Tuesday over their apparent eagerness to “avoid” ruling on cases involving schools “transing” children without their parents’ knowledge or consent.
The comments came in an order released by the high court on Tuesday that listed which pending lower court cases it will and will not be taking up in its 2025-2026 term. Among the cases rejected by the justices was Lee v. Poudre School District R-1, which centers around a lawsuit brought by two sets of parents against the Colorado-based Poudre School District R-1.
According to CBS News, “The families challenged policies implemented by the [school district] which they say urge district employees not to disclose information about a students’ [so-called] gender identity, including to parents.”
“In one instance,” the outlet reported, “the [Lee family’s] daughter … was urged to attend a meeting of the Gender and Sexualities Alliance at her middle school,” during which “a substitute teacher in the school district spoke about gender identity and sexual orientation, and warned students that it may not be safe to tell their parents about the discussion, according to court papers.”
A second student reportedly “had a similar experience at after-school GSA meetings.” This student also “told her parents she felt unsafe about being in the same building as a teacher who encouraged her to attend the GSA meetings, according to court filings.”
Both sets of parents filed a lawsuit against the school district, alleging that officials unlawfully interfered with their decision-making role as parents and therefore violated their 14th Amendment rights. The legal challenge was dismissed by the district court, a decision that was later upheld by the 10th Circuit...
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
So hard to believe where this country is now. We’re beyond reasoning.
Weak and pathetic males, not men because it takes balls to be a man; and manly “strong” women have led us to this point.
You watch. The next boundaries crusher will be not only more men in girls sports but men in their 20s and 30s competing in high school sports.
The libs will be tied in knots trying to explain how THAT is wrong but letting men compete against women is not wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.