Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/07/2025 7:11:29 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Communities with high rates of cousin marriages are significantly more likely to claim disability benefits, according to new data seen by The Mail on Sunday.
Analysis shows a rise of a quarter in the handouts in areas where the practice is more common.
In Bradford, where one in six children is born to parents who are cousins, disability benefits are 23 per cent higher than average, costing the taxpayer millions of pounds more every week.
Experts say that the increase is down to the higher risk of birth defects and deformities – which include blindness, hearing loss and schizophrenia – when a child’s parents are so closely related.
The news comes after the MoS revealed last week that the NHS has been accused of ‘taking the knee’ to political correctness after it published guidance advocating cousin marriage, saying it offered benefits such as ‘stronger extended family support systems’.
Cousin marriage is most common in British-Pakistani communities, which account for around
Four per cent of all births nationwide but about 30 per cent of recessive gene disorders.
Experts believe that the resulting birth defects have caused 20 per cent of infant deaths in Birmingham, 20 per cent in Redbridge in East London, and 53 per cent of all South Asian infant deaths in Bradford.
Dr Patrick Nash, director of the Pharos Foundation social science research group in Oxford, said: ‘These chronically inbred populations are at much higher risk of death, serious disability, non-fatal development issues and lifelong ill-health.
‘Rogue statistics and terrible public health advice are serving to minimise the dangers of cousin marriage and disguise the true scale of the problem.’
Richard Holden, the Tory MP who is campaigning to ban the practice, said: ‘First cousin marriage undermines everything modern Britain stands for in terms of personal freedom and integration.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Those who live in the District of Corruption more than likely claim the most of all locations in the U.S.
I thought it was “friends with benefits”
Nothing says lovin’ like doing your cousin’.
I bet a study on cousin marriage in Minnisomalia would be revealing.
Uh, only if the cousin is truly doable.
I thought this was going to be an article about West Virginia
Strange but True: West Virginia and Kentucky are among the strictest states concerning first-cousin marriages (you can’t even marry your first cousin in KY if one or both of you is adopted).
Is this because the kids are malformed, or is it simply because a population too lazy to look beyond their immediate family is too lazy to work?
The Whittaker’s. If you haven’t watched those video from The Soft Underbelly you need to see at least as much as you can take. It’s sad, sick, and educational. I feel so bad for those folks.
The word of the day: Consanguinity.
It s very prevalent in the Middle East
Consanguinity is the state of being descended from a common ancestor, often referring to marriage or sexual relations between closely related blood relatives, such as first cousins.
I’ve always wondered if all those ‘gods’ in India depicted in their art and statues back in antiquity were derived from a superstitious explaination for all the defects and deformities born from children whose parents were closely related.
It is actually West Virginia that has the highest number of disability claims as a percentage of population. Followed by Arkansas, Mississippi and Kentucky. The District of Columbia is fairly low in disability claims.
Cousins with benefits?
And, that’s what they want. If they can control if you eat or not, they can control you. I assume this is the tactic that they plan to try to use to control the mooslims once they get to a certain concentration of the population.
It’ll likely end badly for them, but that’s what they get.
Ummm...
The royal family? And royal families in general? We gonna talk about them?
The historic reasons for it are the same whether you had a lot to protect or somewhat less to protect. To keep the accumulated wealth and property within the family.
Only attractive cousins.
I've got some attractive cousins -- we're pretty bunch -- but no thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.